Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia in Subacute Stroke : A Randomized Controlled Trial. / Bath, Philip M W; Scutt, Polly; Love, Jo; Clavé, Pere; Cohen, David; Dziewas, Rainer; Iversen, Helle K; Ledl, Christian; Ragab, Suzanne; Soda, Hassan; Warusevitane, Anushka; Woisard, Virginie; Hamdy, Shaheen; Swallowing Treatment Using Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (STEPS) Trial Investigators.

In: Stroke, Vol. 47, No. 6, 06.2016, p. 1562-1570 + tillæg.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bath, PMW, Scutt, P, Love, J, Clavé, P, Cohen, D, Dziewas, R, Iversen, HK, Ledl, C, Ragab, S, Soda, H, Warusevitane, A, Woisard, V, Hamdy, S & Swallowing Treatment Using Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (STEPS) Trial Investigators 2016, 'Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial', Stroke, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1562-1570 + tillæg. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012455

APA

Bath, P. M. W., Scutt, P., Love, J., Clavé, P., Cohen, D., Dziewas, R., Iversen, H. K., Ledl, C., Ragab, S., Soda, H., Warusevitane, A., Woisard, V., Hamdy, S., & Swallowing Treatment Using Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (STEPS) Trial Investigators (2016). Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke, 47(6), 1562-1570 + tillæg. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012455

Vancouver

Bath PMW, Scutt P, Love J, Clavé P, Cohen D, Dziewas R et al. Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):1562-1570 + tillæg. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012455

Author

Bath, Philip M W ; Scutt, Polly ; Love, Jo ; Clavé, Pere ; Cohen, David ; Dziewas, Rainer ; Iversen, Helle K ; Ledl, Christian ; Ragab, Suzanne ; Soda, Hassan ; Warusevitane, Anushka ; Woisard, Virginie ; Hamdy, Shaheen ; Swallowing Treatment Using Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (STEPS) Trial Investigators. / Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia in Subacute Stroke : A Randomized Controlled Trial. In: Stroke. 2016 ; Vol. 47, No. 6. pp. 1562-1570 + tillæg.

Bibtex

@article{490599dd0c2c422a80ce1eba1bb955a5,
title = "Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dysphagia is common after stroke, associated with increased death and dependency, and treatment options are limited. Pharyngeal electric stimulation (PES) is a novel treatment for poststroke dysphagia that has shown promise in 3 pilot randomized controlled trials.METHODS: We randomly assigned 162 patients with a recent ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and dysphagia, defined as a penetration aspiration score (PAS) of ≥3 on video fluoroscopy, to PES or sham treatment given on 3 consecutive days. The primary outcome was swallowing safety, assessed using the PAS, at 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes included dysphagia severity, function, quality of life, and serious adverse events at 6 and 12 weeks.RESULTS: In randomized patients, the mean age was 74 years, male 58%, ischemic stroke 89%, and PAS 4.8. The mean treatment current was 14.8 (7.9) mA and duration 9.9 (1.2) minutes per session. On the basis of previous data, 45 patients (58.4%) randomized to PES seemed to receive suboptimal stimulation. The PAS at 2 weeks, adjusted for baseline, did not differ between the randomized groups: PES 3.7 (2.0) versus sham 3.6 (1.9), P=0.60. Similarly, the secondary outcomes did not differ, including clinical swallowing and functional outcome. No serious adverse device-related events occurred.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with subacute stroke and dysphagia, PES was safe but did not improve dysphagia. Undertreatment of patients receiving PES may have contributed to the neutral result.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25681641.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain Ischemia, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Deglutition Disorders, Double-Blind Method, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Pharynx, Photofluorography, Stroke, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial",
author = "Bath, {Philip M W} and Polly Scutt and Jo Love and Pere Clav{\'e} and David Cohen and Rainer Dziewas and Iversen, {Helle K} and Christian Ledl and Suzanne Ragab and Hassan Soda and Anushka Warusevitane and Virginie Woisard and Shaheen Hamdy and {Swallowing Treatment Using Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (STEPS) Trial Investigators}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2016 The Authors.",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012455",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1562--1570 + till{\ae}g",
journal = "Stroke",
issn = "0039-2499",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia in Subacute Stroke

T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Bath, Philip M W

AU - Scutt, Polly

AU - Love, Jo

AU - Clavé, Pere

AU - Cohen, David

AU - Dziewas, Rainer

AU - Iversen, Helle K

AU - Ledl, Christian

AU - Ragab, Suzanne

AU - Soda, Hassan

AU - Warusevitane, Anushka

AU - Woisard, Virginie

AU - Hamdy, Shaheen

AU - Swallowing Treatment Using Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (STEPS) Trial Investigators

N1 - © 2016 The Authors.

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dysphagia is common after stroke, associated with increased death and dependency, and treatment options are limited. Pharyngeal electric stimulation (PES) is a novel treatment for poststroke dysphagia that has shown promise in 3 pilot randomized controlled trials.METHODS: We randomly assigned 162 patients with a recent ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and dysphagia, defined as a penetration aspiration score (PAS) of ≥3 on video fluoroscopy, to PES or sham treatment given on 3 consecutive days. The primary outcome was swallowing safety, assessed using the PAS, at 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes included dysphagia severity, function, quality of life, and serious adverse events at 6 and 12 weeks.RESULTS: In randomized patients, the mean age was 74 years, male 58%, ischemic stroke 89%, and PAS 4.8. The mean treatment current was 14.8 (7.9) mA and duration 9.9 (1.2) minutes per session. On the basis of previous data, 45 patients (58.4%) randomized to PES seemed to receive suboptimal stimulation. The PAS at 2 weeks, adjusted for baseline, did not differ between the randomized groups: PES 3.7 (2.0) versus sham 3.6 (1.9), P=0.60. Similarly, the secondary outcomes did not differ, including clinical swallowing and functional outcome. No serious adverse device-related events occurred.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with subacute stroke and dysphagia, PES was safe but did not improve dysphagia. Undertreatment of patients receiving PES may have contributed to the neutral result.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25681641.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dysphagia is common after stroke, associated with increased death and dependency, and treatment options are limited. Pharyngeal electric stimulation (PES) is a novel treatment for poststroke dysphagia that has shown promise in 3 pilot randomized controlled trials.METHODS: We randomly assigned 162 patients with a recent ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and dysphagia, defined as a penetration aspiration score (PAS) of ≥3 on video fluoroscopy, to PES or sham treatment given on 3 consecutive days. The primary outcome was swallowing safety, assessed using the PAS, at 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes included dysphagia severity, function, quality of life, and serious adverse events at 6 and 12 weeks.RESULTS: In randomized patients, the mean age was 74 years, male 58%, ischemic stroke 89%, and PAS 4.8. The mean treatment current was 14.8 (7.9) mA and duration 9.9 (1.2) minutes per session. On the basis of previous data, 45 patients (58.4%) randomized to PES seemed to receive suboptimal stimulation. The PAS at 2 weeks, adjusted for baseline, did not differ between the randomized groups: PES 3.7 (2.0) versus sham 3.6 (1.9), P=0.60. Similarly, the secondary outcomes did not differ, including clinical swallowing and functional outcome. No serious adverse device-related events occurred.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with subacute stroke and dysphagia, PES was safe but did not improve dysphagia. Undertreatment of patients receiving PES may have contributed to the neutral result.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25681641.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Brain Ischemia

KW - Cerebral Hemorrhage

KW - Deglutition Disorders

KW - Double-Blind Method

KW - Electric Stimulation Therapy

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Pharynx

KW - Photofluorography

KW - Stroke

KW - Journal Article

KW - Multicenter Study

KW - Randomized Controlled Trial

U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012455

DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012455

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27165955

VL - 47

SP - 1562-1570 + tillæg

JO - Stroke

JF - Stroke

SN - 0039-2499

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 179084684