Ensuring face validity in patient-related outcome scores - A matter of content

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Ensuring face validity in patient-related outcome scores - A matter of content. / Comins, J.; Krogsgaard, M.; Brodersen, J.

In: Knee, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2012, p. 72-78.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Comins, J, Krogsgaard, M & Brodersen, J 2012, 'Ensuring face validity in patient-related outcome scores - A matter of content', Knee, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 72-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.005

APA

Comins, J., Krogsgaard, M., & Brodersen, J. (2012). Ensuring face validity in patient-related outcome scores - A matter of content. Knee, 20(2), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.005

Vancouver

Comins J, Krogsgaard M, Brodersen J. Ensuring face validity in patient-related outcome scores - A matter of content. Knee. 2012;20(2):72-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.005

Author

Comins, J. ; Krogsgaard, M. ; Brodersen, J. / Ensuring face validity in patient-related outcome scores - A matter of content. In: Knee. 2012 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 72-78.

Bibtex

@article{186b579a883b47b9882b7d045b1deec3,

title = "Ensuring face validity in patient-related outcome scores - A matter of content",

abstract = "Patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires are increasingly used to measure treatment effect in patients with knee pathology. PROs commonly used to assess outcome in patients with knee conditions can be generic, knee-specific, or condition-specific. Most PROs have been created based on clinician-based consensus and are not patient-centered. Items (questions plus their response options) in PROs can be generated by clinicians or through patient interviews. Items created by clinicians possess face validity. The objective of this study was to find all existing PRO items with potentially relevant content for patients with knee pathology.",

author = "J. Comins and M. Krogsgaard and J. Brodersen",

year = "2012",

doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.005",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "72--78",

journal = "Knee",

issn = "0968-0160",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ensuring face validity in patient-related outcome scores - A matter of content

AU - Comins, J.

AU - Krogsgaard, M.

AU - Brodersen, J.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires are increasingly used to measure treatment effect in patients with knee pathology. PROs commonly used to assess outcome in patients with knee conditions can be generic, knee-specific, or condition-specific. Most PROs have been created based on clinician-based consensus and are not patient-centered. Items (questions plus their response options) in PROs can be generated by clinicians or through patient interviews. Items created by clinicians possess face validity. The objective of this study was to find all existing PRO items with potentially relevant content for patients with knee pathology.

AB - Patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires are increasingly used to measure treatment effect in patients with knee pathology. PROs commonly used to assess outcome in patients with knee conditions can be generic, knee-specific, or condition-specific. Most PROs have been created based on clinician-based consensus and are not patient-centered. Items (questions plus their response options) in PROs can be generated by clinicians or through patient interviews. Items created by clinicians possess face validity. The objective of this study was to find all existing PRO items with potentially relevant content for patients with knee pathology.

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.005

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 72

EP - 78

JO - Knee

JF - Knee

SN - 0968-0160

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 44305698