Use of antipsychotics in Denmark 1997-2018: A nation-wide drug utilisation study with focus on off-label use and associated diagnoses

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Use of antipsychotics in Denmark 1997-2018 : A nation-wide drug utilisation study with focus on off-label use and associated diagnoses. / Højlund, M.; Andersen, J. H.; Andersen, K.; Correll, C. U.; Hallas, J.

In: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, Vol. 30, e28, 2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Højlund, M, Andersen, JH, Andersen, K, Correll, CU & Hallas, J 2021, 'Use of antipsychotics in Denmark 1997-2018: A nation-wide drug utilisation study with focus on off-label use and associated diagnoses', Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, vol. 30, e28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796021000159

APA

Højlund, M., Andersen, J. H., Andersen, K., Correll, C. U., & Hallas, J. (Accepted/In press). Use of antipsychotics in Denmark 1997-2018: A nation-wide drug utilisation study with focus on off-label use and associated diagnoses. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 30, [e28]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796021000159

Vancouver

Højlund M, Andersen JH, Andersen K, Correll CU, Hallas J. Use of antipsychotics in Denmark 1997-2018: A nation-wide drug utilisation study with focus on off-label use and associated diagnoses. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. 2021;30. e28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796021000159

Author

Højlund, M. ; Andersen, J. H. ; Andersen, K. ; Correll, C. U. ; Hallas, J. / Use of antipsychotics in Denmark 1997-2018 : A nation-wide drug utilisation study with focus on off-label use and associated diagnoses. In: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. 2021 ; Vol. 30.

Bibtex

@article{5605835774294d31984cf7120cbde896,
title = "Use of antipsychotics in Denmark 1997-2018: A nation-wide drug utilisation study with focus on off-label use and associated diagnoses",
abstract = "Aims Antipsychotics are primarily labelled for the treatment of severe mental illness and have documented clinical utility in certain neurological disorders or palliative care. However, off-label use of antipsychotics is common and increasing, and prior studies on antipsychotic utilisation have not specifically assessed users in neurology, palliative care or general practice. We aimed to explore diagnoses associated with antipsychotic use, treatment patterns and characteristics of users without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment. Methods Population-based study identifiying all users of antipsychotics in Denmark (pop 5.7 mio.) 1997-2018 in the Danish National Prescription Register (DNPR). Possible indications for antipsychotic therapy were evaluated using in- and outpatient contacts from the DNPR. Users were divided hierarchically into six groups: severe mental disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar-spectrum disorders), chronic mental disorders (dementias, mental retardation, autism), other mental disorders (depression-spectrum, anxiety and personality disorders, etc.), selected neurological diseases, cancer and antipsychotic users without any of these diagnoses. This last group was characterised regarding demographics, antipsychotic use, health care utilisation and likely antipsychotic treatment initiator in 2018. Results Altogether, 630 307 antipsychotic users were identified, of whom 127 649 had filled prescriptions during 2018. Users without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment comprised of the largest group (37%), followed by schizophrenia and bipolar-spectrum disorders (34%), other mental disorders (15%), dementia, autism and mental retardation (11%), cancer (2.2%) and neurological diagnoses (2.0%). Of 37 478 incident users in 2018, 39% had no diagnosis relevant to antipsychotic treatment, 7.9% had major depression, 7.7% neurotic/stress-related disorders and 7.5% dementia. Quetiapine was most commonly used, both overall (51%) and among users without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment (58%). Of 14 474 incident users in 2018 without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment, treatment was most likely initiated by a general practitioner (65%), with only 17% seeing a psychiatrist during the following year. As many as 18% of patients with adjustment disorders and 14% of those without relevant diagnoses for antipsychotic use, remained on antipsychotic treatment 5 years after their first prescription. Conclusions Over one-third of antipsychotic users in Denmark did not have psychiatric, neurological or cancer diagnoses as possible indications for antipsychotic therapy. Many antipsychotics are initiated or prescribed in general practice, and a concerningly large subgroup without documented diagnoses relevant for antipsychotics continued to receive them. Rational prescribing, adequate side effect monitoring and further research into reasons for the observed antipsychotic use patterns and their risk-benefit ratio are needed.",
keywords = "Antipsychotics, off-label, pharmacoepidemiology, quetiapine",
author = "M. H{\o}jlund and Andersen, {J. H.} and K. Andersen and Correll, {C. U.} and J. Hallas",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1017/S2045796021000159",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
journal = "Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences",
issn = "2045-7960",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of antipsychotics in Denmark 1997-2018

T2 - A nation-wide drug utilisation study with focus on off-label use and associated diagnoses

AU - Højlund, M.

AU - Andersen, J. H.

AU - Andersen, K.

AU - Correll, C. U.

AU - Hallas, J.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Aims Antipsychotics are primarily labelled for the treatment of severe mental illness and have documented clinical utility in certain neurological disorders or palliative care. However, off-label use of antipsychotics is common and increasing, and prior studies on antipsychotic utilisation have not specifically assessed users in neurology, palliative care or general practice. We aimed to explore diagnoses associated with antipsychotic use, treatment patterns and characteristics of users without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment. Methods Population-based study identifiying all users of antipsychotics in Denmark (pop 5.7 mio.) 1997-2018 in the Danish National Prescription Register (DNPR). Possible indications for antipsychotic therapy were evaluated using in- and outpatient contacts from the DNPR. Users were divided hierarchically into six groups: severe mental disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar-spectrum disorders), chronic mental disorders (dementias, mental retardation, autism), other mental disorders (depression-spectrum, anxiety and personality disorders, etc.), selected neurological diseases, cancer and antipsychotic users without any of these diagnoses. This last group was characterised regarding demographics, antipsychotic use, health care utilisation and likely antipsychotic treatment initiator in 2018. Results Altogether, 630 307 antipsychotic users were identified, of whom 127 649 had filled prescriptions during 2018. Users without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment comprised of the largest group (37%), followed by schizophrenia and bipolar-spectrum disorders (34%), other mental disorders (15%), dementia, autism and mental retardation (11%), cancer (2.2%) and neurological diagnoses (2.0%). Of 37 478 incident users in 2018, 39% had no diagnosis relevant to antipsychotic treatment, 7.9% had major depression, 7.7% neurotic/stress-related disorders and 7.5% dementia. Quetiapine was most commonly used, both overall (51%) and among users without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment (58%). Of 14 474 incident users in 2018 without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment, treatment was most likely initiated by a general practitioner (65%), with only 17% seeing a psychiatrist during the following year. As many as 18% of patients with adjustment disorders and 14% of those without relevant diagnoses for antipsychotic use, remained on antipsychotic treatment 5 years after their first prescription. Conclusions Over one-third of antipsychotic users in Denmark did not have psychiatric, neurological or cancer diagnoses as possible indications for antipsychotic therapy. Many antipsychotics are initiated or prescribed in general practice, and a concerningly large subgroup without documented diagnoses relevant for antipsychotics continued to receive them. Rational prescribing, adequate side effect monitoring and further research into reasons for the observed antipsychotic use patterns and their risk-benefit ratio are needed.

AB - Aims Antipsychotics are primarily labelled for the treatment of severe mental illness and have documented clinical utility in certain neurological disorders or palliative care. However, off-label use of antipsychotics is common and increasing, and prior studies on antipsychotic utilisation have not specifically assessed users in neurology, palliative care or general practice. We aimed to explore diagnoses associated with antipsychotic use, treatment patterns and characteristics of users without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment. Methods Population-based study identifiying all users of antipsychotics in Denmark (pop 5.7 mio.) 1997-2018 in the Danish National Prescription Register (DNPR). Possible indications for antipsychotic therapy were evaluated using in- and outpatient contacts from the DNPR. Users were divided hierarchically into six groups: severe mental disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar-spectrum disorders), chronic mental disorders (dementias, mental retardation, autism), other mental disorders (depression-spectrum, anxiety and personality disorders, etc.), selected neurological diseases, cancer and antipsychotic users without any of these diagnoses. This last group was characterised regarding demographics, antipsychotic use, health care utilisation and likely antipsychotic treatment initiator in 2018. Results Altogether, 630 307 antipsychotic users were identified, of whom 127 649 had filled prescriptions during 2018. Users without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment comprised of the largest group (37%), followed by schizophrenia and bipolar-spectrum disorders (34%), other mental disorders (15%), dementia, autism and mental retardation (11%), cancer (2.2%) and neurological diagnoses (2.0%). Of 37 478 incident users in 2018, 39% had no diagnosis relevant to antipsychotic treatment, 7.9% had major depression, 7.7% neurotic/stress-related disorders and 7.5% dementia. Quetiapine was most commonly used, both overall (51%) and among users without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment (58%). Of 14 474 incident users in 2018 without diagnoses relevant to antipsychotic treatment, treatment was most likely initiated by a general practitioner (65%), with only 17% seeing a psychiatrist during the following year. As many as 18% of patients with adjustment disorders and 14% of those without relevant diagnoses for antipsychotic use, remained on antipsychotic treatment 5 years after their first prescription. Conclusions Over one-third of antipsychotic users in Denmark did not have psychiatric, neurological or cancer diagnoses as possible indications for antipsychotic therapy. Many antipsychotics are initiated or prescribed in general practice, and a concerningly large subgroup without documented diagnoses relevant for antipsychotics continued to receive them. Rational prescribing, adequate side effect monitoring and further research into reasons for the observed antipsychotic use patterns and their risk-benefit ratio are needed.

KW - Antipsychotics

KW - off-label

KW - pharmacoepidemiology

KW - quetiapine

U2 - 10.1017/S2045796021000159

DO - 10.1017/S2045796021000159

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33820580

AN - SCOPUS:85103717544

VL - 30

JO - Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

JF - Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

SN - 2045-7960

M1 - e28

ER -

ID: 291120575