Which Freedom of the Press? The Press Conceived as an 'Open Forum' or a 'Privileged Watchdog'
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
The article surveys the historical and current meaning of "Freedom of the Press" in constitutional and human rights law. Two different conceptions exist, the narrow one defining freedom of the press as the freedom of every one to publish without prior restraint, the broader one defining it as a privileged freedom of the organised press to gather and report on information of public interest. These two conceptions have very different answers to the question of whether the press should enjoy some privilege to be exempt from ordinary legislation when such legislation restricts the access of the press to inform the public on matters of public interest.
|Translated title of the contribution||Hvilken pressefrihed?: Pressen forstået om et 'åbent forum' eller en 'privilegeret vagthund'|
|Book series||Scandinavian Studies in Law|
|Number of pages||29|
|Publication status||Published - 2010|