Standard
Harms to animals - can we agree on how best to limit them? / Sandøe, Peter; Franco, Nuno H.; Lund, Thomas Bøker; Weary, Daniel M.; Olsson, I. Anna S.
Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU: proceedings of a symposium at the Messerli Research Institute, Vienna, March 2013. ed. / Herwig Grimm; Norbert Alzmann; Vera Marashi. Society ALTEX Edition, 2015. p. 28-32 (ALTEX Proceedings; No. 1, Vol. 4).
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research
Harvard
Sandøe, P, Franco, NH
, Lund, TB, Weary, DM & Olsson, IAS 2015,
Harms to animals - can we agree on how best to limit them? in H Grimm, N Alzmann & V Marashi (eds),
Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU: proceedings of a symposium at the Messerli Research Institute, Vienna, March 2013. Society ALTEX Edition, ALTEX Proceedings, no. 1, vol. 4, pp. 28-32, Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU, Vienna, Austria,
26/03/2013. <
http://www.altex.ch/ALTEX-Proceedings/Proceedings.98.html?iid=6>
APA
Sandøe, P., Franco, N. H.
, Lund, T. B., Weary, D. M., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2015).
Harms to animals - can we agree on how best to limit them? In H. Grimm, N. Alzmann, & V. Marashi (Eds.),
Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU: proceedings of a symposium at the Messerli Research Institute, Vienna, March 2013 (pp. 28-32). Society ALTEX Edition. ALTEX Proceedings Vol. 4 No. 1
http://www.altex.ch/ALTEX-Proceedings/Proceedings.98.html?iid=6
Vancouver
Sandøe P, Franco NH, Lund TB, Weary DM, Olsson IAS. Harms to animals - can we agree on how best to limit them? In Grimm H, Alzmann N, Marashi V, editors, Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU: proceedings of a symposium at the Messerli Research Institute, Vienna, March 2013. Society ALTEX Edition. 2015. p. 28-32. (ALTEX Proceedings; No. 1, Vol. 4).
Author
Sandøe, Peter ; Franco, Nuno H. ; Lund, Thomas Bøker ; Weary, Daniel M. ; Olsson, I. Anna S. / Harms to animals - can we agree on how best to limit them?. Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU: proceedings of a symposium at the Messerli Research Institute, Vienna, March 2013. editor / Herwig Grimm ; Norbert Alzmann ; Vera Marashi. Society ALTEX Edition, 2015. pp. 28-32 (ALTEX Proceedings; No. 1, Vol. 4).
Bibtex
@inproceedings{d93c1b46c50a450983d6b29d51e4b378,
title = "Harms to animals - can we agree on how best to limit them?",
abstract = "The harm benefit framework seems to have wide public support as a basis for making decisions about the use of animals in biomedical research. The present paper, which is the first of two papers that deal with the conceptual underpinningof the harm-benefit analysis, focuses on the assessment of harms to animals. The goals of the 3Rs have gained wide acceptance over the 50 years since they were first proposed. However, there are controversial ethical issues hidden within the 3Rs principle. Five such hidden value conflicts are highlighted and it is argued that these conflicts challenge the idea that adherence to the 3Rs is bound to generate a wide public consensus. It is argued that underlying value differences will lead to conflicting interpretations of how to apply the 3Rs and thereby decide when and how to limit the harm imposed on animals.",
author = "Peter Sand{\o}e and Franco, {Nuno H.} and Lund, {Thomas B{\o}ker} and Weary, {Daniel M.} and Olsson, {I. Anna S.}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
series = "ALTEX Proceedings",
publisher = "Society ALTEX Edition",
number = "1",
pages = "28--32",
editor = "{ Grimm}, Herwig and Alzmann, {Norbert } and { Marashi}, Vera",
booktitle = "Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU",
note = "Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU ; Conference date: 26-03-2013 Through 27-03-2013",
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Harms to animals - can we agree on how best to limit them?
AU - Sandøe, Peter
AU - Franco, Nuno H.
AU - Lund, Thomas Bøker
AU - Weary, Daniel M.
AU - Olsson, I. Anna S.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The harm benefit framework seems to have wide public support as a basis for making decisions about the use of animals in biomedical research. The present paper, which is the first of two papers that deal with the conceptual underpinningof the harm-benefit analysis, focuses on the assessment of harms to animals. The goals of the 3Rs have gained wide acceptance over the 50 years since they were first proposed. However, there are controversial ethical issues hidden within the 3Rs principle. Five such hidden value conflicts are highlighted and it is argued that these conflicts challenge the idea that adherence to the 3Rs is bound to generate a wide public consensus. It is argued that underlying value differences will lead to conflicting interpretations of how to apply the 3Rs and thereby decide when and how to limit the harm imposed on animals.
AB - The harm benefit framework seems to have wide public support as a basis for making decisions about the use of animals in biomedical research. The present paper, which is the first of two papers that deal with the conceptual underpinningof the harm-benefit analysis, focuses on the assessment of harms to animals. The goals of the 3Rs have gained wide acceptance over the 50 years since they were first proposed. However, there are controversial ethical issues hidden within the 3Rs principle. Five such hidden value conflicts are highlighted and it is argued that these conflicts challenge the idea that adherence to the 3Rs is bound to generate a wide public consensus. It is argued that underlying value differences will lead to conflicting interpretations of how to apply the 3Rs and thereby decide when and how to limit the harm imposed on animals.
M3 - Article in proceedings
T3 - ALTEX Proceedings
SP - 28
EP - 32
BT - Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU
A2 - Grimm, Herwig
A2 - Alzmann, Norbert
A2 - Marashi, Vera
PB - Society ALTEX Edition
T2 - Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU
Y2 - 26 March 2013 through 27 March 2013
ER -
