Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis versus contrast-induced nephropathy: risks and benefits of contrast-enhanced MR and CT in renally impaired patients
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis versus contrast-induced nephropathy: risks and benefits of contrast-enhanced MR and CT in renally impaired patients. / Martin, Diego R; Semelka, Richard C; Chapman, Arlene; Peters, Harm; Finn, Paul J; Kalb, Bobby; Thomsen, Henrik.
In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2009, p. 1350-6.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis versus contrast-induced nephropathy: risks and benefits of contrast-enhanced MR and CT in renally impaired patients
AU - Martin, Diego R
AU - Semelka, Richard C
AU - Chapman, Arlene
AU - Peters, Harm
AU - Finn, Paul J
AU - Kalb, Bobby
AU - Thomsen, Henrik
N1 - Keywords: Comorbidity; Contrast Media; Humans; Iodine Compounds; Kidney Failure; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) have become essential to diagnostic evaluation of many, or most, important medically and surgically treated diseases. It is important to consider comprehensively the implications in making decisions when choosing one or the other cross-sectional imaging modality. Factors to consider include the relative risks of the contrast agent. Other factors include the relative procedural risks, including radiation risks and the relative expected diagnostic yield of the examination technique (12). In this review we describe both nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and contrast-induced nephropathy to compare the implications with regard to relative risks and benefits of contrast-enhanced MRI or CT in patients with impaired renal function. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;30:1350-1356. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
AB - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) have become essential to diagnostic evaluation of many, or most, important medically and surgically treated diseases. It is important to consider comprehensively the implications in making decisions when choosing one or the other cross-sectional imaging modality. Factors to consider include the relative risks of the contrast agent. Other factors include the relative procedural risks, including radiation risks and the relative expected diagnostic yield of the examination technique (12). In this review we describe both nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and contrast-induced nephropathy to compare the implications with regard to relative risks and benefits of contrast-enhanced MRI or CT in patients with impaired renal function. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;30:1350-1356. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.21968
DO - 10.1002/jmri.21968
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 19937934
VL - 30
SP - 1350
EP - 1356
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
SN - 1053-1807
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 20621378