"Негативный эффект" арбитражного соглашения: тенденции российской судебной практики в 2014 г. (The “Negative” Effect of an Arbitration Agreement: Trends in Russian Judicial Practice in 2014)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

"Негативный эффект" арбитражного соглашения: тенденции российской судебной практики в 2014 г. (The “Negative” Effect of an Arbitration Agreement: Trends in Russian Judicial Practice in 2014). / Usoskin, Sergey; Usynin, Maxim.

In: Вестник международного коммерческого арбитража [International Commercial Arbitration Review], Vol. 2, No. 9, 12.2014, p. 30-41.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Usoskin, S & Usynin, M 2014, '"Негативный эффект" арбитражного соглашения: тенденции российской судебной практики в 2014 г. (The “Negative” Effect of an Arbitration Agreement: Trends in Russian Judicial Practice in 2014)', Вестник международного коммерческого арбитража [International Commercial Arbitration Review], vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 30-41. <http://arbitrationreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/N2-2014.pdf>

APA

Usoskin, S., & Usynin, M. (2014). "Негативный эффект" арбитражного соглашения: тенденции российской судебной практики в 2014 г. (The “Negative” Effect of an Arbitration Agreement: Trends in Russian Judicial Practice in 2014). Вестник международного коммерческого арбитража [International Commercial Arbitration Review], 2(9), 30-41. http://arbitrationreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/N2-2014.pdf

Vancouver

Usoskin S, Usynin M. "Негативный эффект" арбитражного соглашения: тенденции российской судебной практики в 2014 г. (The “Negative” Effect of an Arbitration Agreement: Trends in Russian Judicial Practice in 2014). Вестник международного коммерческого арбитража [International Commercial Arbitration Review]. 2014 Dec;2(9):30-41.

Author

Usoskin, Sergey ; Usynin, Maxim. / "Негативный эффект" арбитражного соглашения: тенденции российской судебной практики в 2014 г. (The “Negative” Effect of an Arbitration Agreement: Trends in Russian Judicial Practice in 2014). In: Вестник международного коммерческого арбитража [International Commercial Arbitration Review]. 2014 ; Vol. 2, No. 9. pp. 30-41.

Bibtex

@article{d3b7cbe40b8443e28b10ee2736d4a9c0,
title = "{"}Негативный эффект{"} арбитражного соглашения: тенденции российской судебной практики в 2014 г. (The “Negative” Effect of an Arbitration Agreement: Trends in Russian Judicial Practice in 2014)",
abstract = "On the basis of Russian court decisions rendered in 2014 the authors analyze Russian judicial practice regarding the two most important issues relating to the negative effect of an arbitration agreement: assessment of the validity and enforceability of an arbitration agreement by a state court when deciding on the issue of whether a statement of claim should be left without consideration and determination of the moment before which a party relying on an arbitration agreement may request a court to leave a statement of claim without consideration.",
author = "Sergey Usoskin and Maxim Usynin",
year = "2014",
month = dec,
language = "Russisk",
volume = "2",
pages = "30--41",
journal = "Вестник международного коммерческого арбитража [International Commercial Arbitration Review]",
issn = "2075-1931",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Негативный эффект" арбитражного соглашения: тенденции российской судебной практики в 2014 г. (The “Negative” Effect of an Arbitration Agreement: Trends in Russian Judicial Practice in 2014)

AU - Usoskin, Sergey

AU - Usynin, Maxim

PY - 2014/12

Y1 - 2014/12

N2 - On the basis of Russian court decisions rendered in 2014 the authors analyze Russian judicial practice regarding the two most important issues relating to the negative effect of an arbitration agreement: assessment of the validity and enforceability of an arbitration agreement by a state court when deciding on the issue of whether a statement of claim should be left without consideration and determination of the moment before which a party relying on an arbitration agreement may request a court to leave a statement of claim without consideration.

AB - On the basis of Russian court decisions rendered in 2014 the authors analyze Russian judicial practice regarding the two most important issues relating to the negative effect of an arbitration agreement: assessment of the validity and enforceability of an arbitration agreement by a state court when deciding on the issue of whether a statement of claim should be left without consideration and determination of the moment before which a party relying on an arbitration agreement may request a court to leave a statement of claim without consideration.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 2

SP - 30

EP - 41

JO - Вестник международного коммерческого арбитража [International Commercial Arbitration Review]

JF - Вестник международного коммерческого арбитража [International Commercial Arbitration Review]

SN - 2075-1931

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 233844953