Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) 2016/429): infection with Gyrodactylus salaris (GS)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 20.9 MB, PDF document

  • EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare
  • Julio Alvarez
  • Paolo Calistri
  • Elisabetta Canali
  • Julian Ashley Drewe
  • Bruno Garin-Bastuji
  • José Luis Gonzales Rojas
  • Christian Gortázar
  • Mette S Herskin
  • Virginie Michel
  • Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
  • Barbara Padalino
  • Helen Clare Roberts
  • Hans Spoolder
  • Karl Ståhl
  • Antonio Velarde
  • Arvo Viltrop
  • Christoph Winckler
  • James Bron
  • Niels Jorgen Olesen
  • Hilde Sindre
  • David Stone
  • Niccolò Vendramin
  • Sotiria Eleni Antoniou
  • Anna Eleonora Karagianni
  • Lisa Kohnle
  • Alexandra Papanikolaou
  • Dominique Joseph Bicout
Infection with Gyrodactylus salaris was assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular, the criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as laid down in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to infection with G.?salaris. The assessment was performed following the ad hoc method for data collection and assessment previously developed by AHAW panel and already published. The outcome reported is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥?66%) or not (upper bound ≤?33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with an uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether infection with G.?salaris can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33?70% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that Infection with G.?salaris does not meet the criteria in Section 1 and 3 (Category A and C; 1?5% and 10?33% probability of fulfilling the criteria, respectively) and it is uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 2, 4 and 5 (Categories B, D and E; 33?80%, 33?66% and 33?80% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for infection with G.?salaris according to Article 8 criteria are provided.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere08325
JournalEFSA Journal
Volume21
Issue number10
Number of pages81
ISSN1831-4732
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

    Research areas

  • aquatic animals, Animal Health Law, Gyrodactylus salaris, G. salaris, listing, categorisation, impact

ID: 371382942