Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. / Olsen, Rikke Groth; Bjerrum, Flemming; Konge, Lars; Jepsen, Jan Viberg; Azawi, Nessn H.; Bube, Sarah Hjartbro.
In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 35, No. 8, 01.08.2021, p. 1265-1272.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
AU - Olsen, Rikke Groth
AU - Bjerrum, Flemming
AU - Konge, Lars
AU - Jepsen, Jan Viberg
AU - Azawi, Nessn H.
AU - Bube, Sarah Hjartbro
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - Purpose: To investigate validity evidence for a simulator-based test in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Materials and Methods: The test consisted of three modules on the RobotiX Mentor VR-simulator: Bladder Neck Dissection, Neurovascular Bundle Dissection, and Ureterovesical Anastomosis. Validity evidence was investigated by using Messick's framework by including doctors with different RARP experience: novices (who had assisted for RARP), intermediates (robotic surgeons, but not RARP surgeons), or experienced (RARP surgeons). The simulator metrics were analyzed, and Cronbach's alpha and generalizability theory were used to explore reliability. Intergroup comparisons were done with mixed-model, repeated measurement analysis of variance and the correlation between the number of robotic procedures and the mean test score were examined. A pass/fail score was established by using the contrasting groups' method.Results: Ten novices, 11 intermediates, and 6 experienced RARP surgeons were included. Six metrics could discriminate between groups and showed acceptable internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's alpha = 0.49, p < 0.001. Test–retest reliability was 0.75, 0.85, and 0.90 for one, two, and three repetitions of tests, respectively. Six metrics were combined into a simulator score that could discriminate between all three groups, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p = 0.029 for novices vs intermediates, novices vs experienced, and intermediates vs experienced, respectively. Total number of robotic operations and the mean score of the three repetitions were significantly correlated, Pearson's r = 0.74, p < 0.001.Conclusion: This study provides validity evidence for a simulator-based test in RARP. We determined a pass/fail level that can be used to ensure competency before proceeding to supervised clinical training.
AB - Purpose: To investigate validity evidence for a simulator-based test in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Materials and Methods: The test consisted of three modules on the RobotiX Mentor VR-simulator: Bladder Neck Dissection, Neurovascular Bundle Dissection, and Ureterovesical Anastomosis. Validity evidence was investigated by using Messick's framework by including doctors with different RARP experience: novices (who had assisted for RARP), intermediates (robotic surgeons, but not RARP surgeons), or experienced (RARP surgeons). The simulator metrics were analyzed, and Cronbach's alpha and generalizability theory were used to explore reliability. Intergroup comparisons were done with mixed-model, repeated measurement analysis of variance and the correlation between the number of robotic procedures and the mean test score were examined. A pass/fail score was established by using the contrasting groups' method.Results: Ten novices, 11 intermediates, and 6 experienced RARP surgeons were included. Six metrics could discriminate between groups and showed acceptable internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's alpha = 0.49, p < 0.001. Test–retest reliability was 0.75, 0.85, and 0.90 for one, two, and three repetitions of tests, respectively. Six metrics were combined into a simulator score that could discriminate between all three groups, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p = 0.029 for novices vs intermediates, novices vs experienced, and intermediates vs experienced, respectively. Total number of robotic operations and the mean score of the three repetitions were significantly correlated, Pearson's r = 0.74, p < 0.001.Conclusion: This study provides validity evidence for a simulator-based test in RARP. We determined a pass/fail level that can be used to ensure competency before proceeding to supervised clinical training.
U2 - 10.1089/end.2020.0986
DO - 10.1089/end.2020.0986
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33530867
VL - 35
SP - 1265
EP - 1272
JO - Journal of Endourology
JF - Journal of Endourology
SN - 0892-7790
IS - 8
ER -
ID: 279630465