A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearch

Standard

A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys. / Meyerhoff, Jürgen; Mørkbak, Morten; Olsen, Søren Bøye.

2012. Paper presented at European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Prague, Czech Republic.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearch

Harvard

Meyerhoff, J, Mørkbak, M & Olsen, SB 2012, 'A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys', Paper presented at European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Prague, Czech Republic, 27/06/2012 - 30/06/2012. <http://www.webmeets.com/EAERE/2012/prog/viewpaper.asp?pid=554>

APA

Meyerhoff, J., Mørkbak, M., & Olsen, S. B. (2012). A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys. Paper presented at European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Prague, Czech Republic. http://www.webmeets.com/EAERE/2012/prog/viewpaper.asp?pid=554

Vancouver

Meyerhoff J, Mørkbak M, Olsen SB. A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys. 2012. Paper presented at European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Prague, Czech Republic.

Author

Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Mørkbak, Morten ; Olsen, Søren Bøye. / A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys. Paper presented at European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Prague, Czech Republic.28 p.

Bibtex

@conference{7ceef11551044a74951cb33f2382cbcf,
title = "A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys",
abstract = "It is well known that some percentage of respondents participating in Stated Preference surveys will not give responses that reflect their true preferences. One reason is protest behaviour. If the distribution of protest responses is not independent of respondent or survey characteristics, then simply expelling protesters from surveys can lead to sample selection bias. Furthermore, WTP estimates will not be comparable across surveys. This paper seeks to explore potential causes of protest behaviour through a meta-study based on data from 40 different surveys. The objective of the study is to examine the effect of respondent specific variables as well as survey specific variables on protest behaviour. Our results suggest that some of the differences in WTP typically observed between different demographic groups, different elicitation formats and different question formats might actually be attributed to inherent differences in the propensity to protest. Our results indicate that the propensity for respondents to exhibit protest behaviour when asked a stated preference type valuation question depends on a number of specific factors, respondent specific as well as survey specific – knowledge which could potentially be used in order to reduce protest behaviour.",
author = "J{\"u}rgen Meyerhoff and Morten M{\o}rkbak and Olsen, {S{\o}ren B{\o}ye}",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
note = "European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, EAERE ; Conference date: 27-06-2012 Through 30-06-2012",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys

AU - Meyerhoff, Jürgen

AU - Mørkbak, Morten

AU - Olsen, Søren Bøye

N1 - Conference code: 19

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - It is well known that some percentage of respondents participating in Stated Preference surveys will not give responses that reflect their true preferences. One reason is protest behaviour. If the distribution of protest responses is not independent of respondent or survey characteristics, then simply expelling protesters from surveys can lead to sample selection bias. Furthermore, WTP estimates will not be comparable across surveys. This paper seeks to explore potential causes of protest behaviour through a meta-study based on data from 40 different surveys. The objective of the study is to examine the effect of respondent specific variables as well as survey specific variables on protest behaviour. Our results suggest that some of the differences in WTP typically observed between different demographic groups, different elicitation formats and different question formats might actually be attributed to inherent differences in the propensity to protest. Our results indicate that the propensity for respondents to exhibit protest behaviour when asked a stated preference type valuation question depends on a number of specific factors, respondent specific as well as survey specific – knowledge which could potentially be used in order to reduce protest behaviour.

AB - It is well known that some percentage of respondents participating in Stated Preference surveys will not give responses that reflect their true preferences. One reason is protest behaviour. If the distribution of protest responses is not independent of respondent or survey characteristics, then simply expelling protesters from surveys can lead to sample selection bias. Furthermore, WTP estimates will not be comparable across surveys. This paper seeks to explore potential causes of protest behaviour through a meta-study based on data from 40 different surveys. The objective of the study is to examine the effect of respondent specific variables as well as survey specific variables on protest behaviour. Our results suggest that some of the differences in WTP typically observed between different demographic groups, different elicitation formats and different question formats might actually be attributed to inherent differences in the propensity to protest. Our results indicate that the propensity for respondents to exhibit protest behaviour when asked a stated preference type valuation question depends on a number of specific factors, respondent specific as well as survey specific – knowledge which could potentially be used in order to reduce protest behaviour.

M3 - Paper

T2 - European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

Y2 - 27 June 2012 through 30 June 2012

ER -

ID: 47934086