Intracoronary Compared to Intravenous Abciximab in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reduces Mortality, Target Vessel Revascularization and Reinfarction after 1 Year

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Intracoronary Compared to Intravenous Abciximab in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reduces Mortality, Target Vessel Revascularization and Reinfarction after 1 Year. / Iversen, Allan Zeeberg; Galatius, Soeren; Abildgaard, Ulrik; Galloe, Anders; Hansen, Peter Riis; Pedersen, Sune; Engstroem, Thomas; Jensen, Jan Skov.

In: Cardiology, Vol. 120, No. 1, 2011, p. 43-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Iversen, AZ, Galatius, S, Abildgaard, U, Galloe, A, Hansen, PR, Pedersen, S, Engstroem, T & Jensen, JS 2011, 'Intracoronary Compared to Intravenous Abciximab in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reduces Mortality, Target Vessel Revascularization and Reinfarction after 1 Year', Cardiology, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 43-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000333117

APA

Iversen, A. Z., Galatius, S., Abildgaard, U., Galloe, A., Hansen, P. R., Pedersen, S., Engstroem, T., & Jensen, J. S. (2011). Intracoronary Compared to Intravenous Abciximab in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reduces Mortality, Target Vessel Revascularization and Reinfarction after 1 Year. Cardiology, 120(1), 43-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000333117

Vancouver

Iversen AZ, Galatius S, Abildgaard U, Galloe A, Hansen PR, Pedersen S et al. Intracoronary Compared to Intravenous Abciximab in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reduces Mortality, Target Vessel Revascularization and Reinfarction after 1 Year. Cardiology. 2011;120(1):43-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000333117

Author

Iversen, Allan Zeeberg ; Galatius, Soeren ; Abildgaard, Ulrik ; Galloe, Anders ; Hansen, Peter Riis ; Pedersen, Sune ; Engstroem, Thomas ; Jensen, Jan Skov. / Intracoronary Compared to Intravenous Abciximab in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reduces Mortality, Target Vessel Revascularization and Reinfarction after 1 Year. In: Cardiology. 2011 ; Vol. 120, No. 1. pp. 43-9.

Bibtex

@article{3c242155019040a5b3c5f485d524a2c9,
title = "Intracoronary Compared to Intravenous Abciximab in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reduces Mortality, Target Vessel Revascularization and Reinfarction after 1 Year",
abstract = "Objectives: Administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab to patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) improves outcome. Data have suggested that an intracoronary (IC) bolus might be superior to the standard intravenous (IV) administration. We have previously reported reduced short-term mortality and need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) with the IC route. We now present long-term data from our randomized trial on IC versus IV abciximab in pPCI-treated STEMI patients. Methods: A total of 355 pPCI-treated STEMI patients were randomized to either IC or IV bolus abciximab followed by a 12-hour IV infusion. Patients were followed for 1 year to observe mortality, TVR or myocardial infarction (MI) and the combination of these. Results: The two treatment arms (IV, n = 170; IC, n = 185) were similar with regard to baseline characteristics. Mortality was reduced from 10% in the IV group to 2.7% in the IC group (p = 0.004). TVR and MI were also reduced with IC administration (TVR: 14.1 vs. 7.6%, p = 0.04; MI: 11.8 vs. 5.4%, p = 0.03). Consequently, patients in the IC treatment arm had a relative risk reduction of 55% for the combined endpoint after 1 year (p = 0.002) compared to the IV treatment arm. Conclusions: In pPCI-treated STEMI patients treated with abciximab, IC bolus administration resulted in a significant reduction in mortality, TVR and MI compared to IV bolus administration.",
author = "Iversen, {Allan Zeeberg} and Soeren Galatius and Ulrik Abildgaard and Anders Galloe and Hansen, {Peter Riis} and Sune Pedersen and Thomas Engstroem and Jensen, {Jan Skov}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
year = "2011",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000333117",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "43--9",
journal = "Cardiologia",
issn = "0008-6312",
publisher = "S Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intracoronary Compared to Intravenous Abciximab in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reduces Mortality, Target Vessel Revascularization and Reinfarction after 1 Year

AU - Iversen, Allan Zeeberg

AU - Galatius, Soeren

AU - Abildgaard, Ulrik

AU - Galloe, Anders

AU - Hansen, Peter Riis

AU - Pedersen, Sune

AU - Engstroem, Thomas

AU - Jensen, Jan Skov

N1 - Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objectives: Administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab to patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) improves outcome. Data have suggested that an intracoronary (IC) bolus might be superior to the standard intravenous (IV) administration. We have previously reported reduced short-term mortality and need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) with the IC route. We now present long-term data from our randomized trial on IC versus IV abciximab in pPCI-treated STEMI patients. Methods: A total of 355 pPCI-treated STEMI patients were randomized to either IC or IV bolus abciximab followed by a 12-hour IV infusion. Patients were followed for 1 year to observe mortality, TVR or myocardial infarction (MI) and the combination of these. Results: The two treatment arms (IV, n = 170; IC, n = 185) were similar with regard to baseline characteristics. Mortality was reduced from 10% in the IV group to 2.7% in the IC group (p = 0.004). TVR and MI were also reduced with IC administration (TVR: 14.1 vs. 7.6%, p = 0.04; MI: 11.8 vs. 5.4%, p = 0.03). Consequently, patients in the IC treatment arm had a relative risk reduction of 55% for the combined endpoint after 1 year (p = 0.002) compared to the IV treatment arm. Conclusions: In pPCI-treated STEMI patients treated with abciximab, IC bolus administration resulted in a significant reduction in mortality, TVR and MI compared to IV bolus administration.

AB - Objectives: Administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab to patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) improves outcome. Data have suggested that an intracoronary (IC) bolus might be superior to the standard intravenous (IV) administration. We have previously reported reduced short-term mortality and need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) with the IC route. We now present long-term data from our randomized trial on IC versus IV abciximab in pPCI-treated STEMI patients. Methods: A total of 355 pPCI-treated STEMI patients were randomized to either IC or IV bolus abciximab followed by a 12-hour IV infusion. Patients were followed for 1 year to observe mortality, TVR or myocardial infarction (MI) and the combination of these. Results: The two treatment arms (IV, n = 170; IC, n = 185) were similar with regard to baseline characteristics. Mortality was reduced from 10% in the IV group to 2.7% in the IC group (p = 0.004). TVR and MI were also reduced with IC administration (TVR: 14.1 vs. 7.6%, p = 0.04; MI: 11.8 vs. 5.4%, p = 0.03). Consequently, patients in the IC treatment arm had a relative risk reduction of 55% for the combined endpoint after 1 year (p = 0.002) compared to the IV treatment arm. Conclusions: In pPCI-treated STEMI patients treated with abciximab, IC bolus administration resulted in a significant reduction in mortality, TVR and MI compared to IV bolus administration.

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000333117

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000333117

M3 - Journal article

VL - 120

SP - 43

EP - 49

JO - Cardiologia

JF - Cardiologia

SN - 0008-6312

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 40158725