Bacterial species to be considered in quality assurance of mice and rats

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Bacterial species to be considered in quality assurance of mice and rats. / Hansen, Axel Kornerup; Nielsen, Dennis Sandris; Krych, Lukasz; Hansen, Camilla Hartmann Friis.

In: Laboratory Animals, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2019, p. 281-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hansen, AK, Nielsen, DS, Krych, L & Hansen, CHF 2019, 'Bacterial species to be considered in quality assurance of mice and rats', Laboratory Animals, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677219834324

APA

Hansen, A. K., Nielsen, D. S., Krych, L., & Hansen, C. H. F. (2019). Bacterial species to be considered in quality assurance of mice and rats. Laboratory Animals, 53(3), 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677219834324

Vancouver

Hansen AK, Nielsen DS, Krych L, Hansen CHF. Bacterial species to be considered in quality assurance of mice and rats. Laboratory Animals. 2019;53(3):281-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677219834324

Author

Hansen, Axel Kornerup ; Nielsen, Dennis Sandris ; Krych, Lukasz ; Hansen, Camilla Hartmann Friis. / Bacterial species to be considered in quality assurance of mice and rats. In: Laboratory Animals. 2019 ; Vol. 53, No. 3. pp. 281-291.

Bibtex

@article{d7ba213306ee4181a43bc640339e0728,
title = "Bacterial species to be considered in quality assurance of mice and rats",
abstract = "Bacteria are relevant in rodent quality assurance programmes if (a) the animals are at risk and (b) presence in the animals makes a difference for animal research or welfare, for example because the agent regulates clinical disease progression or impacts its host in other ways. Furthermore, zoonoses are relevant. Some bacterial species internationally recommended for the health monitoring of rats and mice, that is, Citrobacter rodentium, Corynebacterium kutscheri, Salmonella spp. and Streptococcus pneumonia, are no longer found in either laboratory or pet shop rats or mice, while there is still a real risk of impact on animal research and welfare from Filobacterium rodentium, Clostridium piliforme, Mycoplasma spp., Helicobacter spp. and Rodentibacter spp., while Streptobacillus moniliformis may be considered a serious zoonotic agent in spite of a very low risk. Modern molecular techniques have revealed that there may, depending on the research type, be equally good reasons for knowing the colony status of some commensal bacteria that are essential for the induction of specific rodent models, such as Alistipes spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, Bifidobacterium spp., Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides vulgatus, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Prevotella copri and segmented filamentous bacteria. In future, research groups should therefore consider the presence or absence of a short list of defined bacterial species relevant for their models. This list can be tested by cost-effective sequencing or even a simple multiple polymerase chain reaction approach, which is likely to be cost-neutral compared to more traditional screening methods.",
keywords = "disease model, ethics and welfare, microorganism, organisms and models, quality assurance, control",
author = "Hansen, {Axel Kornerup} and Nielsen, {Dennis Sandris} and Lukasz Krych and Hansen, {Camilla Hartmann Friis}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0023677219834324",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "281--291",
journal = "Laboratory Animals",
issn = "0023-6772",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bacterial species to be considered in quality assurance of mice and rats

AU - Hansen, Axel Kornerup

AU - Nielsen, Dennis Sandris

AU - Krych, Lukasz

AU - Hansen, Camilla Hartmann Friis

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Bacteria are relevant in rodent quality assurance programmes if (a) the animals are at risk and (b) presence in the animals makes a difference for animal research or welfare, for example because the agent regulates clinical disease progression or impacts its host in other ways. Furthermore, zoonoses are relevant. Some bacterial species internationally recommended for the health monitoring of rats and mice, that is, Citrobacter rodentium, Corynebacterium kutscheri, Salmonella spp. and Streptococcus pneumonia, are no longer found in either laboratory or pet shop rats or mice, while there is still a real risk of impact on animal research and welfare from Filobacterium rodentium, Clostridium piliforme, Mycoplasma spp., Helicobacter spp. and Rodentibacter spp., while Streptobacillus moniliformis may be considered a serious zoonotic agent in spite of a very low risk. Modern molecular techniques have revealed that there may, depending on the research type, be equally good reasons for knowing the colony status of some commensal bacteria that are essential for the induction of specific rodent models, such as Alistipes spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, Bifidobacterium spp., Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides vulgatus, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Prevotella copri and segmented filamentous bacteria. In future, research groups should therefore consider the presence or absence of a short list of defined bacterial species relevant for their models. This list can be tested by cost-effective sequencing or even a simple multiple polymerase chain reaction approach, which is likely to be cost-neutral compared to more traditional screening methods.

AB - Bacteria are relevant in rodent quality assurance programmes if (a) the animals are at risk and (b) presence in the animals makes a difference for animal research or welfare, for example because the agent regulates clinical disease progression or impacts its host in other ways. Furthermore, zoonoses are relevant. Some bacterial species internationally recommended for the health monitoring of rats and mice, that is, Citrobacter rodentium, Corynebacterium kutscheri, Salmonella spp. and Streptococcus pneumonia, are no longer found in either laboratory or pet shop rats or mice, while there is still a real risk of impact on animal research and welfare from Filobacterium rodentium, Clostridium piliforme, Mycoplasma spp., Helicobacter spp. and Rodentibacter spp., while Streptobacillus moniliformis may be considered a serious zoonotic agent in spite of a very low risk. Modern molecular techniques have revealed that there may, depending on the research type, be equally good reasons for knowing the colony status of some commensal bacteria that are essential for the induction of specific rodent models, such as Alistipes spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, Bifidobacterium spp., Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides vulgatus, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Prevotella copri and segmented filamentous bacteria. In future, research groups should therefore consider the presence or absence of a short list of defined bacterial species relevant for their models. This list can be tested by cost-effective sequencing or even a simple multiple polymerase chain reaction approach, which is likely to be cost-neutral compared to more traditional screening methods.

KW - disease model

KW - ethics and welfare

KW - microorganism

KW - organisms and models

KW - quality assurance

KW - control

U2 - 10.1177/0023677219834324

DO - 10.1177/0023677219834324

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31096877

VL - 53

SP - 281

EP - 291

JO - Laboratory Animals

JF - Laboratory Animals

SN - 0023-6772

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 223071892