Specialized Outpatient Clinic vs Stroke Unit for TIA and Minor Stroke A Cohort Study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Specialized Outpatient Clinic vs Stroke Unit for TIA and Minor Stroke A Cohort Study. / Hastrup, Sidsel; Johnsen, Soren P.; Jensen, Martin; von Weitzel-Mudersbach, Paul; Simonsen, Claus Z.; Hjort, Niels; Moller, Anette T.; Harbo, Thomas; Poulsen, Marika S.; Iversen, Helle K.; Damgaard, Dorte; Andersen, Grethe.

In: Neurology, Vol. 96, No. 8, 2021, p. E1096-E1109.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hastrup, S, Johnsen, SP, Jensen, M, von Weitzel-Mudersbach, P, Simonsen, CZ, Hjort, N, Moller, AT, Harbo, T, Poulsen, MS, Iversen, HK, Damgaard, D & Andersen, G 2021, 'Specialized Outpatient Clinic vs Stroke Unit for TIA and Minor Stroke A Cohort Study', Neurology, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. E1096-E1109. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011453

APA

Hastrup, S., Johnsen, S. P., Jensen, M., von Weitzel-Mudersbach, P., Simonsen, C. Z., Hjort, N., Moller, A. T., Harbo, T., Poulsen, M. S., Iversen, H. K., Damgaard, D., & Andersen, G. (2021). Specialized Outpatient Clinic vs Stroke Unit for TIA and Minor Stroke A Cohort Study. Neurology, 96(8), E1096-E1109. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011453

Vancouver

Hastrup S, Johnsen SP, Jensen M, von Weitzel-Mudersbach P, Simonsen CZ, Hjort N et al. Specialized Outpatient Clinic vs Stroke Unit for TIA and Minor Stroke A Cohort Study. Neurology. 2021;96(8):E1096-E1109. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011453

Author

Hastrup, Sidsel ; Johnsen, Soren P. ; Jensen, Martin ; von Weitzel-Mudersbach, Paul ; Simonsen, Claus Z. ; Hjort, Niels ; Moller, Anette T. ; Harbo, Thomas ; Poulsen, Marika S. ; Iversen, Helle K. ; Damgaard, Dorte ; Andersen, Grethe. / Specialized Outpatient Clinic vs Stroke Unit for TIA and Minor Stroke A Cohort Study. In: Neurology. 2021 ; Vol. 96, No. 8. pp. E1096-E1109.

Bibtex

@article{e7ca2e7193984cf8aeebcc4bf1bfbf1b,
title = "Specialized Outpatient Clinic vs Stroke Unit for TIA and Minor Stroke A Cohort Study",
abstract = "ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of an outpatient clinic setup for minor stroke/TIA using subsequent admission of patients at high risk of recurrent stroke.MethodsWe performed a cohort study of all patients with suspected minor stroke/TIA seen in an outpatient clinic at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between September 2013 and August 2014. Patients with stroke were compared to historic (same hospital) and contemporary (another comparable hospital) matched, hospitalized controls on nonprioritized outcomes: length of stay, readmissions, care quality (10 process-performance measures), and mortality. Patients with TIA were compared to contemporary matched, hospitalized controls. Following complete diagnostic workup, patients with stroke/TIA were classified into low/high risk of recurrent stroke =7 days.ResultsWe analyzed 1,076 consecutive patients, of whom 253 (23.5%) were subsequently admitted to the stroke ward. Stroke/TIA was diagnosed in 215/171 patients, respectively. Fifty-six percent (121/215) of the patients with stroke were subsequently admitted to the stroke ward. Comparison with the historic stroke cohort (n = 191) showed a shorter acute hospital stay for the strokes (median 1 vs 3 days; adjusted length of stay ratio 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.71). Thirty-day readmission rate was 3.2% vs 11.6% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.23 [0.09-0.59]), and care quality was higher, with a risk ratio of 1.30 (1.15-1.47). The comparison of stroke and TIAs to contemporary controls showed similar results. Only one patient in the low risk category and not admitted experienced stroke within 7 days (0.6%).ConclusionsAn outpatient clinic setup for patients with minor stroke/TIA yields shorter acute hospital stay, lower readmission rates, and better quality than hospitalization in stroke units.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that a neurovascular specialist-driven outpatient clinic for patients with minor stroke/TIA with the ability of subsequent admission is safe and yields shorter acute hospital stay, lower readmission rates, and better quality than hospitalization in stroke units.",
keywords = "TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK, EARLY RISK, URGENT TREATMENT, ABCD2 SCORE, CARE, POPULATION, COST, FEASIBILITY, PERFORMANCE, PREVALENCE",
author = "Sidsel Hastrup and Johnsen, {Soren P.} and Martin Jensen and {von Weitzel-Mudersbach}, Paul and Simonsen, {Claus Z.} and Niels Hjort and Moller, {Anette T.} and Thomas Harbo and Poulsen, {Marika S.} and Iversen, {Helle K.} and Dorte Damgaard and Grethe Andersen",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1212/WNL.0000000000011453",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "E1096--E1109",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specialized Outpatient Clinic vs Stroke Unit for TIA and Minor Stroke A Cohort Study

AU - Hastrup, Sidsel

AU - Johnsen, Soren P.

AU - Jensen, Martin

AU - von Weitzel-Mudersbach, Paul

AU - Simonsen, Claus Z.

AU - Hjort, Niels

AU - Moller, Anette T.

AU - Harbo, Thomas

AU - Poulsen, Marika S.

AU - Iversen, Helle K.

AU - Damgaard, Dorte

AU - Andersen, Grethe

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of an outpatient clinic setup for minor stroke/TIA using subsequent admission of patients at high risk of recurrent stroke.MethodsWe performed a cohort study of all patients with suspected minor stroke/TIA seen in an outpatient clinic at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between September 2013 and August 2014. Patients with stroke were compared to historic (same hospital) and contemporary (another comparable hospital) matched, hospitalized controls on nonprioritized outcomes: length of stay, readmissions, care quality (10 process-performance measures), and mortality. Patients with TIA were compared to contemporary matched, hospitalized controls. Following complete diagnostic workup, patients with stroke/TIA were classified into low/high risk of recurrent stroke =7 days.ResultsWe analyzed 1,076 consecutive patients, of whom 253 (23.5%) were subsequently admitted to the stroke ward. Stroke/TIA was diagnosed in 215/171 patients, respectively. Fifty-six percent (121/215) of the patients with stroke were subsequently admitted to the stroke ward. Comparison with the historic stroke cohort (n = 191) showed a shorter acute hospital stay for the strokes (median 1 vs 3 days; adjusted length of stay ratio 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.71). Thirty-day readmission rate was 3.2% vs 11.6% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.23 [0.09-0.59]), and care quality was higher, with a risk ratio of 1.30 (1.15-1.47). The comparison of stroke and TIAs to contemporary controls showed similar results. Only one patient in the low risk category and not admitted experienced stroke within 7 days (0.6%).ConclusionsAn outpatient clinic setup for patients with minor stroke/TIA yields shorter acute hospital stay, lower readmission rates, and better quality than hospitalization in stroke units.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that a neurovascular specialist-driven outpatient clinic for patients with minor stroke/TIA with the ability of subsequent admission is safe and yields shorter acute hospital stay, lower readmission rates, and better quality than hospitalization in stroke units.

AB - ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of an outpatient clinic setup for minor stroke/TIA using subsequent admission of patients at high risk of recurrent stroke.MethodsWe performed a cohort study of all patients with suspected minor stroke/TIA seen in an outpatient clinic at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between September 2013 and August 2014. Patients with stroke were compared to historic (same hospital) and contemporary (another comparable hospital) matched, hospitalized controls on nonprioritized outcomes: length of stay, readmissions, care quality (10 process-performance measures), and mortality. Patients with TIA were compared to contemporary matched, hospitalized controls. Following complete diagnostic workup, patients with stroke/TIA were classified into low/high risk of recurrent stroke =7 days.ResultsWe analyzed 1,076 consecutive patients, of whom 253 (23.5%) were subsequently admitted to the stroke ward. Stroke/TIA was diagnosed in 215/171 patients, respectively. Fifty-six percent (121/215) of the patients with stroke were subsequently admitted to the stroke ward. Comparison with the historic stroke cohort (n = 191) showed a shorter acute hospital stay for the strokes (median 1 vs 3 days; adjusted length of stay ratio 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.71). Thirty-day readmission rate was 3.2% vs 11.6% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.23 [0.09-0.59]), and care quality was higher, with a risk ratio of 1.30 (1.15-1.47). The comparison of stroke and TIAs to contemporary controls showed similar results. Only one patient in the low risk category and not admitted experienced stroke within 7 days (0.6%).ConclusionsAn outpatient clinic setup for patients with minor stroke/TIA yields shorter acute hospital stay, lower readmission rates, and better quality than hospitalization in stroke units.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that a neurovascular specialist-driven outpatient clinic for patients with minor stroke/TIA with the ability of subsequent admission is safe and yields shorter acute hospital stay, lower readmission rates, and better quality than hospitalization in stroke units.

KW - TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK

KW - EARLY RISK

KW - URGENT TREATMENT

KW - ABCD2 SCORE

KW - CARE

KW - POPULATION

KW - COST

KW - FEASIBILITY

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - PREVALENCE

U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011453

DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011453

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33472916

VL - 96

SP - E1096-E1109

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 304155558