Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery - A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery - A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage. / Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov; Hansen, Peter Møller; Ewertsen, Caroline; Lönn, Lars; Jensen, Jørgen Arendt; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann.

In: Ultrasound International Open, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2019, p. E53-E59.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hansen, KL, Hansen, PM, Ewertsen, C, Lönn, L, Jensen, JA & Nielsen, MB 2019, 'Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery - A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage', Ultrasound International Open, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. E53-E59. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0853-2002

APA

Hansen, K. L., Hansen, P. M., Ewertsen, C., Lönn, L., Jensen, J. A., & Nielsen, M. B. (2019). Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery - A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage. Ultrasound International Open, 5(2), E53-E59. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0853-2002

Vancouver

Hansen KL, Hansen PM, Ewertsen C, Lönn L, Jensen JA, Nielsen MB. Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery - A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage. Ultrasound International Open. 2019;5(2):E53-E59. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0853-2002

Author

Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov ; Hansen, Peter Møller ; Ewertsen, Caroline ; Lönn, Lars ; Jensen, Jørgen Arendt ; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann. / Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery - A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage. In: Ultrasound International Open. 2019 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. E53-E59.

Bibtex

@article{3fea0043eb454b98ab50c9d952bf120c,
title = "Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery - A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage",
abstract = "Purpose: Stenosis of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) induces complex blood flow with increased velocities. Disease assessment is performed with Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), but Doppler ultrasound is limited by angle dependency and DSA by ionizing radiation. An alternative is the vector flow imaging method based on transverse oscillation (TO), an angle-independent vector velocity technique using ultrasound. In this study, flow complexity and velocity measured with TO were compared with DSA for the assessment of stenosis in the SFA.Materials and Methods: The vector concentration, a measure of flow complexity, and the velocity ratio obtained from the stenosis and a disease-free adjacent vessel segment, were estimated with TO in 11 patients with a total of 16 stenoses of the SFA. TO data were compared with the corresponding stenosis degree percentage obtained with DSA.Results: The correlation between the vector concentration and DSA was very strong (R=0.93; p<0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-0.98), while only moderate for velocity ratio and DSA (R=0.50; p<0.07; 95% CI: 0.00-0.80). The correlation coefficients that were found were significantly different (p<0.005) without overlapping CI.Conclusion: The study indicated that flow changes in the SFA induced by stenosis can be quantified with TO, and that stenosis grading may be improved by estimation of flow complexity instead of velocity ratio. TO is a potential diagnostic tool for the assessment of atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease.",
author = "Hansen, {Kristoffer Lindskov} and Hansen, {Peter M{\o}ller} and Caroline Ewertsen and Lars L{\"o}nn and Jensen, {J{\o}rgen Arendt} and Nielsen, {Michael Bachmann}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1055/a-0853-2002",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "E53--E59",
journal = "Ultrasound International Open",
issn = "2199-7152",
publisher = "GeorgThieme Verlag",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery - A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage

AU - Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov

AU - Hansen, Peter Møller

AU - Ewertsen, Caroline

AU - Lönn, Lars

AU - Jensen, Jørgen Arendt

AU - Nielsen, Michael Bachmann

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Purpose: Stenosis of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) induces complex blood flow with increased velocities. Disease assessment is performed with Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), but Doppler ultrasound is limited by angle dependency and DSA by ionizing radiation. An alternative is the vector flow imaging method based on transverse oscillation (TO), an angle-independent vector velocity technique using ultrasound. In this study, flow complexity and velocity measured with TO were compared with DSA for the assessment of stenosis in the SFA.Materials and Methods: The vector concentration, a measure of flow complexity, and the velocity ratio obtained from the stenosis and a disease-free adjacent vessel segment, were estimated with TO in 11 patients with a total of 16 stenoses of the SFA. TO data were compared with the corresponding stenosis degree percentage obtained with DSA.Results: The correlation between the vector concentration and DSA was very strong (R=0.93; p<0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-0.98), while only moderate for velocity ratio and DSA (R=0.50; p<0.07; 95% CI: 0.00-0.80). The correlation coefficients that were found were significantly different (p<0.005) without overlapping CI.Conclusion: The study indicated that flow changes in the SFA induced by stenosis can be quantified with TO, and that stenosis grading may be improved by estimation of flow complexity instead of velocity ratio. TO is a potential diagnostic tool for the assessment of atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease.

AB - Purpose: Stenosis of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) induces complex blood flow with increased velocities. Disease assessment is performed with Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), but Doppler ultrasound is limited by angle dependency and DSA by ionizing radiation. An alternative is the vector flow imaging method based on transverse oscillation (TO), an angle-independent vector velocity technique using ultrasound. In this study, flow complexity and velocity measured with TO were compared with DSA for the assessment of stenosis in the SFA.Materials and Methods: The vector concentration, a measure of flow complexity, and the velocity ratio obtained from the stenosis and a disease-free adjacent vessel segment, were estimated with TO in 11 patients with a total of 16 stenoses of the SFA. TO data were compared with the corresponding stenosis degree percentage obtained with DSA.Results: The correlation between the vector concentration and DSA was very strong (R=0.93; p<0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-0.98), while only moderate for velocity ratio and DSA (R=0.50; p<0.07; 95% CI: 0.00-0.80). The correlation coefficients that were found were significantly different (p<0.005) without overlapping CI.Conclusion: The study indicated that flow changes in the SFA induced by stenosis can be quantified with TO, and that stenosis grading may be improved by estimation of flow complexity instead of velocity ratio. TO is a potential diagnostic tool for the assessment of atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease.

U2 - 10.1055/a-0853-2002

DO - 10.1055/a-0853-2002

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30886943

VL - 5

SP - E53-E59

JO - Ultrasound International Open

JF - Ultrasound International Open

SN - 2199-7152

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 232975056