Researchers in cardiology – Why and how to get on Twitter?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Standard

Researchers in cardiology – Why and how to get on Twitter? / Benjamin Fyenbo, Daniel; Charlotte Frederiksen, Tanja; Linz, Dominik; Jespersen, Thomas; Dobrev, Dobromir; Gislason, Gunnar; Betz, Konstanze; Saljic, Arnela; Nielsen Holck, Emil.

In: IJC Heart and Vasculature, Vol. 40, 101010, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Benjamin Fyenbo, D, Charlotte Frederiksen, T, Linz, D, Jespersen, T, Dobrev, D, Gislason, G, Betz, K, Saljic, A & Nielsen Holck, E 2022, 'Researchers in cardiology – Why and how to get on Twitter?', IJC Heart and Vasculature, vol. 40, 101010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101010

APA

Benjamin Fyenbo, D., Charlotte Frederiksen, T., Linz, D., Jespersen, T., Dobrev, D., Gislason, G., Betz, K., Saljic, A., & Nielsen Holck, E. (2022). Researchers in cardiology – Why and how to get on Twitter? IJC Heart and Vasculature, 40, [101010]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101010

Vancouver

Benjamin Fyenbo D, Charlotte Frederiksen T, Linz D, Jespersen T, Dobrev D, Gislason G et al. Researchers in cardiology – Why and how to get on Twitter? IJC Heart and Vasculature. 2022;40. 101010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101010

Author

Benjamin Fyenbo, Daniel ; Charlotte Frederiksen, Tanja ; Linz, Dominik ; Jespersen, Thomas ; Dobrev, Dobromir ; Gislason, Gunnar ; Betz, Konstanze ; Saljic, Arnela ; Nielsen Holck, Emil. / Researchers in cardiology – Why and how to get on Twitter?. In: IJC Heart and Vasculature. 2022 ; Vol. 40.

Bibtex

@article{3b5889c8bbb34c89a655e01932e24868,
title = "Researchers in cardiology – Why and how to get on Twitter?",
abstract = "Social media (SoMe) for professional use has gained importance for scientific impact. In cardiology, Twitter is among the preferred SoMe platforms for scientific dissemination. We are in the middle of a paradigm shift within scientific dissemination as more scientific content is presented on Twitter, and it is crucial to embrace it. Therefore, this paper includes a description and discussion of the existing literature reporting the impact of Twitter on research dissemination, as well as a guide on how to get started. In addition, we describe a case of the Danish Cardiovascular Academy Summer Meeting 2021 as an example of a scientific event that was promoted on Twitter before, during and after the event and present a survey showing that participants were inspired to increase the use of SoMe professionally. Finally, the paper addresses limitations of Twitter and SoMe for scientific use and discuss a need for an increased evidence base.",
keywords = "Cardiology, Dissemination, Social media, Tweetorial, Twitter, Twitter-based Journal Club",
author = "{Benjamin Fyenbo}, Daniel and {Charlotte Frederiksen}, Tanja and Dominik Linz and Thomas Jespersen and Dobromir Dobrev and Gunnar Gislason and Konstanze Betz and Arnela Saljic and {Nielsen Holck}, Emil",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101010",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
journal = "IJC Heart and Vasculature",
issn = "2352-9067",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Researchers in cardiology – Why and how to get on Twitter?

AU - Benjamin Fyenbo, Daniel

AU - Charlotte Frederiksen, Tanja

AU - Linz, Dominik

AU - Jespersen, Thomas

AU - Dobrev, Dobromir

AU - Gislason, Gunnar

AU - Betz, Konstanze

AU - Saljic, Arnela

AU - Nielsen Holck, Emil

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Social media (SoMe) for professional use has gained importance for scientific impact. In cardiology, Twitter is among the preferred SoMe platforms for scientific dissemination. We are in the middle of a paradigm shift within scientific dissemination as more scientific content is presented on Twitter, and it is crucial to embrace it. Therefore, this paper includes a description and discussion of the existing literature reporting the impact of Twitter on research dissemination, as well as a guide on how to get started. In addition, we describe a case of the Danish Cardiovascular Academy Summer Meeting 2021 as an example of a scientific event that was promoted on Twitter before, during and after the event and present a survey showing that participants were inspired to increase the use of SoMe professionally. Finally, the paper addresses limitations of Twitter and SoMe for scientific use and discuss a need for an increased evidence base.

AB - Social media (SoMe) for professional use has gained importance for scientific impact. In cardiology, Twitter is among the preferred SoMe platforms for scientific dissemination. We are in the middle of a paradigm shift within scientific dissemination as more scientific content is presented on Twitter, and it is crucial to embrace it. Therefore, this paper includes a description and discussion of the existing literature reporting the impact of Twitter on research dissemination, as well as a guide on how to get started. In addition, we describe a case of the Danish Cardiovascular Academy Summer Meeting 2021 as an example of a scientific event that was promoted on Twitter before, during and after the event and present a survey showing that participants were inspired to increase the use of SoMe professionally. Finally, the paper addresses limitations of Twitter and SoMe for scientific use and discuss a need for an increased evidence base.

KW - Cardiology

KW - Dissemination

KW - Social media

KW - Tweetorial

KW - Twitter

KW - Twitter-based Journal Club

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101010

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101010

M3 - Review

C2 - 35372661

AN - SCOPUS:85127162775

VL - 40

JO - IJC Heart and Vasculature

JF - IJC Heart and Vasculature

SN - 2352-9067

M1 - 101010

ER -

ID: 308162806