Prostate cancer risk stratification improvement across multiple ancestries with new polygenic hazard score

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 2.13 MB, PDF document

  • Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le
  • Roshan Karunamuni
  • Chun Chieh Fan
  • Lui Asona
  • Wesley K. Thompson
  • Maria Elena Martinez
  • Rosalind A. Eeles
  • Zsofia Kote-Jarai
  • Kenneth R. Muir
  • Artitaya Lophatananon
  • Johanna Schleutker
  • Nora Pashayan
  • Jyotsna Batra
  • Henrik Groenberg
  • David E. Neal
  • Nordestgaard, Børge
  • Catherine M. Tangen
  • Robert J. MacInnis
  • Alicja Wolk
  • Demetrius Albanes
  • Christopher A. Haiman
  • Ruth C. Travis
  • William J. Blot
  • Janet L. Stanford
  • Lorelei A. Mucci
  • Catharine M. L. West
  • Sune F. Nielsen
  • Adam S. Kibel
  • Olivier Cussenot
  • Sonja Berndt
  • Stella Koutros
  • Karina Dalsgaard Sorensen
  • Cezary Cybulski
  • Eli Marie Grindedal
  • Florence Menegaux
  • Jong Y. Park
  • Sue A. Ingles
  • Christiane Maier
  • Robert J. Hamilton
  • Barry S. Rosenstein
  • Yong-Jie Lu
  • Stephen Watya
  • Ana Vega
  • Manolis Kogevinas
  • Fredrik Wiklund
  • Kathryn L. Penney
  • Chad D. Huff
  • Manuel R. Teixeira
  • Luc Multigner
  • Robin J. Leach
  • UKGPCS Collaborators
  • APCB Australian Prostate Canc BioR
  • NC-LA PCaP Investigators
  • IMPACT Study Steering Comm Collabo
  • Canary PASS Investigators
  • Profile Study Steering Comm
  • PRACTICAL consortium

Background Prostate cancer risk stratification using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) demonstrates considerable promise in men of European, Asian, and African genetic ancestries, but there is still need for increased accuracy. We evaluated whether including additional SNPs in a prostate cancer polygenic hazard score (PHS) would improve associations with clinically significant prostate cancer in multi-ancestry datasets. Methods In total, 299 SNPs previously associated with prostate cancer were evaluated for inclusion in a new PHS, using a LASSO-regularized Cox proportional hazards model in a training dataset of 72,181 men from the PRACTICAL Consortium. The PHS model was evaluated in four testing datasets: African ancestry, Asian ancestry, and two of European Ancestry-the Cohort of Swedish Men (COSM) and the ProtecT study. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated to compare men with high versus low PHS for association with clinically significant, with any, and with fatal prostate cancer. The impact of genetic risk stratification on the positive predictive value (PPV) of PSA testing for clinically significant prostate cancer was also measured. Results The final model (PHS290) had 290 SNPs with non-zero coefficients. Comparing, for example, the highest and lowest quintiles of PHS290, the hazard ratios (HRs) for clinically significant prostate cancer were 13.73 [95% CI: 12.43-15.16] in ProtecT, 7.07 [6.58-7.60] in African ancestry, 10.31 [9.58-11.11] in Asian ancestry, and 11.18 [10.34-12.09] in COSM. Similar results were seen for association with any and fatal prostate cancer. Without PHS stratification, the PPV of PSA testing for clinically significant prostate cancer in ProtecT was 0.12 (0.11-0.14). For the top 20% and top 5% of PHS290, the PPV of PSA testing was 0.19 (0.15-0.22) and 0.26 (0.19-0.33), respectively. Conclusions We demonstrate better genetic risk stratification for clinically significant prostate cancer than prior versions of PHS in multi-ancestry datasets. This is promising for implementing precision-medicine approaches to prostate cancer screening decisions in diverse populations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Volume25
Pages (from-to)755–761
Number of pages7
ISSN1365-7852
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Research areas

  • SELECTION, LASSO

ID: 317951535