Real-world, long-term effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: Subgroup analyses of the REACT study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Real-world, long-term effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis : Subgroup analyses of the REACT study. / Contoli, Marco; Porsbjerg, Celeste; Buchs, Sarah; Larsen, Julie Rask; Freemantle, Nick; Fritzsching, Benedikt.

In: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 152, No. 2, 2023, p. 445-452.e4.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Contoli, M, Porsbjerg, C, Buchs, S, Larsen, JR, Freemantle, N & Fritzsching, B 2023, 'Real-world, long-term effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: Subgroup analyses of the REACT study', Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 445-452.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2023.02.024

APA

Contoli, M., Porsbjerg, C., Buchs, S., Larsen, J. R., Freemantle, N., & Fritzsching, B. (2023). Real-world, long-term effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: Subgroup analyses of the REACT study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 152(2), 445-452.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2023.02.024

Vancouver

Contoli M, Porsbjerg C, Buchs S, Larsen JR, Freemantle N, Fritzsching B. Real-world, long-term effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: Subgroup analyses of the REACT study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2023;152(2):445-452.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2023.02.024

Author

Contoli, Marco ; Porsbjerg, Celeste ; Buchs, Sarah ; Larsen, Julie Rask ; Freemantle, Nick ; Fritzsching, Benedikt. / Real-world, long-term effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis : Subgroup analyses of the REACT study. In: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2023 ; Vol. 152, No. 2. pp. 445-452.e4.

Bibtex

@article{04968077ba464ffe9fc2b6077f78d523,
title = "Real-world, long-term effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: Subgroup analyses of the REACT study",
abstract = "Background: Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of allergy immunotherapy (AIT) in allergic rhinitis (AR) and the disease-modifying effects of the SQ grass sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet. Objective: We sought to assess real-world, long-term effectiveness and safety across AIT subgroups: route of administration, therapeutic allergen, persistence to AIT, and SQ grass SLIT tablet. Methods: The primary outcome of AR prescriptions from a retrospective cohort study (REAl-world effeCtiveness in allergy immunoTherapy; 2007-2017) was assessed across prespecified AIT subgroups in subjects with AR with and without AIT prescriptions (controls). Safety was assessed as anaphylaxis for 2 days or less of the first AIT prescription. Subgroup follow-up continued until samples were fewer than 200 subjects. Results: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and SLIT tablets showed similarly greater reductions in AR prescriptions than controls (SCIT vs SLIT tablets: year 3, P = .15; year 5, P = .43). Comparably greater reductions in AR prescriptions were observed for grass- and house dust mite–specific AIT than for controls, but significantly smaller reductions were observed for tree-specific AIT (tree vs house dust mite, and vs grass: years 3 and 5, P < .0001). Persistence to AIT was associated with greater reductions in AR prescriptions versus nonpersistence (persistence vs nonpersistence: year 3, P = .09; year 5, P = .006). SQ grass SLIT tablet showed sustained reductions versus controls for up to 7 years (year 3, P = .002; year 5, P = .03). Rates of anaphylactic shock were low (0.000%-0.092%), with no events for SQ SLIT tablets. Conclusions: These results demonstrate real-world, long-term effectiveness of AIT, complement disease-modifying effects observed in SQ grass SLIT-tablet randomized controlled trials, and highlight the importance of using newer evidence-based AIT products for tree pollen AR.",
keywords = "Allergic rhinitis, allergy immunotherapy, cohort study, effectiveness, REACT, real-world evidence, retrospective, SQ SLIT tablet, sublingual immunotherapy",
author = "Marco Contoli and Celeste Porsbjerg and Sarah Buchs and Larsen, {Julie Rask} and Nick Freemantle and Benedikt Fritzsching",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaci.2023.02.024",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
pages = "445--452.e4",
journal = "Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology",
issn = "0091-6749",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Real-world, long-term effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis

T2 - Subgroup analyses of the REACT study

AU - Contoli, Marco

AU - Porsbjerg, Celeste

AU - Buchs, Sarah

AU - Larsen, Julie Rask

AU - Freemantle, Nick

AU - Fritzsching, Benedikt

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of allergy immunotherapy (AIT) in allergic rhinitis (AR) and the disease-modifying effects of the SQ grass sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet. Objective: We sought to assess real-world, long-term effectiveness and safety across AIT subgroups: route of administration, therapeutic allergen, persistence to AIT, and SQ grass SLIT tablet. Methods: The primary outcome of AR prescriptions from a retrospective cohort study (REAl-world effeCtiveness in allergy immunoTherapy; 2007-2017) was assessed across prespecified AIT subgroups in subjects with AR with and without AIT prescriptions (controls). Safety was assessed as anaphylaxis for 2 days or less of the first AIT prescription. Subgroup follow-up continued until samples were fewer than 200 subjects. Results: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and SLIT tablets showed similarly greater reductions in AR prescriptions than controls (SCIT vs SLIT tablets: year 3, P = .15; year 5, P = .43). Comparably greater reductions in AR prescriptions were observed for grass- and house dust mite–specific AIT than for controls, but significantly smaller reductions were observed for tree-specific AIT (tree vs house dust mite, and vs grass: years 3 and 5, P < .0001). Persistence to AIT was associated with greater reductions in AR prescriptions versus nonpersistence (persistence vs nonpersistence: year 3, P = .09; year 5, P = .006). SQ grass SLIT tablet showed sustained reductions versus controls for up to 7 years (year 3, P = .002; year 5, P = .03). Rates of anaphylactic shock were low (0.000%-0.092%), with no events for SQ SLIT tablets. Conclusions: These results demonstrate real-world, long-term effectiveness of AIT, complement disease-modifying effects observed in SQ grass SLIT-tablet randomized controlled trials, and highlight the importance of using newer evidence-based AIT products for tree pollen AR.

AB - Background: Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of allergy immunotherapy (AIT) in allergic rhinitis (AR) and the disease-modifying effects of the SQ grass sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet. Objective: We sought to assess real-world, long-term effectiveness and safety across AIT subgroups: route of administration, therapeutic allergen, persistence to AIT, and SQ grass SLIT tablet. Methods: The primary outcome of AR prescriptions from a retrospective cohort study (REAl-world effeCtiveness in allergy immunoTherapy; 2007-2017) was assessed across prespecified AIT subgroups in subjects with AR with and without AIT prescriptions (controls). Safety was assessed as anaphylaxis for 2 days or less of the first AIT prescription. Subgroup follow-up continued until samples were fewer than 200 subjects. Results: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and SLIT tablets showed similarly greater reductions in AR prescriptions than controls (SCIT vs SLIT tablets: year 3, P = .15; year 5, P = .43). Comparably greater reductions in AR prescriptions were observed for grass- and house dust mite–specific AIT than for controls, but significantly smaller reductions were observed for tree-specific AIT (tree vs house dust mite, and vs grass: years 3 and 5, P < .0001). Persistence to AIT was associated with greater reductions in AR prescriptions versus nonpersistence (persistence vs nonpersistence: year 3, P = .09; year 5, P = .006). SQ grass SLIT tablet showed sustained reductions versus controls for up to 7 years (year 3, P = .002; year 5, P = .03). Rates of anaphylactic shock were low (0.000%-0.092%), with no events for SQ SLIT tablets. Conclusions: These results demonstrate real-world, long-term effectiveness of AIT, complement disease-modifying effects observed in SQ grass SLIT-tablet randomized controlled trials, and highlight the importance of using newer evidence-based AIT products for tree pollen AR.

KW - Allergic rhinitis

KW - allergy immunotherapy

KW - cohort study

KW - effectiveness

KW - REACT

KW - real-world evidence

KW - retrospective

KW - SQ SLIT tablet

KW - sublingual immunotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151258161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.02.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.02.024

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36871918

AN - SCOPUS:85151258161

VL - 152

SP - 445-452.e4

JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

SN - 0091-6749

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 370743689