My v Ja alebo Ja v My? Kolektívna intencionalita a jastvo

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

My v Ja alebo Ja v My? Kolektívna intencionalita a jastvo. / Zahavi, Dan.

In: Filozofia, Vol. 78, No. 10, 2023, p. 801-820.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Zahavi, D 2023, 'My v Ja alebo Ja v My? Kolektívna intencionalita a jastvo', Filozofia, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 801-820. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.1

APA

Zahavi, D. (2023). My v Ja alebo Ja v My? Kolektívna intencionalita a jastvo. Filozofia, 78(10), 801-820. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.1

Vancouver

Zahavi D. My v Ja alebo Ja v My? Kolektívna intencionalita a jastvo. Filozofia. 2023;78(10):801-820. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.1

Author

Zahavi, Dan. / My v Ja alebo Ja v My? Kolektívna intencionalita a jastvo. In: Filozofia. 2023 ; Vol. 78, No. 10. pp. 801-820.

Bibtex

@article{c794d48e1af14063b9f7539c6f0dd660,
title = "My v Ja alebo Ja v My?: Kolekt{\'i}vna intencionalita a jastvo",
abstract = "The article takes issue with the proposal that dominant accounts of collectiveintentionality suffer from an individualist bias and that one should insteadreverse the order of explanation and give primacy to the we and the community.It discusses different versions of the community first view and argues that theyfail because they operate with too simplistic a conception of what it means to bea self and misunderstand what it means to be (part of) a we. In presenting thisargument, the article seeks to demonstrate that a thorough investigation ofcollective intentionality has to address the status and nature of the we, and thatdoing so will require an analysis of the relation between the we and the I, whichin turn will call for a more explicit engagement with the question of selfhoodthan is customary in contemporary discussions of collective intentionality.",
author = "Dan Zahavi",
note = "Slovakisk overs{\ae}ttelse af “We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood,” Journal of Social Ontology, 7 (1), 2021, 1 – 20.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.1",
language = "Flere sprog",
volume = "78",
pages = "801--820",
journal = "Filozofia",
issn = "0046-385X",
publisher = "Slovak Academic Press Ltd.",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - My v Ja alebo Ja v My?

T2 - Kolektívna intencionalita a jastvo

AU - Zahavi, Dan

N1 - Slovakisk oversættelse af “We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood,” Journal of Social Ontology, 7 (1), 2021, 1 – 20.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The article takes issue with the proposal that dominant accounts of collectiveintentionality suffer from an individualist bias and that one should insteadreverse the order of explanation and give primacy to the we and the community.It discusses different versions of the community first view and argues that theyfail because they operate with too simplistic a conception of what it means to bea self and misunderstand what it means to be (part of) a we. In presenting thisargument, the article seeks to demonstrate that a thorough investigation ofcollective intentionality has to address the status and nature of the we, and thatdoing so will require an analysis of the relation between the we and the I, whichin turn will call for a more explicit engagement with the question of selfhoodthan is customary in contemporary discussions of collective intentionality.

AB - The article takes issue with the proposal that dominant accounts of collectiveintentionality suffer from an individualist bias and that one should insteadreverse the order of explanation and give primacy to the we and the community.It discusses different versions of the community first view and argues that theyfail because they operate with too simplistic a conception of what it means to bea self and misunderstand what it means to be (part of) a we. In presenting thisargument, the article seeks to demonstrate that a thorough investigation ofcollective intentionality has to address the status and nature of the we, and thatdoing so will require an analysis of the relation between the we and the I, whichin turn will call for a more explicit engagement with the question of selfhoodthan is customary in contemporary discussions of collective intentionality.

U2 - 10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.1

DO - 10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.1

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 78

SP - 801

EP - 820

JO - Filozofia

JF - Filozofia

SN - 0046-385X

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 375715974