Mathias Møllebæk
Postdoc
Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science
Universitetsparken 2, 2100 København Ø, 10 Universitetsparken 2, Building: 10-2-267
Member of:
I study rhetorical, political and sociological aspects of medical information artifacts that address regulatory, clinical and/or non-technical publics, such as medicine risk advisories, clinical guidelines and public hearings.
Qualitative methods
I work with qualitative and text-oriented methods such as
- Document analysis
- Rhetorical analysis and criticism
- Semi-structured interviews
- Focus group interviews
- Protocol analysis
Current research
PhD project: Improving medicine risk communication to general practitioners
Every day general practioners receive all kinds of new information about new medicines and new research. But what do they need in their everyday practice in front of their patients? How can we secure that they receive vital information about newly discovered medicine risk? Normally physicians and HCPs receive this kind of information in a letter. But that mode of communication in not very beneficial to physicians nor patients.
For those reasons this project sets out to understand how general practitioners prefer receiving this information and what is important for them to know about medicine. With this knowledge future communications may better support the decisions they make when prescribing medicine.
ID: 170489612
Most downloads
-
22
downloads
Regulating Patient Access to Therapeutics in Denmark: a Rhetorical Analysis of Welfare Imaginaries in Public Controversy
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Published -
21
downloads
Are Drug Safety Advisories Compatible with Physicians’ Information Behavior? Semi-Structured Interviews with General Practitioners about Direct to Healthcare Professional Communication
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Published -
11
downloads
Mod en hverdagsetik for lægemiddelbrug: Towards an everyday ethics for medicines use: About people, medicines and multiplicity
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Published