Introduction: Based on the experience from a Swedish biobank, we established a clinical cervical cytology biobank and adapted it to a Danish setting. The aim of the present study was to validate the biobank material regarding quality and quantity, to determine the usefulness of the material for future diagnostics and biomarker testing. Methods: Cervical cytology samples collected in ThinPrep were analyzed before and after biobanking using p16/ki-67 dual staining, a human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test (Cobas), and a test for HPV messenger RNA (mRNA; Aptima). The concordance of the test results before and after biobanking was assessed. We also evaluated the morphology before and after biobanking and did additional tests on the biobanked material to qualify the usefulness of the material (library preparation for next-generation sequencing [NGS], reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR], and the Inno-Lipa HPV genotyping test). Results: For the Cobas HPV test, the concordance was 92% (122/133), and for the Inno-Lipa test (30 samples), it was 100%. For the Aptima assay, the concordance was a little lower, 84% (42/50). The morphology of the cell was well preserved, and the concordance of the p16/ki-67 dual staining was 88% (37/42). The functional tests showed that DNA-based NGS libraries (TST15 panel; Illumina) had good quality parameters. However, with the RT-PCR, 12% of the samples showed poor quality and a too low input amount for the analysis. Conclusion: The quality of the biobanked samples is high, and the material is suitable for testing of DNA, RNA, and protein. However, for testing of specific biomarkers, pilot studies are recommended to ensure sufficient input amount and quality of the material, especially for RNA-based studies.