A Global Human Rights Approach to Medical Artificial Intelligence

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Standard

A Global Human Rights Approach to Medical Artificial Intelligence. / Lebret, Audrey.

AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance and Privacy in Healthcare. ed. / Marcelo Corrales; Michael Lowery Wilson; Mark Fenwick; Nikolaus Forgó; Till Bärnighausen. Cambridge University Press, 2022. p. 277 - 308 (Cambridge Bioethics and Law ).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lebret, A 2022, A Global Human Rights Approach to Medical Artificial Intelligence. in M Corrales, M Lowery Wilson, M Fenwick, N Forgó & T Bärnighausen (eds), AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance and Privacy in Healthcare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Bioethics and Law , pp. 277 - 308. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921923.015

APA

Lebret, A. (2022). A Global Human Rights Approach to Medical Artificial Intelligence. In M. Corrales, M. Lowery Wilson, M. Fenwick, N. Forgó, & T. Bärnighausen (Eds.), AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance and Privacy in Healthcare (pp. 277 - 308). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Bioethics and Law https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921923.015

Vancouver

Lebret A. A Global Human Rights Approach to Medical Artificial Intelligence. In Corrales M, Lowery Wilson M, Fenwick M, Forgó N, Bärnighausen T, editors, AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance and Privacy in Healthcare. Cambridge University Press. 2022. p. 277 - 308. (Cambridge Bioethics and Law ). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921923.015

Author

Lebret, Audrey. / A Global Human Rights Approach to Medical Artificial Intelligence. AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance and Privacy in Healthcare. editor / Marcelo Corrales ; Michael Lowery Wilson ; Mark Fenwick ; Nikolaus Forgó ; Till Bärnighausen. Cambridge University Press, 2022. pp. 277 - 308 (Cambridge Bioethics and Law ).

Bibtex

@inbook{0e0ef270b5f54f33b589296f4ca4070d,
title = "A Global Human Rights Approach to Medical Artificial Intelligence",
abstract = "The use and development of algorithms in health care, including machine learning, contributes to the discovery of better treatments for patients and offers promising perspectives in the fight against cancer and other diseases. Yet, algorithms are not a neutral health product since they are programmed by humans, with the risk of propagating human rights infringements. In the medical area, human rights impact assessments need to be conducted for applications involving AI. Apart from offering a consistent and transversal substantive approach to AI, human rights law, and in particular the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, would allow the targeting of all stakeholders, including the corporations developing health care algorithms. Such an approach would establish a chain of duties and responsibilities bringing more transparency and consistency in the overall process of developing AI and its later uses. Although this approach would not solve all AI challenges, it would offer a framework for discussion with all relevant actors, including vulnerable populations. An increase in human rights education of medical doctors and data scientists, and further collaboration at the initial stages of algorithm development would greatly contribute to the creation of a human rights culture in the techno-science space.",
author = "Audrey Lebret",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1017/9781108921923.015",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781108830966",
series = "Cambridge Bioethics and Law ",
pages = "277 -- 308",
editor = "Marcelo Corrales and {Lowery Wilson}, Michael and Mark Fenwick and Nikolaus Forg{\'o} and B{\"a}rnighausen, {Till }",
booktitle = "AI in eHealth",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - A Global Human Rights Approach to Medical Artificial Intelligence

AU - Lebret, Audrey

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The use and development of algorithms in health care, including machine learning, contributes to the discovery of better treatments for patients and offers promising perspectives in the fight against cancer and other diseases. Yet, algorithms are not a neutral health product since they are programmed by humans, with the risk of propagating human rights infringements. In the medical area, human rights impact assessments need to be conducted for applications involving AI. Apart from offering a consistent and transversal substantive approach to AI, human rights law, and in particular the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, would allow the targeting of all stakeholders, including the corporations developing health care algorithms. Such an approach would establish a chain of duties and responsibilities bringing more transparency and consistency in the overall process of developing AI and its later uses. Although this approach would not solve all AI challenges, it would offer a framework for discussion with all relevant actors, including vulnerable populations. An increase in human rights education of medical doctors and data scientists, and further collaboration at the initial stages of algorithm development would greatly contribute to the creation of a human rights culture in the techno-science space.

AB - The use and development of algorithms in health care, including machine learning, contributes to the discovery of better treatments for patients and offers promising perspectives in the fight against cancer and other diseases. Yet, algorithms are not a neutral health product since they are programmed by humans, with the risk of propagating human rights infringements. In the medical area, human rights impact assessments need to be conducted for applications involving AI. Apart from offering a consistent and transversal substantive approach to AI, human rights law, and in particular the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, would allow the targeting of all stakeholders, including the corporations developing health care algorithms. Such an approach would establish a chain of duties and responsibilities bringing more transparency and consistency in the overall process of developing AI and its later uses. Although this approach would not solve all AI challenges, it would offer a framework for discussion with all relevant actors, including vulnerable populations. An increase in human rights education of medical doctors and data scientists, and further collaboration at the initial stages of algorithm development would greatly contribute to the creation of a human rights culture in the techno-science space.

U2 - 10.1017/9781108921923.015

DO - 10.1017/9781108921923.015

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781108830966

T3 - Cambridge Bioethics and Law

SP - 277

EP - 308

BT - AI in eHealth

A2 - Corrales, Marcelo

A2 - Lowery Wilson, Michael

A2 - Fenwick, Mark

A2 - Forgó, Nikolaus

A2 - Bärnighausen, Till

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

ID: 308752818