Seeing Me, Seeing You: Testing Competing Accounts of Assumed Similarity in Personality Judgments

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Seeing Me, Seeing You : Testing Competing Accounts of Assumed Similarity in Personality Judgments. / Thielmann, Isabel; Hilbig, Benjamin E.; Zettler, Ingo.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 118, No. 1, 2020, p. 172–198.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Thielmann, I, Hilbig, BE & Zettler, I 2020, 'Seeing Me, Seeing You: Testing Competing Accounts of Assumed Similarity in Personality Judgments', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 172–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000222

APA

Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2020). Seeing Me, Seeing You: Testing Competing Accounts of Assumed Similarity in Personality Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 172–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000222

Vancouver

Thielmann I, Hilbig BE, Zettler I. Seeing Me, Seeing You: Testing Competing Accounts of Assumed Similarity in Personality Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2020;118(1):172–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000222

Author

Thielmann, Isabel ; Hilbig, Benjamin E. ; Zettler, Ingo. / Seeing Me, Seeing You : Testing Competing Accounts of Assumed Similarity in Personality Judgments. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2020 ; Vol. 118, No. 1. pp. 172–198.

Bibtex

@article{fe631108a8664b49ab9521cabacc2738,
title = "Seeing Me, Seeing You: Testing Competing Accounts of Assumed Similarity in Personality Judgments",
abstract = "A recurrent observation in personality judgments is that individuals' ratings of others' personalities are positively linked to their self-description, and that such {"}assumed similarity{"} effects appear to be trait-specific. However, the extent of and explanations for assumed similarity have been addressed only insufficiently. To close this gap, we first provide a meta-analytic summary of evidence on assumed similarity of basic personality traits. More importantly, we then critically test different theoretical accounts of assumed similarity (i.e., lack of information, relation to personal values, and known/spurious similarity) in nine studies. Specifically, we investigated assumed similarity of the HEXACO personality traits among strangers, using tailored experimental tests tackling the different theoretical accounts. Across studies, we consistently found the strongest assumed similarity effects for those traits being most strongly linked to personal values: Honesty-Humility and (albeit somewhat weaker) Openness to Experience. For the remaining traits, no consistent evidence for assumed similarity occurred, even when raters had very limited information about the target person. This contradicts that assumed similarity reflects a lack-of-information effect. In turn, the findings could also neither be accounted for by actual similarity, nor by a shared group membership (i.e., spurious similarity) between rater and target. Overall, our studies support the idea that assumed similarity of basic traits is closely tied to personal values and suggest that this finding is attributable to the high personal relevance of value-related traits. This implies that assumed similarity reflects the assumption that others share basic parts of one's identity, even if these others are complete strangers.",
keywords = "Assumed similarity, HEXACO, Personal values, Personality judgments, Self-relevance",
author = "Isabel Thielmann and Hilbig, {Benjamin E.} and Ingo Zettler",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1037/pspp0000222",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "172–198",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing Me, Seeing You

T2 - Testing Competing Accounts of Assumed Similarity in Personality Judgments

AU - Thielmann, Isabel

AU - Hilbig, Benjamin E.

AU - Zettler, Ingo

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - A recurrent observation in personality judgments is that individuals' ratings of others' personalities are positively linked to their self-description, and that such "assumed similarity" effects appear to be trait-specific. However, the extent of and explanations for assumed similarity have been addressed only insufficiently. To close this gap, we first provide a meta-analytic summary of evidence on assumed similarity of basic personality traits. More importantly, we then critically test different theoretical accounts of assumed similarity (i.e., lack of information, relation to personal values, and known/spurious similarity) in nine studies. Specifically, we investigated assumed similarity of the HEXACO personality traits among strangers, using tailored experimental tests tackling the different theoretical accounts. Across studies, we consistently found the strongest assumed similarity effects for those traits being most strongly linked to personal values: Honesty-Humility and (albeit somewhat weaker) Openness to Experience. For the remaining traits, no consistent evidence for assumed similarity occurred, even when raters had very limited information about the target person. This contradicts that assumed similarity reflects a lack-of-information effect. In turn, the findings could also neither be accounted for by actual similarity, nor by a shared group membership (i.e., spurious similarity) between rater and target. Overall, our studies support the idea that assumed similarity of basic traits is closely tied to personal values and suggest that this finding is attributable to the high personal relevance of value-related traits. This implies that assumed similarity reflects the assumption that others share basic parts of one's identity, even if these others are complete strangers.

AB - A recurrent observation in personality judgments is that individuals' ratings of others' personalities are positively linked to their self-description, and that such "assumed similarity" effects appear to be trait-specific. However, the extent of and explanations for assumed similarity have been addressed only insufficiently. To close this gap, we first provide a meta-analytic summary of evidence on assumed similarity of basic personality traits. More importantly, we then critically test different theoretical accounts of assumed similarity (i.e., lack of information, relation to personal values, and known/spurious similarity) in nine studies. Specifically, we investigated assumed similarity of the HEXACO personality traits among strangers, using tailored experimental tests tackling the different theoretical accounts. Across studies, we consistently found the strongest assumed similarity effects for those traits being most strongly linked to personal values: Honesty-Humility and (albeit somewhat weaker) Openness to Experience. For the remaining traits, no consistent evidence for assumed similarity occurred, even when raters had very limited information about the target person. This contradicts that assumed similarity reflects a lack-of-information effect. In turn, the findings could also neither be accounted for by actual similarity, nor by a shared group membership (i.e., spurious similarity) between rater and target. Overall, our studies support the idea that assumed similarity of basic traits is closely tied to personal values and suggest that this finding is attributable to the high personal relevance of value-related traits. This implies that assumed similarity reflects the assumption that others share basic parts of one's identity, even if these others are complete strangers.

KW - Assumed similarity

KW - HEXACO

KW - Personal values

KW - Personality judgments

KW - Self-relevance

U2 - 10.1037/pspp0000222

DO - 10.1037/pspp0000222

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30321044

AN - SCOPUS:85051730833

VL - 118

SP - 172

EP - 198

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 204531406