Clinical Recovery Among Individuals With a First-Episode Schizophrenia an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Standard
Clinical Recovery Among Individuals With a First-Episode Schizophrenia an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. / Hansen, Helene Gjervig; Speyer, Helene; Starzer, Marie; Albert, Nikolai; Hjorthøj, Carsten; Eplov, Lene Falgaard; Nordentoft, Merete.
In: Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2023, p. 297–308.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Recovery Among Individuals With a First-Episode Schizophrenia an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Hansen, Helene Gjervig
AU - Speyer, Helene
AU - Starzer, Marie
AU - Albert, Nikolai
AU - Hjorthøj, Carsten
AU - Eplov, Lene Falgaard
AU - Nordentoft, Merete
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background and Hypothesis Through decades the clinical recovery outcomes among individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia have been highly inconsistent ranging from 13.5% to 57%. The primary objective of this updated examination was to report the pooled estimate and explore various moderators to improve the understanding of the course of schizophrenia. Study Design A systematic literature search was set up on PubMed, PsycInfo, and EMBASE until January 13th, 2022. Both observational and interventional studies among cohorts of individuals with the first episode of schizophrenia reporting on clinical recovery were included. The PRISMA 2020 statement was used and data was extracted for a random-effects meta-analysis, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study Results A 20.8% (95% CI = 17.3 to 24.8) recovery rate was found among 26 unique study samples (mean trial duration, 9.5 years) including 3877 individuals (mean age, 26.4 years). In meta-regression none of the following study characteristics could uncover the diverse reported recovery rates; age at inclusion (P = .84), year of inclusion (P = .93), follow-up time (P = .99), drop-out rate (P = .07), or strictness of the recovery criteria (P = .35). Furthermore, no differences in recovery were found between early intervention services (EIS; 19.5%; 95% CI = 15.0 to 24.8) compared to other interventions (21%; 95% CI = 16.9 to 25.8), P = .65. Conclusions A clinical recovery rate of approximately 21% was found with minimum impact from various moderators. The rate was not different comparing EIS with other interventions implying that new initiatives are needed to improve the rate of recovery.
AB - Background and Hypothesis Through decades the clinical recovery outcomes among individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia have been highly inconsistent ranging from 13.5% to 57%. The primary objective of this updated examination was to report the pooled estimate and explore various moderators to improve the understanding of the course of schizophrenia. Study Design A systematic literature search was set up on PubMed, PsycInfo, and EMBASE until January 13th, 2022. Both observational and interventional studies among cohorts of individuals with the first episode of schizophrenia reporting on clinical recovery were included. The PRISMA 2020 statement was used and data was extracted for a random-effects meta-analysis, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study Results A 20.8% (95% CI = 17.3 to 24.8) recovery rate was found among 26 unique study samples (mean trial duration, 9.5 years) including 3877 individuals (mean age, 26.4 years). In meta-regression none of the following study characteristics could uncover the diverse reported recovery rates; age at inclusion (P = .84), year of inclusion (P = .93), follow-up time (P = .99), drop-out rate (P = .07), or strictness of the recovery criteria (P = .35). Furthermore, no differences in recovery were found between early intervention services (EIS; 19.5%; 95% CI = 15.0 to 24.8) compared to other interventions (21%; 95% CI = 16.9 to 25.8), P = .65. Conclusions A clinical recovery rate of approximately 21% was found with minimum impact from various moderators. The rate was not different comparing EIS with other interventions implying that new initiatives are needed to improve the rate of recovery.
KW - recovery
KW - first-episode schizophrenia
KW - first-episode psychosis
KW - schizophrenia
KW - early intervention services
KW - 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
KW - 1ST EPISODE
KW - NATURAL-HISTORY
KW - PSYCHOSIS
KW - PREDICTORS
KW - REMISSION
KW - PROGNOSIS
KW - CRITERIA
KW - COHORT
U2 - 10.1093/schbul/sbac103
DO - 10.1093/schbul/sbac103
M3 - Review
C2 - 36029094
VL - 49
SP - 297
EP - 308
JO - Schizophrenia Bulletin
JF - Schizophrenia Bulletin
SN - 0586-7614
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 319412531