Can magnetic resonance imaging enhance the assessment of potential new treatments for cognitive impairment in mood disorders? A systematic review and position paper by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 903 KB, PDF document

  • Nefize Yalin
  • Ida Seeberg
  • Katherine E. Burdick
  • Vicent Balanzá‐martínez
  • Caterina Del Mar Bonnin
  • Christopher R. Bowie
  • Andre F. Carvalho
  • Annemieke Dols
  • Katie Douglas
  • Peter Gallagher
  • Gregor Hasler
  • Beny Lafer
  • Kathryn E. Lewandowski
  • Carlos López‐jaramillo
  • Anabel Martinez‐aran
  • Roger S. Mcintyre
  • Richard J. Porter
  • Scot E. Purdon
  • Ayal Schaffer
  • Tomiki Sumiyoshi
  • Ivan J. Torres
  • Tamsyn E. Van Rheenen
  • Lakshmi N. Yatham
  • Allan H. Young
  • Eduard Vieta
  • Paul R. A. Stokes
Background
Developing treatments for cognitive impairment is key to improving the functioning of people with mood disorders. Neuroimaging may assist in identifying brain-based efficacy markers. This systematic review and position paper by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force examines the evidence from neuroimaging studies of pro-cognitive interventions.

Methods
We included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of candidate interventions in people with mood disorders or healthy individuals, following the procedures of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 statement. Searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to 30th April 2021. Two independent authors reviewed the studies using the National Heart, Lung, Blood Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Controlled Intervention Studies and the quality of neuroimaging methodology assessment checklist.

Results
We identified 26 studies (N = 702). Six investigated cognitive remediation or pharmacological treatments in mood disorders (N = 190). In healthy individuals, 14 studies investigated pharmacological interventions (N = 319), 2 cognitive training (N = 73) and 4 neuromodulatory treatments (N = 120). Methodologies were mostly rated as ‘fair’. 77% of studies investigated effects with task-based fMRI. Findings varied but most consistently involved treatment-associated cognitive control network (CCN) activity increases with cognitive improvements, or CCN activity decreases with no cognitive change, and increased functional connectivity. In mood disorders, treatment-related default mode network suppression occurred.

Conclusions
Modulation of CCN and DMN activity is a putative efficacy biomarker. Methodological recommendations are to pre-declare intended analyses and use task-based fMRI, paradigms probing the CCN, longitudinal assessments, mock scanning, and out-of-scanner tests.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBipolar Disorders
Volume24
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)615-636
ISSN1399-5618
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

ID: 319603174