Power Struggles in the Management of Wildlife Resources: The Case of Burunge Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review

Standard

Power Struggles in the Management of Wildlife Resources : The Case of Burunge Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania. / Kicheleri, Rose Peter; Treue, Thorsten; Kajembe, George C. ; Mombo, Felister M. ; Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt.

Wildlife Management: Failures, Successes and Prospects . ed. / Jafari Ramadhani Kideghesho. InTechOpen, 2019. p. 103-123.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Kicheleri, RP, Treue, T, Kajembe, GC, Mombo, FM & Nielsen, MR 2019, Power Struggles in the Management of Wildlife Resources: The Case of Burunge Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania. in JR Kideghesho (ed.), Wildlife Management: Failures, Successes and Prospects . InTechOpen, pp. 103-123. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79521

APA

Kicheleri, R. P., Treue, T., Kajembe, G. C., Mombo, F. M., & Nielsen, M. R. (2019). Power Struggles in the Management of Wildlife Resources: The Case of Burunge Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania. In J. R. Kideghesho (Ed.), Wildlife Management: Failures, Successes and Prospects (pp. 103-123). InTechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79521

Vancouver

Kicheleri RP, Treue T, Kajembe GC, Mombo FM, Nielsen MR. Power Struggles in the Management of Wildlife Resources: The Case of Burunge Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania. In Kideghesho JR, editor, Wildlife Management: Failures, Successes and Prospects . InTechOpen. 2019. p. 103-123 https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79521

Author

Kicheleri, Rose Peter ; Treue, Thorsten ; Kajembe, George C. ; Mombo, Felister M. ; Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt. / Power Struggles in the Management of Wildlife Resources : The Case of Burunge Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania. Wildlife Management: Failures, Successes and Prospects . editor / Jafari Ramadhani Kideghesho. InTechOpen, 2019. pp. 103-123

Bibtex

@inbook{6bdd3c2fa4f84e139bc5ccdcd7d93beb,
title = "Power Struggles in the Management of Wildlife Resources: The Case of Burunge Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania",
abstract = "Through a cross-sectional research design, this study examined power struggles in Burunge Wildlife Management Area (WMA) in Tanzania. Four out of ten villages comprising the WMA were purposively selected, and data were collected via focus group discussions, key informant interviews, questionnaires to household heads, and a literature review. Results showed that the central government, investors and non-government organisations held institutional and strategic powers, while the democratically elected Village Councils held structural powers and lost most of their pre-WMA institutional powers to a legally required new institution, the Authorised Association. Therefore, Village Councils lost influence on strategic, institutional and management decisions pertinent to the WMA and their constituencies{\textquoteright} livelihoods. Accordingly, Burunge WMA de-democratised wildlife management by eroding the relevance of Village Councils to their constituencies. The study also found power struggles over revenues, land management and access to resources among the stakeholders, mainly due to a divergence of interests. However, there was no conflict management mechanism in place. Hence, we recommend that the institutional powers to establish, govern and dissolve WMAs should go back to Village Councils. The purpose is to establish economic incentive structures that promote (i) wildlife conservation, (ii) an equitable distribution of associated costs and benefits between Village Councils forming WMAs and (iii) an equitable distribution of costs and benefits between WMAs and higher levels of government as well as international conservation NGOs.",
author = "Kicheleri, {Rose Peter} and Thorsten Treue and Kajembe, {George C.} and Mombo, {Felister M.} and Nielsen, {Martin Reinhardt}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.5772/intechopen.79521",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-78985-291-2",
pages = "103--123",
editor = "Kideghesho, {Jafari Ramadhani }",
booktitle = "Wildlife Management",
publisher = "InTechOpen",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Power Struggles in the Management of Wildlife Resources

T2 - The Case of Burunge Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania

AU - Kicheleri, Rose Peter

AU - Treue, Thorsten

AU - Kajembe, George C.

AU - Mombo, Felister M.

AU - Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Through a cross-sectional research design, this study examined power struggles in Burunge Wildlife Management Area (WMA) in Tanzania. Four out of ten villages comprising the WMA were purposively selected, and data were collected via focus group discussions, key informant interviews, questionnaires to household heads, and a literature review. Results showed that the central government, investors and non-government organisations held institutional and strategic powers, while the democratically elected Village Councils held structural powers and lost most of their pre-WMA institutional powers to a legally required new institution, the Authorised Association. Therefore, Village Councils lost influence on strategic, institutional and management decisions pertinent to the WMA and their constituencies’ livelihoods. Accordingly, Burunge WMA de-democratised wildlife management by eroding the relevance of Village Councils to their constituencies. The study also found power struggles over revenues, land management and access to resources among the stakeholders, mainly due to a divergence of interests. However, there was no conflict management mechanism in place. Hence, we recommend that the institutional powers to establish, govern and dissolve WMAs should go back to Village Councils. The purpose is to establish economic incentive structures that promote (i) wildlife conservation, (ii) an equitable distribution of associated costs and benefits between Village Councils forming WMAs and (iii) an equitable distribution of costs and benefits between WMAs and higher levels of government as well as international conservation NGOs.

AB - Through a cross-sectional research design, this study examined power struggles in Burunge Wildlife Management Area (WMA) in Tanzania. Four out of ten villages comprising the WMA were purposively selected, and data were collected via focus group discussions, key informant interviews, questionnaires to household heads, and a literature review. Results showed that the central government, investors and non-government organisations held institutional and strategic powers, while the democratically elected Village Councils held structural powers and lost most of their pre-WMA institutional powers to a legally required new institution, the Authorised Association. Therefore, Village Councils lost influence on strategic, institutional and management decisions pertinent to the WMA and their constituencies’ livelihoods. Accordingly, Burunge WMA de-democratised wildlife management by eroding the relevance of Village Councils to their constituencies. The study also found power struggles over revenues, land management and access to resources among the stakeholders, mainly due to a divergence of interests. However, there was no conflict management mechanism in place. Hence, we recommend that the institutional powers to establish, govern and dissolve WMAs should go back to Village Councils. The purpose is to establish economic incentive structures that promote (i) wildlife conservation, (ii) an equitable distribution of associated costs and benefits between Village Councils forming WMAs and (iii) an equitable distribution of costs and benefits between WMAs and higher levels of government as well as international conservation NGOs.

U2 - 10.5772/intechopen.79521

DO - 10.5772/intechopen.79521

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-1-78985-291-2

SP - 103

EP - 123

BT - Wildlife Management

A2 - Kideghesho, Jafari Ramadhani

PB - InTechOpen

ER -

ID: 213043370