Defining malnutrition in persons with spinal cord injury – does the Global Criteria for Malnutrition work?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Defining malnutrition in persons with spinal cord injury – does the Global Criteria for Malnutrition work? / Slettahjell, Hanne Bjørg; Bastakis, Maria; Biering-Sørensen, Fin; Strøm, Vegard; Henriksen, Christine.
In: Food and Nutrition Research, Vol. 68, 9989, 2024.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining malnutrition in persons with spinal cord injury – does the Global Criteria for Malnutrition work?
AU - Slettahjell, Hanne Bjørg
AU - Bastakis, Maria
AU - Biering-Sørensen, Fin
AU - Strøm, Vegard
AU - Henriksen, Christine
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024, Swedish Nutrition Foundation. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background and aims: Physiologic and metabolic changes following spinal cord injury (SCI) lead to an increased risk of malnutrition. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) is a three-step approach to diag-nose malnutrition: 1) screening; 2) phenotypic and etiological criteria; and 3) malnutrition severity. The main aim of this study was to assess malnutrition in patients with SCI, according to the GLIM criteria. Methods: Patients with SCI (≥ 18 years) admitted to rehabilitation were included. Anthropometrics, food intake, and inflammation were assessed on admission. Fat-free mass index (FFMI) was estimated from bio-impedance analysis. Malnutrition was diagnosed by the GLIM criteria, using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) as the first step screening tool. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed. Results: In total, 66 patients were assessed (50 men) with a mean age of 51.4 (± 17.4) years and median time since injury was 37.5 (10–450) days. The mean body mass index was 24.7 (± 4.2) kg/m2, and 1-month involun-tary weight loss was 5.7 (± 4.4)%. FFMI for men was 17.3 (± 1.9) and for women 15.3 (± 1.6) kg/m2. Forty-one patients (62%) were malnourished according to the GLIM criteria: 27 moderately and 14 severely malnour-ished. MUST was not able to detect malnutrition risk of nine patients, giving a moderate agreement (kappa 0.66), with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.92 compared to the GLIM diagnosis. Conclusions: In this cross-sectional study, 62% of subacute SCI patients were malnourished according to the GLIM criteria. The screening tool MUST showed moderate agreement with the GLIM criteria and did not detect risk of all patients with a malnutrition diagnosis. The clinical implications of these findings need further investigation.
AB - Background and aims: Physiologic and metabolic changes following spinal cord injury (SCI) lead to an increased risk of malnutrition. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) is a three-step approach to diag-nose malnutrition: 1) screening; 2) phenotypic and etiological criteria; and 3) malnutrition severity. The main aim of this study was to assess malnutrition in patients with SCI, according to the GLIM criteria. Methods: Patients with SCI (≥ 18 years) admitted to rehabilitation were included. Anthropometrics, food intake, and inflammation were assessed on admission. Fat-free mass index (FFMI) was estimated from bio-impedance analysis. Malnutrition was diagnosed by the GLIM criteria, using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) as the first step screening tool. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed. Results: In total, 66 patients were assessed (50 men) with a mean age of 51.4 (± 17.4) years and median time since injury was 37.5 (10–450) days. The mean body mass index was 24.7 (± 4.2) kg/m2, and 1-month involun-tary weight loss was 5.7 (± 4.4)%. FFMI for men was 17.3 (± 1.9) and for women 15.3 (± 1.6) kg/m2. Forty-one patients (62%) were malnourished according to the GLIM criteria: 27 moderately and 14 severely malnour-ished. MUST was not able to detect malnutrition risk of nine patients, giving a moderate agreement (kappa 0.66), with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.92 compared to the GLIM diagnosis. Conclusions: In this cross-sectional study, 62% of subacute SCI patients were malnourished according to the GLIM criteria. The screening tool MUST showed moderate agreement with the GLIM criteria and did not detect risk of all patients with a malnutrition diagnosis. The clinical implications of these findings need further investigation.
KW - fat-free mass
KW - malnutrition
KW - rehabilitation
KW - spinal cord
U2 - 10.29219/fnr.v68.9989
DO - 10.29219/fnr.v68.9989
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85188841182
VL - 68
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition/Naringsforskning, Supplement
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition/Naringsforskning, Supplement
SN - 1102-6510
M1 - 9989
ER -
ID: 387257224