Treatment intensity and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark: A real-life populationbased study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Treatment intensity and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark : A real-life populationbased study. / Arboe, Bente; Olsen, Maja Halgren; Gørløv, Jette Sønderskov; Duun-Henriksen, Anne Katrine; Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg; Johansen, Christoffer; De Nully Brown, Peter.

In: Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 11, 2019, p. 207-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Arboe, B, Olsen, MH, Gørløv, JS, Duun-Henriksen, AK, Dalton, SO, Johansen, C & De Nully Brown, P 2019, 'Treatment intensity and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark: A real-life populationbased study', Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 11, pp. 207-216. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S178003

APA

Arboe, B., Olsen, M. H., Gørløv, J. S., Duun-Henriksen, A. K., Dalton, S. O., Johansen, C., & De Nully Brown, P. (2019). Treatment intensity and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark: A real-life populationbased study. Clinical Epidemiology, 11, 207-216. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S178003

Vancouver

Arboe B, Olsen MH, Gørløv JS, Duun-Henriksen AK, Dalton SO, Johansen C et al. Treatment intensity and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark: A real-life populationbased study. Clinical Epidemiology. 2019;11:207-216. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S178003

Author

Arboe, Bente ; Olsen, Maja Halgren ; Gørløv, Jette Sønderskov ; Duun-Henriksen, Anne Katrine ; Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg ; Johansen, Christoffer ; De Nully Brown, Peter. / Treatment intensity and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark : A real-life populationbased study. In: Clinical Epidemiology. 2019 ; Vol. 11. pp. 207-216.

Bibtex

@article{f94d64af62134709a85cde8478c523f3,
title = "Treatment intensity and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark: A real-life populationbased study",
abstract = "Purpose: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered to be the only curative treatment option for patients with refractory or relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Due to toxicity, not all patients are eligible for this treatment leading to different treatment intensities. Here, we aim to analyze the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients previously treated with rituximab and chemotherapy, and, furthermore, to analyze the association between socioeconomic position and treatment intensity, defined as palliation, non-salvage, and salvage regimens. Materials and methods: We identified patients with refractory or relapsed DLBCL diagnosed in 2000-2015 in the Danish National Lymphoma Registry (n=1,228). We analyzed the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients previously treated with rituximab (n=277) using a Cox proportional hazards model. Multinomial regression analyses were performed to identify associations between socioeconomic factors and treatment intensity for the entire cohort. Results: In the rituximab era, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 31% for patients receiving salvage regimens (n=194), and 17% for patients receiving non-salvage regimens (n=83). In the adjusted analysis, HR was 1.88, 95% CI: 0.9-3.9 for patients receiving salvage regimens. Patients living alone were significantly less likely to receive salvage regimens, as were patients with two or more comorbidities. Conclusion: We observed a better OS in patients treated with salvage regimens compared with non-salvage regimens; however, the adjusted analysis contradicts this. Furthermore, our results indicate that there is a chance of remission for patients not eligible for ASCT.",
keywords = "Chemotherapy, Education, Epidemiology, Income, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Socioeconomic status, Stem cell transplantation",
author = "Bente Arboe and Olsen, {Maja Halgren} and G{\o}rl{\o}v, {Jette S{\o}nderskov} and Duun-Henriksen, {Anne Katrine} and Dalton, {Susanne Oksbjerg} and Christoffer Johansen and {De Nully Brown}, Peter",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.2147/CLEP.S178003",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "207--216",
journal = "Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "1179-1349",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment intensity and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark

T2 - A real-life populationbased study

AU - Arboe, Bente

AU - Olsen, Maja Halgren

AU - Gørløv, Jette Sønderskov

AU - Duun-Henriksen, Anne Katrine

AU - Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg

AU - Johansen, Christoffer

AU - De Nully Brown, Peter

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Purpose: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered to be the only curative treatment option for patients with refractory or relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Due to toxicity, not all patients are eligible for this treatment leading to different treatment intensities. Here, we aim to analyze the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients previously treated with rituximab and chemotherapy, and, furthermore, to analyze the association between socioeconomic position and treatment intensity, defined as palliation, non-salvage, and salvage regimens. Materials and methods: We identified patients with refractory or relapsed DLBCL diagnosed in 2000-2015 in the Danish National Lymphoma Registry (n=1,228). We analyzed the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients previously treated with rituximab (n=277) using a Cox proportional hazards model. Multinomial regression analyses were performed to identify associations between socioeconomic factors and treatment intensity for the entire cohort. Results: In the rituximab era, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 31% for patients receiving salvage regimens (n=194), and 17% for patients receiving non-salvage regimens (n=83). In the adjusted analysis, HR was 1.88, 95% CI: 0.9-3.9 for patients receiving salvage regimens. Patients living alone were significantly less likely to receive salvage regimens, as were patients with two or more comorbidities. Conclusion: We observed a better OS in patients treated with salvage regimens compared with non-salvage regimens; however, the adjusted analysis contradicts this. Furthermore, our results indicate that there is a chance of remission for patients not eligible for ASCT.

AB - Purpose: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered to be the only curative treatment option for patients with refractory or relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Due to toxicity, not all patients are eligible for this treatment leading to different treatment intensities. Here, we aim to analyze the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients previously treated with rituximab and chemotherapy, and, furthermore, to analyze the association between socioeconomic position and treatment intensity, defined as palliation, non-salvage, and salvage regimens. Materials and methods: We identified patients with refractory or relapsed DLBCL diagnosed in 2000-2015 in the Danish National Lymphoma Registry (n=1,228). We analyzed the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients previously treated with rituximab (n=277) using a Cox proportional hazards model. Multinomial regression analyses were performed to identify associations between socioeconomic factors and treatment intensity for the entire cohort. Results: In the rituximab era, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 31% for patients receiving salvage regimens (n=194), and 17% for patients receiving non-salvage regimens (n=83). In the adjusted analysis, HR was 1.88, 95% CI: 0.9-3.9 for patients receiving salvage regimens. Patients living alone were significantly less likely to receive salvage regimens, as were patients with two or more comorbidities. Conclusion: We observed a better OS in patients treated with salvage regimens compared with non-salvage regimens; however, the adjusted analysis contradicts this. Furthermore, our results indicate that there is a chance of remission for patients not eligible for ASCT.

KW - Chemotherapy

KW - Education

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Income

KW - Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

KW - Socioeconomic status

KW - Stem cell transplantation

U2 - 10.2147/CLEP.S178003

DO - 10.2147/CLEP.S178003

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30881137

AN - SCOPUS:85067545591

VL - 11

SP - 207

EP - 216

JO - Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 1179-1349

ER -

ID: 235918357