Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures. / Beniczky, Sándor; Conradsen, Isa; Moldovan, Mihai; Jennum, Poul; Fabricius, Martin; Benedek, Krisztina; Andersen, Noémi; Hjalgrim, Helle; Wolf, Peter.

In: Epilepsia, Vol. 55, No. 7, 07.2014, p. 1128-1134.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Beniczky, S, Conradsen, I, Moldovan, M, Jennum, P, Fabricius, M, Benedek, K, Andersen, N, Hjalgrim, H & Wolf, P 2014, 'Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures', Epilepsia, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1128-1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12669

APA

Beniczky, S., Conradsen, I., Moldovan, M., Jennum, P., Fabricius, M., Benedek, K., Andersen, N., Hjalgrim, H., & Wolf, P. (2014). Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures. Epilepsia, 55(7), 1128-1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12669

Vancouver

Beniczky S, Conradsen I, Moldovan M, Jennum P, Fabricius M, Benedek K et al. Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures. Epilepsia. 2014 Jul;55(7):1128-1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12669

Author

Beniczky, Sándor ; Conradsen, Isa ; Moldovan, Mihai ; Jennum, Poul ; Fabricius, Martin ; Benedek, Krisztina ; Andersen, Noémi ; Hjalgrim, Helle ; Wolf, Peter. / Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures. In: Epilepsia. 2014 ; Vol. 55, No. 7. pp. 1128-1134.

Bibtex

@article{3c34100c6667404b8e147e3a89e2fed9,
title = "Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics of sustained muscle activation during convulsive epileptic and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), as compared to voluntary muscle activation. The main goal was to find surface electromyography (EMG) features that can distinguish between convulsive epileptic seizures and convulsive PNES.METHODS: In this case-control study, surface EMG was recorded from the deltoid muscles during long-term video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring in 25 patients and in 21 healthy controls. A total of 46 clinical episodes were recorded: 28 generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) from 14 patients with epilepsy, and 18 convulsive PNES from 12 patients (one patient had both GTCS and PNES). The healthy controls were simulating GTCS. To quantitatively characterize the signals we calculated the following parameters: root mean square (RMS) of the amplitude, median frequency (MF), coherence, and duration of the seizures, of the clonic EMG discharges, and of the silent periods between the cloni. Based on wavelet analysis, we distinguished between a low-frequency component (LF 2-8 Hz) and a high-frequency component (HF 64-256 Hz).RESULTS: Duration of the seizure, and separation between the tonic and the clonic phases distinguished at group-level but not at individual level between convulsive PNES and GTCS. RMS, temporal dynamics of the HF/LF ratio, and the evolution of the silent periods differentiated between epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures at the individual level. A combination between HF/LF ratio and RMS separated all PNES from the GTCS. A blinded review of the EMG features distinguished correctly between GTCS and convulsive PNES in all cases. The HF/LF ratio and the RMS of the PNES were smaller compared to the simulated seizures.SIGNIFICANCE: In addition to providing insight into the mechanism of muscle activation during convulsive PNES, these results have diagnostic significance, at the individual level. Surface EMG features can accurately distinguish convulsive epileptic from nonepileptic psychogenic seizures, even in PNES cases without rhythmic clonic movements.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Body Surface Potential Mapping, Case-Control Studies, Child, Diagnosis, Differential, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Seizures, Single-Blind Method, Young Adult",
author = "S{\'a}ndor Beniczky and Isa Conradsen and Mihai Moldovan and Poul Jennum and Martin Fabricius and Krisztina Benedek and No{\'e}mi Andersen and Helle Hjalgrim and Peter Wolf",
note = "Wiley Periodicals, Inc. {\textcopyright} 2014 International League Against Epilepsy.",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1111/epi.12669",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1128--1134",
journal = "Epilepsia",
issn = "0013-9580",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures

AU - Beniczky, Sándor

AU - Conradsen, Isa

AU - Moldovan, Mihai

AU - Jennum, Poul

AU - Fabricius, Martin

AU - Benedek, Krisztina

AU - Andersen, Noémi

AU - Hjalgrim, Helle

AU - Wolf, Peter

N1 - Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2014 International League Against Epilepsy.

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics of sustained muscle activation during convulsive epileptic and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), as compared to voluntary muscle activation. The main goal was to find surface electromyography (EMG) features that can distinguish between convulsive epileptic seizures and convulsive PNES.METHODS: In this case-control study, surface EMG was recorded from the deltoid muscles during long-term video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring in 25 patients and in 21 healthy controls. A total of 46 clinical episodes were recorded: 28 generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) from 14 patients with epilepsy, and 18 convulsive PNES from 12 patients (one patient had both GTCS and PNES). The healthy controls were simulating GTCS. To quantitatively characterize the signals we calculated the following parameters: root mean square (RMS) of the amplitude, median frequency (MF), coherence, and duration of the seizures, of the clonic EMG discharges, and of the silent periods between the cloni. Based on wavelet analysis, we distinguished between a low-frequency component (LF 2-8 Hz) and a high-frequency component (HF 64-256 Hz).RESULTS: Duration of the seizure, and separation between the tonic and the clonic phases distinguished at group-level but not at individual level between convulsive PNES and GTCS. RMS, temporal dynamics of the HF/LF ratio, and the evolution of the silent periods differentiated between epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures at the individual level. A combination between HF/LF ratio and RMS separated all PNES from the GTCS. A blinded review of the EMG features distinguished correctly between GTCS and convulsive PNES in all cases. The HF/LF ratio and the RMS of the PNES were smaller compared to the simulated seizures.SIGNIFICANCE: In addition to providing insight into the mechanism of muscle activation during convulsive PNES, these results have diagnostic significance, at the individual level. Surface EMG features can accurately distinguish convulsive epileptic from nonepileptic psychogenic seizures, even in PNES cases without rhythmic clonic movements.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics of sustained muscle activation during convulsive epileptic and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), as compared to voluntary muscle activation. The main goal was to find surface electromyography (EMG) features that can distinguish between convulsive epileptic seizures and convulsive PNES.METHODS: In this case-control study, surface EMG was recorded from the deltoid muscles during long-term video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring in 25 patients and in 21 healthy controls. A total of 46 clinical episodes were recorded: 28 generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) from 14 patients with epilepsy, and 18 convulsive PNES from 12 patients (one patient had both GTCS and PNES). The healthy controls were simulating GTCS. To quantitatively characterize the signals we calculated the following parameters: root mean square (RMS) of the amplitude, median frequency (MF), coherence, and duration of the seizures, of the clonic EMG discharges, and of the silent periods between the cloni. Based on wavelet analysis, we distinguished between a low-frequency component (LF 2-8 Hz) and a high-frequency component (HF 64-256 Hz).RESULTS: Duration of the seizure, and separation between the tonic and the clonic phases distinguished at group-level but not at individual level between convulsive PNES and GTCS. RMS, temporal dynamics of the HF/LF ratio, and the evolution of the silent periods differentiated between epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures at the individual level. A combination between HF/LF ratio and RMS separated all PNES from the GTCS. A blinded review of the EMG features distinguished correctly between GTCS and convulsive PNES in all cases. The HF/LF ratio and the RMS of the PNES were smaller compared to the simulated seizures.SIGNIFICANCE: In addition to providing insight into the mechanism of muscle activation during convulsive PNES, these results have diagnostic significance, at the individual level. Surface EMG features can accurately distinguish convulsive epileptic from nonepileptic psychogenic seizures, even in PNES cases without rhythmic clonic movements.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Body Surface Potential Mapping

KW - Case-Control Studies

KW - Child

KW - Diagnosis, Differential

KW - Electroencephalography

KW - Electromyography

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Seizures

KW - Single-Blind Method

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1111/epi.12669

DO - 10.1111/epi.12669

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24889069

VL - 55

SP - 1128

EP - 1134

JO - Epilepsia

JF - Epilepsia

SN - 0013-9580

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 138309758