Optimizing COPD treatment in patients with lung- or head and neck cancer does not improve quality of life – a randomized, pilot, clinical trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Optimizing COPD treatment in patients with lung- or head and neck cancer does not improve quality of life – a randomized, pilot, clinical trial. / Gottlieb, Magnus; Mellemgaard, Anders; Marsaa, Kristoffer; Godtfredsen, Nina.

In: European Clinical Respiratory Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1731277, 03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Gottlieb, M, Mellemgaard, A, Marsaa, K & Godtfredsen, N 2020, 'Optimizing COPD treatment in patients with lung- or head and neck cancer does not improve quality of life – a randomized, pilot, clinical trial', European Clinical Respiratory Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, 1731277. https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2020.1731277

APA

Gottlieb, M., Mellemgaard, A., Marsaa, K., & Godtfredsen, N. (2020). Optimizing COPD treatment in patients with lung- or head and neck cancer does not improve quality of life – a randomized, pilot, clinical trial. European Clinical Respiratory Journal, 7(1), [1731277]. https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2020.1731277

Vancouver

Gottlieb M, Mellemgaard A, Marsaa K, Godtfredsen N. Optimizing COPD treatment in patients with lung- or head and neck cancer does not improve quality of life – a randomized, pilot, clinical trial. European Clinical Respiratory Journal. 2020 Mar;7(1). 1731277. https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2020.1731277

Author

Gottlieb, Magnus ; Mellemgaard, Anders ; Marsaa, Kristoffer ; Godtfredsen, Nina. / Optimizing COPD treatment in patients with lung- or head and neck cancer does not improve quality of life – a randomized, pilot, clinical trial. In: European Clinical Respiratory Journal. 2020 ; Vol. 7, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{0869baf78fee454ab6aff1f57433c039,
title = "Optimizing COPD treatment in patients with lung- or head and neck cancer does not improve quality of life – a randomized, pilot, clinical trial",
abstract = "Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common comorbidity in patients with lung and head- and neck cancer. Patients with lung cancer who also suffer from COPD have a worse prognosis than patients with lung cancer and no COPD. It has previously been shown that diagnosis and treatment of concomitant COPD in patients with newly diagnosed lung- or head and neck cancer need optimization. In this randomized, controlled trial we aimed to assess if intervention directed at improving treatment for COPD in these patients improved health-related quality of life (QoL). Methods: During 2014, we randomized 114 patients referred for oncological treatment at a large university hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark, to either usual care or intervention regarding concomitant COPD. The intervention consisted of two visits in an out-patient clinic established at the oncological department and staffed with a pulmonary physician. At baseline, week 13 and week 25, all patients filled out the cancer- and COPD-specific QoL questionnaires CAT and EORTC, respectively. The primary outcome was change in CAT-score between control- and intervention group. The secondary outcome was change in EORTC. Results: There was no change in CAT-score by week 13 or 25 between the groups. For the EORTC there was a statistically significant improvement only in the fatigue domain at week 13 (p = 0.03), but not at week 25. There was a trend towards less dyspnea in the intervention group at week 13, measured by EORTC (p = 0.07). Mortality by week 25 was similar in both groups. Conclusion: In this population of severely ill cancer patients, we did not find that this intervention, focusing on inhaled COPD medication, for the management of COPD had any convincing positive impact on the patients{\textquoteright} perceived quality of life compared with usual care. Further studies are needed.",
keywords = "comorbidity, COPD, lung cancer",
author = "Magnus Gottlieb and Anders Mellemgaard and Kristoffer Marsaa and Nina Godtfredsen",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1080/20018525.2020.1731277",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "European Clinical Respiratory Journal",
issn = "2001-8525",
publisher = "Co-Action Publishing",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing COPD treatment in patients with lung- or head and neck cancer does not improve quality of life – a randomized, pilot, clinical trial

AU - Gottlieb, Magnus

AU - Mellemgaard, Anders

AU - Marsaa, Kristoffer

AU - Godtfredsen, Nina

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common comorbidity in patients with lung and head- and neck cancer. Patients with lung cancer who also suffer from COPD have a worse prognosis than patients with lung cancer and no COPD. It has previously been shown that diagnosis and treatment of concomitant COPD in patients with newly diagnosed lung- or head and neck cancer need optimization. In this randomized, controlled trial we aimed to assess if intervention directed at improving treatment for COPD in these patients improved health-related quality of life (QoL). Methods: During 2014, we randomized 114 patients referred for oncological treatment at a large university hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark, to either usual care or intervention regarding concomitant COPD. The intervention consisted of two visits in an out-patient clinic established at the oncological department and staffed with a pulmonary physician. At baseline, week 13 and week 25, all patients filled out the cancer- and COPD-specific QoL questionnaires CAT and EORTC, respectively. The primary outcome was change in CAT-score between control- and intervention group. The secondary outcome was change in EORTC. Results: There was no change in CAT-score by week 13 or 25 between the groups. For the EORTC there was a statistically significant improvement only in the fatigue domain at week 13 (p = 0.03), but not at week 25. There was a trend towards less dyspnea in the intervention group at week 13, measured by EORTC (p = 0.07). Mortality by week 25 was similar in both groups. Conclusion: In this population of severely ill cancer patients, we did not find that this intervention, focusing on inhaled COPD medication, for the management of COPD had any convincing positive impact on the patients’ perceived quality of life compared with usual care. Further studies are needed.

AB - Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common comorbidity in patients with lung and head- and neck cancer. Patients with lung cancer who also suffer from COPD have a worse prognosis than patients with lung cancer and no COPD. It has previously been shown that diagnosis and treatment of concomitant COPD in patients with newly diagnosed lung- or head and neck cancer need optimization. In this randomized, controlled trial we aimed to assess if intervention directed at improving treatment for COPD in these patients improved health-related quality of life (QoL). Methods: During 2014, we randomized 114 patients referred for oncological treatment at a large university hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark, to either usual care or intervention regarding concomitant COPD. The intervention consisted of two visits in an out-patient clinic established at the oncological department and staffed with a pulmonary physician. At baseline, week 13 and week 25, all patients filled out the cancer- and COPD-specific QoL questionnaires CAT and EORTC, respectively. The primary outcome was change in CAT-score between control- and intervention group. The secondary outcome was change in EORTC. Results: There was no change in CAT-score by week 13 or 25 between the groups. For the EORTC there was a statistically significant improvement only in the fatigue domain at week 13 (p = 0.03), but not at week 25. There was a trend towards less dyspnea in the intervention group at week 13, measured by EORTC (p = 0.07). Mortality by week 25 was similar in both groups. Conclusion: In this population of severely ill cancer patients, we did not find that this intervention, focusing on inhaled COPD medication, for the management of COPD had any convincing positive impact on the patients’ perceived quality of life compared with usual care. Further studies are needed.

KW - comorbidity

KW - COPD

KW - lung cancer

U2 - 10.1080/20018525.2020.1731277

DO - 10.1080/20018525.2020.1731277

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32194927

AN - SCOPUS:85082729464

VL - 7

JO - European Clinical Respiratory Journal

JF - European Clinical Respiratory Journal

SN - 2001-8525

IS - 1

M1 - 1731277

ER -

ID: 244276429