Electrocardiographic findings in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and right bundle branch block ventricular tachycardia

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 24.7 MB, PDF document

  • Mikael Laredo
  • Oholi Tovia-Brodie
  • Anat Milman
  • Yoav Michowitz
  • Rob W Roudijk
  • Giovanni Peretto
  • Nicolas Badenco
  • Anneline S J M Te Riele
  • Simone Sala
  • Guillaume Duthoit
  • Elena Arbelo
  • Sandro Ninni
  • Alessio Gasperetti
  • J Peter van Tintelen
  • Gabriele Paglino
  • Xavier Waintraub
  • Antoine Andorin
  • Petr Peichl
  • Laurens P Bosman
  • Leonardo Calo
  • Carla Giustetto
  • Andrea Radinovic
  • Paloma Jorda
  • Ruben Casado-Arroyo
  • Esther Zorio
  • Francisco J Bermúdez-Jiménez
  • Elijah R Behr
  • Stepan Havranek
  • Frederic Sacher
  • Jean-Sylvain Hermida
  • Eyal Nof
  • Michela Casella
  • Josef Kautzner
  • Dominique Lacroix
  • Josep Brugada
  • Firat Duru
  • Paolo Della Bella
  • Estelle Gandjbakhch
  • Richard Hauer
  • Bernard Belhassen

AIMS: Little is known about patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB)-ventricular tachycardia (VT) and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). Our aims were: (i) to describe electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics of sinus rhythm (SR) and VT; (ii) to correlate SR with RBBB-VT ECGs; and (iii) to compare VT ECGs with electro-anatomic mapping (EAM) data.

METHODS AND RESULTS: From the European Survey on ACM, 70 patients with spontaneous RBBB-VT were included. Putative left ventricular (LV) sites of origin (SOOs) were estimated with a VT-axis-derived methodology and confirmed by EAM data when available. Overall, 49 (70%) patients met definite Task Force Criteria. Low QRS voltage predominated in lateral leads (n = 37, 55%), but QRS fragmentation was more frequent in inferior leads (n = 15, 23%). T-wave inversion (TWI) was equally frequent in inferior (n = 28, 42%) and lateral (n = 27, 40%) leads. TWI in inferior leads was associated with reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF; 46 ± 10 vs. 53 ± 8, P = 0.02). Regarding SOOs, the inferior wall harboured 31 (46%) SOOs, followed by the lateral wall (n = 17, 25%), the anterior wall (n = 15, 22%), and the septum (n = 4, 6%). EAM data were available for 16 patients and showed good concordance with the putative SOOs. In all patients with superior-axis RBBB-VT who underwent endo-epicardial VT activation mapping, VT originated from the LV.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACM and RBBB-VT, RBBB-VTs originated mainly from the inferior and lateral LV walls. SR depolarization and repolarization abnormalities were frequent and associated with underlying variants.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Volume25
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)1025–1034
ISSN1099-5129
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

ID: 333437528