Association between Fertility Treatment and Cancer Risk in Children

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Importance: An increasing number of children worldwide are born after the use of fertility treatment, although it remains unclear whether the treatment affects the risk of childhood cancer and whether any associations observed are due to the use of specific drugs, the use of specific procedures, or the underlying infertility. Objective: To examine the association between different types of fertility treatments and cancer risk in children. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study based on Danish population-based registry data and the Danish Infertility Cohort (individual record linkage) that included 1085172 children born in Denmark between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2012, linked with parental information. There were a total of 2217 children diagnosed with cancer (follow-up occurred during 1996-2015). Exposures: Maternal fertility treatment during the index pregnancy, including the use of fertility drugs (clomiphene [n = 33835], gonadotropins [n = 57136], gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs [n = 38653], human chorionic gonadotropin [n = 68181], progesterone [n = 41628], and estrogen [n = 16948]) and assisted reproductive technology (in vitro fertilization [n = 19448], intracytoplasmic sperm injection [n = 13417], and frozen embryo transfer [n = 3356]). Each exposure was examined separately and compared with children born to fertile women. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios and incidence rate differences for childhood cancer. Results: After 12.2 million person-years of follow-up (mean, 11.3 years), the incidence rate of childhood cancer was 17.5 per 100000 for children born to fertile women (n = 910291) and 44.4 per 100000 for children born after the use of frozen embryo transfer (n = 3356). Compared with children born to fertile women, the use of frozen embryo transfer was associated with an elevated risk of childhood cancer (14 cancer cases; hazard ratio, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.44 to 4.11]; incidence rate difference, 26.9 [95% CI, 2.8 to 51.0] per 100000), mainly due to an increased risk of leukemia (5 cancer cases; incidence rate, 14.4 per 100000; hazard ratio, 2.87 [95% CI, 1.19 to 6.93]; incidence rate difference, 10.1 [95% CI, -4.0 to 24.2] per 100000) and sympathetic nervous system tumors (<5 cancer cases; hazard ratio, 7.82 [95% CI, 2.47 to 24.70]). There were no statistically significant associations with the use of the other types of fertility treatment examined. Conclusions and Relevance: Among children born in Denmark, the use of frozen embryo transfer, compared with children born to fertile women, was associated with a small but statistically significant increased risk of childhood cancer; this association was not found for the use of other types of fertility treatment examined.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJ A M A: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume322
Issue number22
Pages (from-to)2203-2210
Number of pages8
ISSN0098-7484
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

ID: 233721503