Metals in used and unused metalworking fluids: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry as a screening test

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Metals in used and unused metalworking fluids : X-ray fluorescence spectrometry as a screening test. / Alinaghi, Farzad; Hedberg, Yolanda S.; Zachariae, Claus; Thyssen, Jacob P.; Johansen, Jeanne D.

In: Contact Dermatitis, Vol. 83, No. 2, 2020, p. 83-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Alinaghi, F, Hedberg, YS, Zachariae, C, Thyssen, JP & Johansen, JD 2020, 'Metals in used and unused metalworking fluids: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry as a screening test', Contact Dermatitis, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13533

APA

Alinaghi, F., Hedberg, Y. S., Zachariae, C., Thyssen, J. P., & Johansen, J. D. (2020). Metals in used and unused metalworking fluids: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry as a screening test. Contact Dermatitis, 83(2), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13533

Vancouver

Alinaghi F, Hedberg YS, Zachariae C, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD. Metals in used and unused metalworking fluids: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry as a screening test. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;83(2):83-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13533

Author

Alinaghi, Farzad ; Hedberg, Yolanda S. ; Zachariae, Claus ; Thyssen, Jacob P. ; Johansen, Jeanne D. / Metals in used and unused metalworking fluids : X-ray fluorescence spectrometry as a screening test. In: Contact Dermatitis. 2020 ; Vol. 83, No. 2. pp. 83-87.

Bibtex

@article{5f12c27f52f14e41b82cfaa72985bc2e,
title = "Metals in used and unused metalworking fluids: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry as a screening test",
abstract = "Background: Exposure to metalworking fluids (MWFs) is a well-known cause of occupational contact dermatitis. Objectives: We aimed to (1) determine the amount of nickel, chromium, and cobalt in large samples of used and unused MWFs collected from metalworking plants in Denmark, and (2) evaluate a handheld x-ray fluorescence (XRF) device as a screening instrument for metals in MWFs. Methods: A handheld XRF device was used to screen for metals in MWFs. All samples were also analyzed for concentrations of nickel, chromium, and cobalt using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS). Results: GFAAS analysis showed that 13 of 80 samples (16.3%) contained >1 mg/kg (ppm) nickel (range: 6.4-17.7 mg/kg), 3 of 80 (3.8%) contained >1 (range: 1.4-3.1) mg/kg chromium, and 1 of 80 (1.3%) contained 1.3 mg/kg cobalt. XRF-screening detected nickel in eight samples (range: 2.5-15.5 mg/kg), but only one sample with 3.0 (±0.5) mg/kg was found subsequently to contain 9.9 (0.02) mg/kg nickel by GFAAS. Although no chromium was found by XRF analysis, cobalt was found in two samples with 6 (±1.5) mg/kg and 5 (±1.5) mg/kg, subsequently found to contain 0.1 (±0.01) mg/kg and 0.08 (±0.01) mg/kg by GFAAS. Similar concentrations of nickel were found in used (N = 6, range: 6.4-17.7 mg/kg) and unused MWFs (N = 7, range: 9.1-17.3 mg/kg). Conclusion: Considerable levels of nickel, chromium, and cobalt were found in some used and unused MWFs indicating that these might represent a source of metal allergy. The XRF device is a poor screening test for these metals in MWFs.",
keywords = "allergic contact dermatitis, chromium, cobalt, metals, metalworking fluids, nickel, X-ray fluorescence",
author = "Farzad Alinaghi and Hedberg, {Yolanda S.} and Claus Zachariae and Thyssen, {Jacob P.} and Johansen, {Jeanne D.}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1111/cod.13533",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "83--87",
journal = "Contact Dermatitis",
issn = "0105-1873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metals in used and unused metalworking fluids

T2 - X-ray fluorescence spectrometry as a screening test

AU - Alinaghi, Farzad

AU - Hedberg, Yolanda S.

AU - Zachariae, Claus

AU - Thyssen, Jacob P.

AU - Johansen, Jeanne D.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: Exposure to metalworking fluids (MWFs) is a well-known cause of occupational contact dermatitis. Objectives: We aimed to (1) determine the amount of nickel, chromium, and cobalt in large samples of used and unused MWFs collected from metalworking plants in Denmark, and (2) evaluate a handheld x-ray fluorescence (XRF) device as a screening instrument for metals in MWFs. Methods: A handheld XRF device was used to screen for metals in MWFs. All samples were also analyzed for concentrations of nickel, chromium, and cobalt using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS). Results: GFAAS analysis showed that 13 of 80 samples (16.3%) contained >1 mg/kg (ppm) nickel (range: 6.4-17.7 mg/kg), 3 of 80 (3.8%) contained >1 (range: 1.4-3.1) mg/kg chromium, and 1 of 80 (1.3%) contained 1.3 mg/kg cobalt. XRF-screening detected nickel in eight samples (range: 2.5-15.5 mg/kg), but only one sample with 3.0 (±0.5) mg/kg was found subsequently to contain 9.9 (0.02) mg/kg nickel by GFAAS. Although no chromium was found by XRF analysis, cobalt was found in two samples with 6 (±1.5) mg/kg and 5 (±1.5) mg/kg, subsequently found to contain 0.1 (±0.01) mg/kg and 0.08 (±0.01) mg/kg by GFAAS. Similar concentrations of nickel were found in used (N = 6, range: 6.4-17.7 mg/kg) and unused MWFs (N = 7, range: 9.1-17.3 mg/kg). Conclusion: Considerable levels of nickel, chromium, and cobalt were found in some used and unused MWFs indicating that these might represent a source of metal allergy. The XRF device is a poor screening test for these metals in MWFs.

AB - Background: Exposure to metalworking fluids (MWFs) is a well-known cause of occupational contact dermatitis. Objectives: We aimed to (1) determine the amount of nickel, chromium, and cobalt in large samples of used and unused MWFs collected from metalworking plants in Denmark, and (2) evaluate a handheld x-ray fluorescence (XRF) device as a screening instrument for metals in MWFs. Methods: A handheld XRF device was used to screen for metals in MWFs. All samples were also analyzed for concentrations of nickel, chromium, and cobalt using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS). Results: GFAAS analysis showed that 13 of 80 samples (16.3%) contained >1 mg/kg (ppm) nickel (range: 6.4-17.7 mg/kg), 3 of 80 (3.8%) contained >1 (range: 1.4-3.1) mg/kg chromium, and 1 of 80 (1.3%) contained 1.3 mg/kg cobalt. XRF-screening detected nickel in eight samples (range: 2.5-15.5 mg/kg), but only one sample with 3.0 (±0.5) mg/kg was found subsequently to contain 9.9 (0.02) mg/kg nickel by GFAAS. Although no chromium was found by XRF analysis, cobalt was found in two samples with 6 (±1.5) mg/kg and 5 (±1.5) mg/kg, subsequently found to contain 0.1 (±0.01) mg/kg and 0.08 (±0.01) mg/kg by GFAAS. Similar concentrations of nickel were found in used (N = 6, range: 6.4-17.7 mg/kg) and unused MWFs (N = 7, range: 9.1-17.3 mg/kg). Conclusion: Considerable levels of nickel, chromium, and cobalt were found in some used and unused MWFs indicating that these might represent a source of metal allergy. The XRF device is a poor screening test for these metals in MWFs.

KW - allergic contact dermatitis

KW - chromium

KW - cobalt

KW - metals

KW - metalworking fluids

KW - nickel

KW - X-ray fluorescence

U2 - 10.1111/cod.13533

DO - 10.1111/cod.13533

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32212165

AN - SCOPUS:85083771611

VL - 83

SP - 83

EP - 87

JO - Contact Dermatitis

JF - Contact Dermatitis

SN - 0105-1873

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 258403182