Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Zuzana Kos
  • Elvire Roblin
  • Rim S Kim
  • Stefan Michiels
  • Brandon D Gallas
  • Weijie Chen
  • Koen K van de Vijver
  • Shom Goel
  • Sylvia Adams
  • Sandra Demaria
  • Giuseppe Viale
  • Torsten O Nielsen
  • Sunil S Badve
  • W Fraser Symmans
  • Christos Sotiriou
  • David L Rimm
  • Stephen Hewitt
  • Carsten Denkert
  • Sibylle Loibl
  • Stephen J Luen
  • John M S Bartlett
  • Peter Savas
  • Giancarlo Pruneri
  • Deborah A Dillon
  • Maggie Chon U Cheang
  • Andrew Tutt
  • Jacqueline A Hall
  • Marleen Kok
  • Hugo M Horlings
  • Anant Madabhushi
  • Jeroen van der Laak
  • Francesco Ciompi
  • Lænkholm, Anne-Vibeke
  • Enrique Bellolio
  • Tina Gruosso
  • Stephen B Fox
  • Juan Carlos Araya
  • Giuseppe Floris
  • Jan Hudeček
  • Leonie Voorwerk
  • Andrew H Beck
  • Jen Kerner
  • Denis Larsimont
  • Sabine Declercq
  • Gert Van den Eynden
  • Lajos Pusztai
  • Anna Ehinger
  • Rajendra Singh
  • Eva Balslev
  • Stovgaard, Elisabeth Ida Specht
  • International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group

Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are important prognostic and predictive biomarkers in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer. Incorporating sTILs into clinical practice necessitates reproducible assessment. Previously developed standardized scoring guidelines have been widely embraced by the clinical and research communities. We evaluated sources of variability in sTIL assessment by pathologists in three previous sTIL ring studies. We identify common challenges and evaluate impact of discrepancies on outcome estimates in early TNBC using a newly-developed prognostic tool. Discordant sTIL assessment is driven by heterogeneity in lymphocyte distribution. Additional factors include: technical slide-related issues; scoring outside the tumor boundary; tumors with minimal assessable stroma; including lymphocytes associated with other structures; and including other inflammatory cells. Small variations in sTIL assessment modestly alter risk estimation in early TNBC but have the potential to affect treatment selection if cutpoints are employed. Scoring and averaging multiple areas, as well as use of reference images, improve consistency of sTIL evaluation. Moreover, to assist in avoiding the pitfalls identified in this analysis, we developed an educational resource available at www.tilsinbreastcancer.org/pitfalls.

Original languageEnglish
Journalnpj Breast Cancer
Volume6
Pages (from-to)17
ISSN2374-4677
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 259929731