Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent: retrospective results from a tertiary clinic suggesting an association with facial dermatitis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent : retrospective results from a tertiary clinic suggesting an association with facial dermatitis. / Schwensen, J F; Menné, T; Johansen, J D; Thyssen, J P.

In: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Vol. 30, No. 10, 10.2016, p. 1768-1773.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schwensen, JF, Menné, T, Johansen, JD & Thyssen, JP 2016, 'Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent: retrospective results from a tertiary clinic suggesting an association with facial dermatitis', Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1768-1773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13684

APA

Schwensen, J. F., Menné, T., Johansen, J. D., & Thyssen, J. P. (2016). Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent: retrospective results from a tertiary clinic suggesting an association with facial dermatitis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 30(10), 1768-1773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13684

Vancouver

Schwensen JF, Menné T, Johansen JD, Thyssen JP. Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent: retrospective results from a tertiary clinic suggesting an association with facial dermatitis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2016 Oct;30(10):1768-1773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13684

Author

Schwensen, J F ; Menné, T ; Johansen, J D ; Thyssen, J P. / Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent : retrospective results from a tertiary clinic suggesting an association with facial dermatitis. In: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 10. pp. 1768-1773.

Bibtex

@article{8ecbc114d301418e87abde527574b6e8,
title = "Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent: retrospective results from a tertiary clinic suggesting an association with facial dermatitis",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Chemicals used for the manufacturing of rubber are known causes of allergic contact dermatitis on the hands. Recent European studies have suggested a decrease in thiuram contact allergy. Moreover, while an association with hand dermatitis is well established, we have recently observed several clinical cases with allergic facial dermatitis to rubber.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate temporal trends of contact allergy to rubber accelerators from the European baseline series in a tertiary patch test clinic in Denmark, and examine associations with anatomical locations of dermatitis.METHODS: Patch test and clinical data collected in a Danish tertiary dermatology clinic in Gentofte, Herlev, Copenhagen between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2014 were analysed. The following rubber accelerators or mixtures in petrolatum from the European baseline patch test series were included: thiuram mix 1.0%, mercaptobenzothiazole 2.0% and mercapto mix 1.0%.RESULTS: The overall prevalence of contact allergy to rubber accelerators was 3.1% with no significant change during the study period (Ptrend = 0.667). Contact allergy to thiuram mix was the most prevalent and was significantly associated with occupational contact dermatitis, hand dermatitis, age >40 years and facial dermatitis in adjusted binary logistic regression analysis. Current clinical relevance of contact allergy to thiuram mix was 59.3%. Patients with contact allergy to mercapto mix and mercaptobenzothiazole had a concomitant reaction to thiuram mix in 35.2% (19/54) and 35.4% (17/48) of the cases respectively.CONCLUSION: Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent. Clinicians should be aware of the hitherto unexplored clinical association with facial dermatitis.",
keywords = "Adult, Dermatitis, Contact, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Prevalence, Retrospective Studies, Rubber, Journal Article",
author = "Schwensen, {J F} and T Menn{\'e} and Johansen, {J D} and Thyssen, {J P}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2016 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.",
year = "2016",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1111/jdv.13684",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "1768--1773",
journal = "Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology",
issn = "0926-9959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent

T2 - retrospective results from a tertiary clinic suggesting an association with facial dermatitis

AU - Schwensen, J F

AU - Menné, T

AU - Johansen, J D

AU - Thyssen, J P

N1 - © 2016 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Chemicals used for the manufacturing of rubber are known causes of allergic contact dermatitis on the hands. Recent European studies have suggested a decrease in thiuram contact allergy. Moreover, while an association with hand dermatitis is well established, we have recently observed several clinical cases with allergic facial dermatitis to rubber.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate temporal trends of contact allergy to rubber accelerators from the European baseline series in a tertiary patch test clinic in Denmark, and examine associations with anatomical locations of dermatitis.METHODS: Patch test and clinical data collected in a Danish tertiary dermatology clinic in Gentofte, Herlev, Copenhagen between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2014 were analysed. The following rubber accelerators or mixtures in petrolatum from the European baseline patch test series were included: thiuram mix 1.0%, mercaptobenzothiazole 2.0% and mercapto mix 1.0%.RESULTS: The overall prevalence of contact allergy to rubber accelerators was 3.1% with no significant change during the study period (Ptrend = 0.667). Contact allergy to thiuram mix was the most prevalent and was significantly associated with occupational contact dermatitis, hand dermatitis, age >40 years and facial dermatitis in adjusted binary logistic regression analysis. Current clinical relevance of contact allergy to thiuram mix was 59.3%. Patients with contact allergy to mercapto mix and mercaptobenzothiazole had a concomitant reaction to thiuram mix in 35.2% (19/54) and 35.4% (17/48) of the cases respectively.CONCLUSION: Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent. Clinicians should be aware of the hitherto unexplored clinical association with facial dermatitis.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Chemicals used for the manufacturing of rubber are known causes of allergic contact dermatitis on the hands. Recent European studies have suggested a decrease in thiuram contact allergy. Moreover, while an association with hand dermatitis is well established, we have recently observed several clinical cases with allergic facial dermatitis to rubber.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate temporal trends of contact allergy to rubber accelerators from the European baseline series in a tertiary patch test clinic in Denmark, and examine associations with anatomical locations of dermatitis.METHODS: Patch test and clinical data collected in a Danish tertiary dermatology clinic in Gentofte, Herlev, Copenhagen between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2014 were analysed. The following rubber accelerators or mixtures in petrolatum from the European baseline patch test series were included: thiuram mix 1.0%, mercaptobenzothiazole 2.0% and mercapto mix 1.0%.RESULTS: The overall prevalence of contact allergy to rubber accelerators was 3.1% with no significant change during the study period (Ptrend = 0.667). Contact allergy to thiuram mix was the most prevalent and was significantly associated with occupational contact dermatitis, hand dermatitis, age >40 years and facial dermatitis in adjusted binary logistic regression analysis. Current clinical relevance of contact allergy to thiuram mix was 59.3%. Patients with contact allergy to mercapto mix and mercaptobenzothiazole had a concomitant reaction to thiuram mix in 35.2% (19/54) and 35.4% (17/48) of the cases respectively.CONCLUSION: Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent. Clinicians should be aware of the hitherto unexplored clinical association with facial dermatitis.

KW - Adult

KW - Dermatitis, Contact

KW - Face

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Prevalence

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Rubber

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1111/jdv.13684

DO - 10.1111/jdv.13684

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27145980

VL - 30

SP - 1768

EP - 1773

JO - Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

JF - Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

SN - 0926-9959

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 177055563