Intraoperative Surgical Strategy in Abdominal Emergency Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Intraoperative Surgical Strategy in Abdominal Emergency Surgery. / Tolstrup, Mai-Britt; Jensen, Thomas Korgaard; Gogenur, Ismail.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 47, 2023, p. 162–170.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tolstrup, M-B, Jensen, TK & Gogenur, I 2023, 'Intraoperative Surgical Strategy in Abdominal Emergency Surgery', World Journal of Surgery, vol. 47, pp. 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06782-9

APA

Tolstrup, M-B., Jensen, T. K., & Gogenur, I. (2023). Intraoperative Surgical Strategy in Abdominal Emergency Surgery. World Journal of Surgery, 47, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06782-9

Vancouver

Tolstrup M-B, Jensen TK, Gogenur I. Intraoperative Surgical Strategy in Abdominal Emergency Surgery. World Journal of Surgery. 2023;47:162–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06782-9

Author

Tolstrup, Mai-Britt ; Jensen, Thomas Korgaard ; Gogenur, Ismail. / Intraoperative Surgical Strategy in Abdominal Emergency Surgery. In: World Journal of Surgery. 2023 ; Vol. 47. pp. 162–170.

Bibtex

@article{026efa8419f14b8ca70d9ad835c9c139,
title = "Intraoperative Surgical Strategy in Abdominal Emergency Surgery",
abstract = "Background Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with a high rate of postoperative complications and death. Pre- and immediate postoperative bundle-care strategies have improved outcome, but so far, no standardized intraoperative strategies have been proposed. We introduced a quality improvement model of specific intra- and postoperative strategies for the heterogenous group of patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. The objective was to evaluate a quality improvement strategy, using an intraoperative, multidisciplinary time-out model in emergency abdominal surgery to apply one of three surgical strategies; definitive-palliative-or damage control surgery. Methods All patients scheduled for any gastrointestinal emergency procedure were stratified dynamically according to standardized criteria for performing definitive-palliative-or damage control surgery. Pre- intra- and postoperative data were collected according to the intraoperative strategy applied. Postoperative complications were displayed according to the Clavien-Dindo-score and the CCI (Comprehensive Complication Index). 30-90-day- and 1-year mortality was presented. Results We included 436 consecutive patients undergoing emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy in 2019. Intraoperative strategy was definitive in 326(75%)-palliative in 90(21%) and damage control approach in 20(4%) patients. CCI was 21(0,45), 30(17,54) and 78(54,100) in the definitive-, the palliative-, and the damage control group, respectively. 30-day mortality was; 11.7%, 26.7% and 30%, and the 1-year mortality was 16.9%, 56.7% and 40% in the definitive- the palliative- and the damage control group, respectively. Conclusions We present a multidisciplinary, intraoperative decision-making standard as a potential quality improvement tool of ensuring individualized intra- and postoperative treatment for every emergency surgical patient and for future research-protocols.",
keywords = "DAMAGE-CONTROL SURGERY, LAPAROTOMY, MORTALITY",
author = "Mai-Britt Tolstrup and Jensen, {Thomas Korgaard} and Ismail Gogenur",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-022-06782-9",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "162–170",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraoperative Surgical Strategy in Abdominal Emergency Surgery

AU - Tolstrup, Mai-Britt

AU - Jensen, Thomas Korgaard

AU - Gogenur, Ismail

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with a high rate of postoperative complications and death. Pre- and immediate postoperative bundle-care strategies have improved outcome, but so far, no standardized intraoperative strategies have been proposed. We introduced a quality improvement model of specific intra- and postoperative strategies for the heterogenous group of patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. The objective was to evaluate a quality improvement strategy, using an intraoperative, multidisciplinary time-out model in emergency abdominal surgery to apply one of three surgical strategies; definitive-palliative-or damage control surgery. Methods All patients scheduled for any gastrointestinal emergency procedure were stratified dynamically according to standardized criteria for performing definitive-palliative-or damage control surgery. Pre- intra- and postoperative data were collected according to the intraoperative strategy applied. Postoperative complications were displayed according to the Clavien-Dindo-score and the CCI (Comprehensive Complication Index). 30-90-day- and 1-year mortality was presented. Results We included 436 consecutive patients undergoing emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy in 2019. Intraoperative strategy was definitive in 326(75%)-palliative in 90(21%) and damage control approach in 20(4%) patients. CCI was 21(0,45), 30(17,54) and 78(54,100) in the definitive-, the palliative-, and the damage control group, respectively. 30-day mortality was; 11.7%, 26.7% and 30%, and the 1-year mortality was 16.9%, 56.7% and 40% in the definitive- the palliative- and the damage control group, respectively. Conclusions We present a multidisciplinary, intraoperative decision-making standard as a potential quality improvement tool of ensuring individualized intra- and postoperative treatment for every emergency surgical patient and for future research-protocols.

AB - Background Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with a high rate of postoperative complications and death. Pre- and immediate postoperative bundle-care strategies have improved outcome, but so far, no standardized intraoperative strategies have been proposed. We introduced a quality improvement model of specific intra- and postoperative strategies for the heterogenous group of patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. The objective was to evaluate a quality improvement strategy, using an intraoperative, multidisciplinary time-out model in emergency abdominal surgery to apply one of three surgical strategies; definitive-palliative-or damage control surgery. Methods All patients scheduled for any gastrointestinal emergency procedure were stratified dynamically according to standardized criteria for performing definitive-palliative-or damage control surgery. Pre- intra- and postoperative data were collected according to the intraoperative strategy applied. Postoperative complications were displayed according to the Clavien-Dindo-score and the CCI (Comprehensive Complication Index). 30-90-day- and 1-year mortality was presented. Results We included 436 consecutive patients undergoing emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy in 2019. Intraoperative strategy was definitive in 326(75%)-palliative in 90(21%) and damage control approach in 20(4%) patients. CCI was 21(0,45), 30(17,54) and 78(54,100) in the definitive-, the palliative-, and the damage control group, respectively. 30-day mortality was; 11.7%, 26.7% and 30%, and the 1-year mortality was 16.9%, 56.7% and 40% in the definitive- the palliative- and the damage control group, respectively. Conclusions We present a multidisciplinary, intraoperative decision-making standard as a potential quality improvement tool of ensuring individualized intra- and postoperative treatment for every emergency surgical patient and for future research-protocols.

KW - DAMAGE-CONTROL SURGERY

KW - LAPAROTOMY

KW - MORTALITY

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-022-06782-9

DO - 10.1007/s00268-022-06782-9

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36221004

VL - 47

SP - 162

EP - 170

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

ER -

ID: 325708410