Routine vs on-demand blood sampling in critically ill patients—Protocol for a scoping review
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Routine vs on-demand blood sampling in critically ill patients—Protocol for a scoping review. / Hjortsø, Carl Johan S.; Brøchner, Anne C.; Perner, Anders; Møller, Morten H.
In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 63, No. 8, 09.2019, p. 1109-1112.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Routine vs on-demand blood sampling in critically ill patients—Protocol for a scoping review
AU - Hjortsø, Carl Johan S.
AU - Brøchner, Anne C.
AU - Perner, Anders
AU - Møller, Morten H.
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Background: In intensive care units, blood sampling is done commonly as part of daily routine. It remains unknown whether this practice is associated with harms or benefits, as not all routine blood tests may be clinically indicated, and blood sampling done without specific indications may be problematic. Accordingly, we aim to assess the body of evidence regarding the usage of routine vs on-demand blood sampling in critically ill patients in a scoping review. Methods: We will conduct a scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement as well as the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Using a PICO-based search strategy, we will systematically search the Cochrane Library, Embase and Medline for relevant studies regardless of design. Two authors will independently screen studies for inclusion and extract data. We will provide a descriptive analysis of the data and asses the quality of evidence in accordance with the Grading of Recommended Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Discussion: The outlined scoping review will provide an important overview on the current body of evidence regarding the use of daily routine vs on-demand blood sampling in critical care settings. The findings of this scoping review will guide further research.
AB - Background: In intensive care units, blood sampling is done commonly as part of daily routine. It remains unknown whether this practice is associated with harms or benefits, as not all routine blood tests may be clinically indicated, and blood sampling done without specific indications may be problematic. Accordingly, we aim to assess the body of evidence regarding the usage of routine vs on-demand blood sampling in critically ill patients in a scoping review. Methods: We will conduct a scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement as well as the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Using a PICO-based search strategy, we will systematically search the Cochrane Library, Embase and Medline for relevant studies regardless of design. Two authors will independently screen studies for inclusion and extract data. We will provide a descriptive analysis of the data and asses the quality of evidence in accordance with the Grading of Recommended Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Discussion: The outlined scoping review will provide an important overview on the current body of evidence regarding the use of daily routine vs on-demand blood sampling in critical care settings. The findings of this scoping review will guide further research.
U2 - 10.1111/aas.13417
DO - 10.1111/aas.13417
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31206584
AN - SCOPUS:85067668944
VL - 63
SP - 1109
EP - 1112
JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
SN - 0001-5172
IS - 8
ER -
ID: 240743692