Multi-stakeholder perspectives on field crop robots: lessons from four case areas in Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Multi-stakeholder perspectives on field crop robots : lessons from four case areas in Europe. / Tamirat, Tseganesh Wubale; Pedersen, Søren Marcus; Ørum, Jens Erik; Holm, Sune Hannibal.

In: Smart Agricultural Technology, Vol. 4, 100143, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tamirat, TW, Pedersen, SM, Ørum, JE & Holm, SH 2023, 'Multi-stakeholder perspectives on field crop robots: lessons from four case areas in Europe', Smart Agricultural Technology, vol. 4, 100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100143

APA

Tamirat, T. W., Pedersen, S. M., Ørum, J. E., & Holm, S. H. (2023). Multi-stakeholder perspectives on field crop robots: lessons from four case areas in Europe. Smart Agricultural Technology, 4, [100143]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100143

Vancouver

Tamirat TW, Pedersen SM, Ørum JE, Holm SH. Multi-stakeholder perspectives on field crop robots: lessons from four case areas in Europe. Smart Agricultural Technology. 2023;4. 100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100143

Author

Tamirat, Tseganesh Wubale ; Pedersen, Søren Marcus ; Ørum, Jens Erik ; Holm, Sune Hannibal. / Multi-stakeholder perspectives on field crop robots : lessons from four case areas in Europe. In: Smart Agricultural Technology. 2023 ; Vol. 4.

Bibtex

@article{1bbb59bb6c8946589118f3b200a12b61,
title = "Multi-stakeholder perspectives on field crop robots: lessons from four case areas in Europe",
abstract = "Agriculture has now opened its door to robotic and automated applications including in primary production. This study presents perspectives of several stakeholder groups regarding use of robots in field crop operations, with a focus on expectations and concerns. Data was collected through farmer surveys from four case areas in Europe and interviews with non-farmer stakeholders (robot companies, researchers, project site managers, public authorities and environmental conservation societies). Farmers expect farming robots to provide several benefits primarily reduction in labor cost and environmental impact accompanied by profit increase. Their major concerns relate to investment cost, safety, reliability and adaptability to small farm sizes. Non-farmer stakeholders emphasize on opportunities related to sustainability and green transition of farming, co-design of solutions based on available tools, and new business opportunities. Concerns about risk of moving the farmer away from what is traditionally farming, job polarization, data ownership, cyber security, and legislation appear to be pronounced by the non-farmer stakeholders relative to farmer respondents. These call for co-design of solutions considering the priority needs, challenges, concerns, ideas, and expertise of the different stakeholders. Mutually rewarding and sustainable solutions for robotic applications in agriculture can only be imagined with predictable and reliable developments in institutional infrastructure governing safety, data ownership and security, accountability, competition, and sharing of costs and benefits.",
keywords = "concern, European agriculture, expectation, field crop robot, labor shortage, sustainability",
author = "Tamirat, {Tseganesh Wubale} and Pedersen, {S{\o}ren Marcus} and {\O}rum, {Jens Erik} and Holm, {Sune Hannibal}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.atech.2022.100143",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Smart Agricultural Technology",
issn = "2772-3755",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-stakeholder perspectives on field crop robots

T2 - lessons from four case areas in Europe

AU - Tamirat, Tseganesh Wubale

AU - Pedersen, Søren Marcus

AU - Ørum, Jens Erik

AU - Holm, Sune Hannibal

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Agriculture has now opened its door to robotic and automated applications including in primary production. This study presents perspectives of several stakeholder groups regarding use of robots in field crop operations, with a focus on expectations and concerns. Data was collected through farmer surveys from four case areas in Europe and interviews with non-farmer stakeholders (robot companies, researchers, project site managers, public authorities and environmental conservation societies). Farmers expect farming robots to provide several benefits primarily reduction in labor cost and environmental impact accompanied by profit increase. Their major concerns relate to investment cost, safety, reliability and adaptability to small farm sizes. Non-farmer stakeholders emphasize on opportunities related to sustainability and green transition of farming, co-design of solutions based on available tools, and new business opportunities. Concerns about risk of moving the farmer away from what is traditionally farming, job polarization, data ownership, cyber security, and legislation appear to be pronounced by the non-farmer stakeholders relative to farmer respondents. These call for co-design of solutions considering the priority needs, challenges, concerns, ideas, and expertise of the different stakeholders. Mutually rewarding and sustainable solutions for robotic applications in agriculture can only be imagined with predictable and reliable developments in institutional infrastructure governing safety, data ownership and security, accountability, competition, and sharing of costs and benefits.

AB - Agriculture has now opened its door to robotic and automated applications including in primary production. This study presents perspectives of several stakeholder groups regarding use of robots in field crop operations, with a focus on expectations and concerns. Data was collected through farmer surveys from four case areas in Europe and interviews with non-farmer stakeholders (robot companies, researchers, project site managers, public authorities and environmental conservation societies). Farmers expect farming robots to provide several benefits primarily reduction in labor cost and environmental impact accompanied by profit increase. Their major concerns relate to investment cost, safety, reliability and adaptability to small farm sizes. Non-farmer stakeholders emphasize on opportunities related to sustainability and green transition of farming, co-design of solutions based on available tools, and new business opportunities. Concerns about risk of moving the farmer away from what is traditionally farming, job polarization, data ownership, cyber security, and legislation appear to be pronounced by the non-farmer stakeholders relative to farmer respondents. These call for co-design of solutions considering the priority needs, challenges, concerns, ideas, and expertise of the different stakeholders. Mutually rewarding and sustainable solutions for robotic applications in agriculture can only be imagined with predictable and reliable developments in institutional infrastructure governing safety, data ownership and security, accountability, competition, and sharing of costs and benefits.

KW - concern

KW - European agriculture

KW - expectation

KW - field crop robot

KW - labor shortage

KW - sustainability

U2 - 10.1016/j.atech.2022.100143

DO - 10.1016/j.atech.2022.100143

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85143858273

VL - 4

JO - Smart Agricultural Technology

JF - Smart Agricultural Technology

SN - 2772-3755

M1 - 100143

ER -

ID: 332995747