Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. / Olsen, Rikke Groth; Bjerrum, Flemming; Konge, Lars; Jepsen, Jan Viberg; Azawi, Nessn H.; Bube, Sarah Hjartbro.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 35, No. 8, 01.08.2021, p. 1265-1272.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Olsen, RG, Bjerrum, F, Konge, L, Jepsen, JV, Azawi, NH & Bube, SH 2021, 'Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy', Journal of Endourology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1265-1272. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0986

APA

Olsen, R. G., Bjerrum, F., Konge, L., Jepsen, J. V., Azawi, N. H., & Bube, S. H. (2021). Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of Endourology, 35(8), 1265-1272. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0986

Vancouver

Olsen RG, Bjerrum F, Konge L, Jepsen JV, Azawi NH, Bube SH. Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of Endourology. 2021 Aug 1;35(8):1265-1272. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0986

Author

Olsen, Rikke Groth ; Bjerrum, Flemming ; Konge, Lars ; Jepsen, Jan Viberg ; Azawi, Nessn H. ; Bube, Sarah Hjartbro. / Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. In: Journal of Endourology. 2021 ; Vol. 35, No. 8. pp. 1265-1272.

Bibtex

@article{e883df55fb5f4c969affc9e92796117b,
title = "Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate validity evidence for a simulator-based test in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Materials and Methods: The test consisted of three modules on the RobotiX Mentor VR-simulator: Bladder Neck Dissection, Neurovascular Bundle Dissection, and Ureterovesical Anastomosis. Validity evidence was investigated by using Messick's framework by including doctors with different RARP experience: novices (who had assisted for RARP), intermediates (robotic surgeons, but not RARP surgeons), or experienced (RARP surgeons). The simulator metrics were analyzed, and Cronbach's alpha and generalizability theory were used to explore reliability. Intergroup comparisons were done with mixed-model, repeated measurement analysis of variance and the correlation between the number of robotic procedures and the mean test score were examined. A pass/fail score was established by using the contrasting groups' method.Results: Ten novices, 11 intermediates, and 6 experienced RARP surgeons were included. Six metrics could discriminate between groups and showed acceptable internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's alpha = 0.49, p < 0.001. Test–retest reliability was 0.75, 0.85, and 0.90 for one, two, and three repetitions of tests, respectively. Six metrics were combined into a simulator score that could discriminate between all three groups, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p = 0.029 for novices vs intermediates, novices vs experienced, and intermediates vs experienced, respectively. Total number of robotic operations and the mean score of the three repetitions were significantly correlated, Pearson's r = 0.74, p < 0.001.Conclusion: This study provides validity evidence for a simulator-based test in RARP. We determined a pass/fail level that can be used to ensure competency before proceeding to supervised clinical training.",
author = "Olsen, {Rikke Groth} and Flemming Bjerrum and Lars Konge and Jepsen, {Jan Viberg} and Azawi, {Nessn H.} and Bube, {Sarah Hjartbro}",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2020.0986",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1265--1272",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

AU - Olsen, Rikke Groth

AU - Bjerrum, Flemming

AU - Konge, Lars

AU - Jepsen, Jan Viberg

AU - Azawi, Nessn H.

AU - Bube, Sarah Hjartbro

PY - 2021/8/1

Y1 - 2021/8/1

N2 - Purpose: To investigate validity evidence for a simulator-based test in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Materials and Methods: The test consisted of three modules on the RobotiX Mentor VR-simulator: Bladder Neck Dissection, Neurovascular Bundle Dissection, and Ureterovesical Anastomosis. Validity evidence was investigated by using Messick's framework by including doctors with different RARP experience: novices (who had assisted for RARP), intermediates (robotic surgeons, but not RARP surgeons), or experienced (RARP surgeons). The simulator metrics were analyzed, and Cronbach's alpha and generalizability theory were used to explore reliability. Intergroup comparisons were done with mixed-model, repeated measurement analysis of variance and the correlation between the number of robotic procedures and the mean test score were examined. A pass/fail score was established by using the contrasting groups' method.Results: Ten novices, 11 intermediates, and 6 experienced RARP surgeons were included. Six metrics could discriminate between groups and showed acceptable internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's alpha = 0.49, p < 0.001. Test–retest reliability was 0.75, 0.85, and 0.90 for one, two, and three repetitions of tests, respectively. Six metrics were combined into a simulator score that could discriminate between all three groups, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p = 0.029 for novices vs intermediates, novices vs experienced, and intermediates vs experienced, respectively. Total number of robotic operations and the mean score of the three repetitions were significantly correlated, Pearson's r = 0.74, p < 0.001.Conclusion: This study provides validity evidence for a simulator-based test in RARP. We determined a pass/fail level that can be used to ensure competency before proceeding to supervised clinical training.

AB - Purpose: To investigate validity evidence for a simulator-based test in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Materials and Methods: The test consisted of three modules on the RobotiX Mentor VR-simulator: Bladder Neck Dissection, Neurovascular Bundle Dissection, and Ureterovesical Anastomosis. Validity evidence was investigated by using Messick's framework by including doctors with different RARP experience: novices (who had assisted for RARP), intermediates (robotic surgeons, but not RARP surgeons), or experienced (RARP surgeons). The simulator metrics were analyzed, and Cronbach's alpha and generalizability theory were used to explore reliability. Intergroup comparisons were done with mixed-model, repeated measurement analysis of variance and the correlation between the number of robotic procedures and the mean test score were examined. A pass/fail score was established by using the contrasting groups' method.Results: Ten novices, 11 intermediates, and 6 experienced RARP surgeons were included. Six metrics could discriminate between groups and showed acceptable internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's alpha = 0.49, p < 0.001. Test–retest reliability was 0.75, 0.85, and 0.90 for one, two, and three repetitions of tests, respectively. Six metrics were combined into a simulator score that could discriminate between all three groups, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p = 0.029 for novices vs intermediates, novices vs experienced, and intermediates vs experienced, respectively. Total number of robotic operations and the mean score of the three repetitions were significantly correlated, Pearson's r = 0.74, p < 0.001.Conclusion: This study provides validity evidence for a simulator-based test in RARP. We determined a pass/fail level that can be used to ensure competency before proceeding to supervised clinical training.

U2 - 10.1089/end.2020.0986

DO - 10.1089/end.2020.0986

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33530867

VL - 35

SP - 1265

EP - 1272

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 279630465