Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis versus contrast-induced nephropathy: risks and benefits of contrast-enhanced MR and CT in renally impaired patients

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Diego R Martin
  • Richard C Semelka
  • Arlene Chapman
  • Harm Peters
  • Paul J Finn
  • Bobby Kalb
  • Thomsen, Henrik S.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) have become essential to diagnostic evaluation of many, or most, important medically and surgically treated diseases. It is important to consider comprehensively the implications in making decisions when choosing one or the other cross-sectional imaging modality. Factors to consider include the relative risks of the contrast agent. Other factors include the relative procedural risks, including radiation risks and the relative expected diagnostic yield of the examination technique (12). In this review we describe both nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and contrast-induced nephropathy to compare the implications with regard to relative risks and benefits of contrast-enhanced MRI or CT in patients with impaired renal function. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;30:1350-1356. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume30
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1350-6
Number of pages7
ISSN1053-1807
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Bibliographical note

Keywords: Comorbidity; Contrast Media; Humans; Iodine Compounds; Kidney Failure; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

ID: 20621378