Relationship between heart failure, concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and beta-blocker use: A Danish nationwide cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Relationship between heart failure, concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and beta-blocker use : A Danish nationwide cohort study. / Sessa, Maurizio; Mascolo, Annamaria; Mortensen, Rikke Nørmark; Andersen, Mikkel Porsborg; Rosano, Giuseppe Massimo Claudio; Capuano, Annalisa; Rossi, Francesco; Gislason, Gunnar; Enghusen-Poulsen, Henrik; Torp-Pedersen, Christian.

In: European Journal of Heart Failure, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2018, p. 548-556.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Sessa, M, Mascolo, A, Mortensen, RN, Andersen, MP, Rosano, GMC, Capuano, A, Rossi, F, Gislason, G, Enghusen-Poulsen, H & Torp-Pedersen, C 2018, 'Relationship between heart failure, concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and beta-blocker use: A Danish nationwide cohort study', European Journal of Heart Failure, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 548-556. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1045

APA

Sessa, M., Mascolo, A., Mortensen, R. N., Andersen, M. P., Rosano, G. M. C., Capuano, A., Rossi, F., Gislason, G., Enghusen-Poulsen, H., & Torp-Pedersen, C. (2018). Relationship between heart failure, concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and beta-blocker use: A Danish nationwide cohort study. European Journal of Heart Failure, 20(3), 548-556. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1045

Vancouver

Sessa M, Mascolo A, Mortensen RN, Andersen MP, Rosano GMC, Capuano A et al. Relationship between heart failure, concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and beta-blocker use: A Danish nationwide cohort study. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2018;20(3):548-556. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1045

Author

Sessa, Maurizio ; Mascolo, Annamaria ; Mortensen, Rikke Nørmark ; Andersen, Mikkel Porsborg ; Rosano, Giuseppe Massimo Claudio ; Capuano, Annalisa ; Rossi, Francesco ; Gislason, Gunnar ; Enghusen-Poulsen, Henrik ; Torp-Pedersen, Christian. / Relationship between heart failure, concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and beta-blocker use : A Danish nationwide cohort study. In: European Journal of Heart Failure. 2018 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 548-556.

Bibtex

@article{b768228c0a8a41f99e1a47a384e8460a,
title = "Relationship between heart failure, concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and beta-blocker use: A Danish nationwide cohort study",
abstract = "Aims: To compare the hazard of all-cause, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF) hospitalization in carvedilol vs. metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users with COPD and concurrent HF from 2009 to 2012, and to evaluate the use and persistence in treatment of these β-blockers, their impact on the risk of COPD-related hospitalization, and the factors important for their selection. Methods and results: Cox and logistic regression were used for both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Carvedilol users had a higher hazard of being hospitalized for HF compared with metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users in both the unadjusted [hazard ratio (HR) 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-1.83] and adjusted (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.52-1.70) analyses. No significant differences were found for all-cause and COPD hospitalization between the two groups. Carvedilol users had a significant lower restricted mean persistence time than metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users. Patients exposed to carvedilol had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.38 (95% CI 1.23-1.56) for being hospitalized due to COPD within 60days after redeeming the first carvedilol prescription, which was similar to that observed in metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.27-1.48). Patients with concurrent chronic kidney disease had a higher probability of receiving carvedilol (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.04-1.29). Conclusion: Carvedilol prescription carried an increased hazard of HF hospitalization and lower restricted mean persistence time among patients with COPD and concurrent HF. Additionally, we found a widespread phenomenon of carvedilol prescription at variance with the European Society of Cardiology guidelines and potential for improving the proportion of patients treated with β-blockers.",
keywords = "Carvedilol, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Clinical guidelines, Denmark, Heart failure, Hospitalization, Non-cardio-selective β-blockers",
author = "Maurizio Sessa and Annamaria Mascolo and Mortensen, {Rikke N{\o}rmark} and Andersen, {Mikkel Porsborg} and Rosano, {Giuseppe Massimo Claudio} and Annalisa Capuano and Francesco Rossi and Gunnar Gislason and Henrik Enghusen-Poulsen and Christian Torp-Pedersen",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1002/ejhf.1045",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "548--556",
journal = "European Journal of Heart Failure",
issn = "1567-4215",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between heart failure, concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and beta-blocker use

T2 - A Danish nationwide cohort study

AU - Sessa, Maurizio

AU - Mascolo, Annamaria

AU - Mortensen, Rikke Nørmark

AU - Andersen, Mikkel Porsborg

AU - Rosano, Giuseppe Massimo Claudio

AU - Capuano, Annalisa

AU - Rossi, Francesco

AU - Gislason, Gunnar

AU - Enghusen-Poulsen, Henrik

AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Aims: To compare the hazard of all-cause, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF) hospitalization in carvedilol vs. metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users with COPD and concurrent HF from 2009 to 2012, and to evaluate the use and persistence in treatment of these β-blockers, their impact on the risk of COPD-related hospitalization, and the factors important for their selection. Methods and results: Cox and logistic regression were used for both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Carvedilol users had a higher hazard of being hospitalized for HF compared with metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users in both the unadjusted [hazard ratio (HR) 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-1.83] and adjusted (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.52-1.70) analyses. No significant differences were found for all-cause and COPD hospitalization between the two groups. Carvedilol users had a significant lower restricted mean persistence time than metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users. Patients exposed to carvedilol had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.38 (95% CI 1.23-1.56) for being hospitalized due to COPD within 60days after redeeming the first carvedilol prescription, which was similar to that observed in metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.27-1.48). Patients with concurrent chronic kidney disease had a higher probability of receiving carvedilol (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.04-1.29). Conclusion: Carvedilol prescription carried an increased hazard of HF hospitalization and lower restricted mean persistence time among patients with COPD and concurrent HF. Additionally, we found a widespread phenomenon of carvedilol prescription at variance with the European Society of Cardiology guidelines and potential for improving the proportion of patients treated with β-blockers.

AB - Aims: To compare the hazard of all-cause, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF) hospitalization in carvedilol vs. metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users with COPD and concurrent HF from 2009 to 2012, and to evaluate the use and persistence in treatment of these β-blockers, their impact on the risk of COPD-related hospitalization, and the factors important for their selection. Methods and results: Cox and logistic regression were used for both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Carvedilol users had a higher hazard of being hospitalized for HF compared with metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users in both the unadjusted [hazard ratio (HR) 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-1.83] and adjusted (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.52-1.70) analyses. No significant differences were found for all-cause and COPD hospitalization between the two groups. Carvedilol users had a significant lower restricted mean persistence time than metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users. Patients exposed to carvedilol had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.38 (95% CI 1.23-1.56) for being hospitalized due to COPD within 60days after redeeming the first carvedilol prescription, which was similar to that observed in metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.27-1.48). Patients with concurrent chronic kidney disease had a higher probability of receiving carvedilol (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.04-1.29). Conclusion: Carvedilol prescription carried an increased hazard of HF hospitalization and lower restricted mean persistence time among patients with COPD and concurrent HF. Additionally, we found a widespread phenomenon of carvedilol prescription at variance with the European Society of Cardiology guidelines and potential for improving the proportion of patients treated with β-blockers.

KW - Carvedilol

KW - Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

KW - Clinical guidelines

KW - Denmark

KW - Heart failure

KW - Hospitalization

KW - Non-cardio-selective β-blockers

U2 - 10.1002/ejhf.1045

DO - 10.1002/ejhf.1045

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29159953

AN - SCOPUS:85034565715

VL - 20

SP - 548

EP - 556

JO - European Journal of Heart Failure

JF - European Journal of Heart Failure

SN - 1567-4215

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 189629007