What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review. / Frederiksen, Maria Eiholm; Lynge, E; Rebolj, M.

In: BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, Vol. 119, No. 1, 01.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Frederiksen, ME, Lynge, E & Rebolj, M 2012, 'What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review', BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, vol. 119, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03130.x

APA

Frederiksen, M. E., Lynge, E., & Rebolj, M. (2012). What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 119(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03130.x

Vancouver

Frederiksen ME, Lynge E, Rebolj M. What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2012 Jan;119(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03130.x

Author

Frederiksen, Maria Eiholm ; Lynge, E ; Rebolj, M. / What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review. In: BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2012 ; Vol. 119, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{fd2c0728463c4419844806b121706cac,
title = "What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review",
abstract = "Please cite this paper as: Frederiksen M, Lynge E, Rebolj M. What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review. BJOG 2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03130.x. Background If human papillomavirus (HPV) testing will replace cytology in primary cervical screening, the frequency of low-grade abnormal screening tests will double. Several available alternatives for the follow-up of low-grade abnormal screening tests have similar outcomes. In this situation, women's preferences have been proposed as a guide for management decisions. Objectives To determine women's preferences for the follow-up of low-grade cervical screening abnormalities. Search strategy Using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, PubMed was searched for articles published up to December 2010. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were consulted. Selection criteria Studies asking women to state a preference between active follow-up and observation for the management of low-grade abnormalities on screening cytology or HPV tests. Data collection and analysis Information on study design, participants and outcomes was retrieved using a prespecified form. Studies were sorted by design. Main results Thirteen studies were included in the review. In all five studies that surveyed women with abnormal tests before any management had started, two-thirds preferred active follow-up, predominantly as immediate colposcopy, to observation, predominantly as repeated Pap smears. In all but two studies testing other situations, women more often expressed a preference for active follow-up than for observation; however, women appeared to be somewhat more willing to accept observation if reassured of the low risk of cervical cancer. Conclusions Even for low-grade abnormal cervical tests, women tend to prefer active management strategies. It may be a challenge to meet their expectations of optimal follow-up when HPV testing is used in primary screening.",
author = "Frederiksen, {Maria Eiholm} and E Lynge and M Rebolj",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2011 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology {\textcopyright} 2011 RCOG.",
year = "2012",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03130.x",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
journal = "British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Supplement",
issn = "0140-7686",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review

AU - Frederiksen, Maria Eiholm

AU - Lynge, E

AU - Rebolj, M

N1 - © 2011 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 RCOG.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Please cite this paper as: Frederiksen M, Lynge E, Rebolj M. What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review. BJOG 2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03130.x. Background If human papillomavirus (HPV) testing will replace cytology in primary cervical screening, the frequency of low-grade abnormal screening tests will double. Several available alternatives for the follow-up of low-grade abnormal screening tests have similar outcomes. In this situation, women's preferences have been proposed as a guide for management decisions. Objectives To determine women's preferences for the follow-up of low-grade cervical screening abnormalities. Search strategy Using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, PubMed was searched for articles published up to December 2010. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were consulted. Selection criteria Studies asking women to state a preference between active follow-up and observation for the management of low-grade abnormalities on screening cytology or HPV tests. Data collection and analysis Information on study design, participants and outcomes was retrieved using a prespecified form. Studies were sorted by design. Main results Thirteen studies were included in the review. In all five studies that surveyed women with abnormal tests before any management had started, two-thirds preferred active follow-up, predominantly as immediate colposcopy, to observation, predominantly as repeated Pap smears. In all but two studies testing other situations, women more often expressed a preference for active follow-up than for observation; however, women appeared to be somewhat more willing to accept observation if reassured of the low risk of cervical cancer. Conclusions Even for low-grade abnormal cervical tests, women tend to prefer active management strategies. It may be a challenge to meet their expectations of optimal follow-up when HPV testing is used in primary screening.

AB - Please cite this paper as: Frederiksen M, Lynge E, Rebolj M. What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review. BJOG 2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03130.x. Background If human papillomavirus (HPV) testing will replace cytology in primary cervical screening, the frequency of low-grade abnormal screening tests will double. Several available alternatives for the follow-up of low-grade abnormal screening tests have similar outcomes. In this situation, women's preferences have been proposed as a guide for management decisions. Objectives To determine women's preferences for the follow-up of low-grade cervical screening abnormalities. Search strategy Using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, PubMed was searched for articles published up to December 2010. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were consulted. Selection criteria Studies asking women to state a preference between active follow-up and observation for the management of low-grade abnormalities on screening cytology or HPV tests. Data collection and analysis Information on study design, participants and outcomes was retrieved using a prespecified form. Studies were sorted by design. Main results Thirteen studies were included in the review. In all five studies that surveyed women with abnormal tests before any management had started, two-thirds preferred active follow-up, predominantly as immediate colposcopy, to observation, predominantly as repeated Pap smears. In all but two studies testing other situations, women more often expressed a preference for active follow-up than for observation; however, women appeared to be somewhat more willing to accept observation if reassured of the low risk of cervical cancer. Conclusions Even for low-grade abnormal cervical tests, women tend to prefer active management strategies. It may be a challenge to meet their expectations of optimal follow-up when HPV testing is used in primary screening.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03130.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03130.x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21895959

VL - 119

JO - British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Supplement

JF - British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Supplement

SN - 0140-7686

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 35353555