The predictive value of ERG protein expression for development of castration-resistant prostate cancer in hormone-naïve advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The predictive value of ERG protein expression for development of castration-resistant prostate cancer in hormone-naïve advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy. / Berg, Kasper Drimer; Røder, Martin A; Thomsen, Frederik B; Vainer, Ben; Gerds, Thomas A; Brasso, Klaus; Iversen, Peter.

In: The Prostate, Vol. 75, No. 14, 10.2015, p. 1499-1509.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Berg, KD, Røder, MA, Thomsen, FB, Vainer, B, Gerds, TA, Brasso, K & Iversen, P 2015, 'The predictive value of ERG protein expression for development of castration-resistant prostate cancer in hormone-naïve advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy', The Prostate, vol. 75, no. 14, pp. 1499-1509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.23026

APA

Berg, K. D., Røder, M. A., Thomsen, F. B., Vainer, B., Gerds, T. A., Brasso, K., & Iversen, P. (2015). The predictive value of ERG protein expression for development of castration-resistant prostate cancer in hormone-naïve advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy. The Prostate, 75(14), 1499-1509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.23026

Vancouver

Berg KD, Røder MA, Thomsen FB, Vainer B, Gerds TA, Brasso K et al. The predictive value of ERG protein expression for development of castration-resistant prostate cancer in hormone-naïve advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy. The Prostate. 2015 Oct;75(14):1499-1509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.23026

Author

Berg, Kasper Drimer ; Røder, Martin A ; Thomsen, Frederik B ; Vainer, Ben ; Gerds, Thomas A ; Brasso, Klaus ; Iversen, Peter. / The predictive value of ERG protein expression for development of castration-resistant prostate cancer in hormone-naïve advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy. In: The Prostate. 2015 ; Vol. 75, No. 14. pp. 1499-1509.

Bibtex

@article{f226565c71b24532a408da70cf42a61d,
title = "The predictive value of ERG protein expression for development of castration-resistant prostate cancer in hormone-na{\"i}ve advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Biomarkers predicting response to primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and risk of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is lacking. We aimed to analyse the predictive value of ERG expression for development of CRPC.METHODS: In total, 194 patients with advanced and/or metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) treated with first-line castration-based ADT were included. ERG protein expression was analysed in diagnostic specimens using immunohistochemistry (anti-ERG, EPR3864). Time to CRPC was compared between ERG subgroups using multiple cause-specific Cox regression stratified on ERG-status. Risk reclassification and time-dependent area under the ROC curves were used to assess the discriminative ability of ERG-status. Time to PSA-nadir, proportion achieving PSA-nadir ≤0.2 ng/ml, and risk of PCa-specific death were secondary endpoints.RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6.8 years (IQR: 4.9-7.3). In total, 105 patients (54.1%) were ERG-positive and 89 (45.9%) were ERG-negative. No difference in risk of CRPC was observed between ERG subgroups (P = 0.51). Median time to CRPC was 3.9 years (95%CI: 3.2-5.1) and 4.5 years (95%CI: 2.3-not reached) in the ERG-positive and ERG-negative group, respectively. Compared to a model omitting ERG-status, the ERG-stratified model showed comparable AUC values 1 year (77.6% vs. 78.0%, P = 0.82), 2 years (71.7% vs. 71.8%, P = 0.85), 5 years (68.5% vs. 69.9%, P = 0.32), and 8 years (67.9% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.21) from ADT initiation. No differences in secondary endpoints were observed.CONCLUSIONS: ERG expression was not associated with risk of CRPC suggesting that ERG is not a candidate biomarker for predicting response to primary ADT in patients diagnosed with advanced and/or metastatic PCa.",
author = "Berg, {Kasper Drimer} and R{\o}der, {Martin A} and Thomsen, {Frederik B} and Ben Vainer and Gerds, {Thomas A} and Klaus Brasso and Peter Iversen",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1002/pros.23026",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "1499--1509",
journal = "The Prostate. Supplement",
issn = "0270-4137",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "14",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The predictive value of ERG protein expression for development of castration-resistant prostate cancer in hormone-naïve advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy

AU - Berg, Kasper Drimer

AU - Røder, Martin A

AU - Thomsen, Frederik B

AU - Vainer, Ben

AU - Gerds, Thomas A

AU - Brasso, Klaus

AU - Iversen, Peter

N1 - © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: Biomarkers predicting response to primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and risk of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is lacking. We aimed to analyse the predictive value of ERG expression for development of CRPC.METHODS: In total, 194 patients with advanced and/or metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) treated with first-line castration-based ADT were included. ERG protein expression was analysed in diagnostic specimens using immunohistochemistry (anti-ERG, EPR3864). Time to CRPC was compared between ERG subgroups using multiple cause-specific Cox regression stratified on ERG-status. Risk reclassification and time-dependent area under the ROC curves were used to assess the discriminative ability of ERG-status. Time to PSA-nadir, proportion achieving PSA-nadir ≤0.2 ng/ml, and risk of PCa-specific death were secondary endpoints.RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6.8 years (IQR: 4.9-7.3). In total, 105 patients (54.1%) were ERG-positive and 89 (45.9%) were ERG-negative. No difference in risk of CRPC was observed between ERG subgroups (P = 0.51). Median time to CRPC was 3.9 years (95%CI: 3.2-5.1) and 4.5 years (95%CI: 2.3-not reached) in the ERG-positive and ERG-negative group, respectively. Compared to a model omitting ERG-status, the ERG-stratified model showed comparable AUC values 1 year (77.6% vs. 78.0%, P = 0.82), 2 years (71.7% vs. 71.8%, P = 0.85), 5 years (68.5% vs. 69.9%, P = 0.32), and 8 years (67.9% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.21) from ADT initiation. No differences in secondary endpoints were observed.CONCLUSIONS: ERG expression was not associated with risk of CRPC suggesting that ERG is not a candidate biomarker for predicting response to primary ADT in patients diagnosed with advanced and/or metastatic PCa.

AB - BACKGROUND: Biomarkers predicting response to primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and risk of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is lacking. We aimed to analyse the predictive value of ERG expression for development of CRPC.METHODS: In total, 194 patients with advanced and/or metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) treated with first-line castration-based ADT were included. ERG protein expression was analysed in diagnostic specimens using immunohistochemistry (anti-ERG, EPR3864). Time to CRPC was compared between ERG subgroups using multiple cause-specific Cox regression stratified on ERG-status. Risk reclassification and time-dependent area under the ROC curves were used to assess the discriminative ability of ERG-status. Time to PSA-nadir, proportion achieving PSA-nadir ≤0.2 ng/ml, and risk of PCa-specific death were secondary endpoints.RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6.8 years (IQR: 4.9-7.3). In total, 105 patients (54.1%) were ERG-positive and 89 (45.9%) were ERG-negative. No difference in risk of CRPC was observed between ERG subgroups (P = 0.51). Median time to CRPC was 3.9 years (95%CI: 3.2-5.1) and 4.5 years (95%CI: 2.3-not reached) in the ERG-positive and ERG-negative group, respectively. Compared to a model omitting ERG-status, the ERG-stratified model showed comparable AUC values 1 year (77.6% vs. 78.0%, P = 0.82), 2 years (71.7% vs. 71.8%, P = 0.85), 5 years (68.5% vs. 69.9%, P = 0.32), and 8 years (67.9% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.21) from ADT initiation. No differences in secondary endpoints were observed.CONCLUSIONS: ERG expression was not associated with risk of CRPC suggesting that ERG is not a candidate biomarker for predicting response to primary ADT in patients diagnosed with advanced and/or metastatic PCa.

U2 - 10.1002/pros.23026

DO - 10.1002/pros.23026

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26053696

VL - 75

SP - 1499

EP - 1509

JO - The Prostate. Supplement

JF - The Prostate. Supplement

SN - 0270-4137

IS - 14

ER -

ID: 143144384