The Construction of the League of Nations Secretariat. Formative Practices of Autonomy and Legitimacy in International Organizations

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Construction of the League of Nations Secretariat. Formative Practices of Autonomy and Legitimacy in International Organizations. / Gram-Skjoldager, Karen ; Ikonomou, Haakon Andreas.

In: The International History Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2019, p. 257-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Gram-Skjoldager, K & Ikonomou, HA 2019, 'The Construction of the League of Nations Secretariat. Formative Practices of Autonomy and Legitimacy in International Organizations', The International History Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2017.1409792

APA

Gram-Skjoldager, K., & Ikonomou, H. A. (2019). The Construction of the League of Nations Secretariat. Formative Practices of Autonomy and Legitimacy in International Organizations. The International History Review, 41(2), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2017.1409792

Vancouver

Gram-Skjoldager K, Ikonomou HA. The Construction of the League of Nations Secretariat. Formative Practices of Autonomy and Legitimacy in International Organizations. The International History Review. 2019;41(2):257-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2017.1409792

Author

Gram-Skjoldager, Karen ; Ikonomou, Haakon Andreas. / The Construction of the League of Nations Secretariat. Formative Practices of Autonomy and Legitimacy in International Organizations. In: The International History Review. 2019 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 257-279.

Bibtex

@article{206fe8f1d258415984ac7fed03a04b46,
title = "The Construction of the League of Nations Secretariat. Formative Practices of Autonomy and Legitimacy in International Organizations",
abstract = "This article investigates the formative staffing practices of the League of Nations Secretariat. Drawing on the social theory of Pierre Bourdieu, it argues that core traits of the League's institutional capacity and identity was produced through the institutionalization of recruitment practices in the League's formative years from 1919 to 1923. Through an exploration of early negotiations and practices of staffing, we show how the League built and balanced legitimacy, by combining a clearly international make-up of the League Secretariat with acute sensitivity to state interests, and autonomy, by defending the Secretary-General's exclusive prerogative of staffing, in a way that has been defining for the trajectory of international organizations (IOs) until today. The article thus turns to the institutional landscape where the individual and its surroundings meet: through the daily staffing practices of the Secretariat, it explores how an institution came to be, function and assert its influence as an autonomous and legitimate diplomatic agent in a broader international field. As such, the article, as an innovative contribution to the field, argues that international historians should connect thorough institutional investigations with elements of the {\textquoteleft}cultural turn{\textquoteright} in International History, in order to properly engage with and understand IOs as diplomatic actors.",
author = "Karen Gram-Skjoldager and Ikonomou, {Haakon Andreas}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/07075332.2017.1409792",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "257--279",
journal = "The International History Review",
issn = "0707-5332",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Construction of the League of Nations Secretariat. Formative Practices of Autonomy and Legitimacy in International Organizations

AU - Gram-Skjoldager, Karen

AU - Ikonomou, Haakon Andreas

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article investigates the formative staffing practices of the League of Nations Secretariat. Drawing on the social theory of Pierre Bourdieu, it argues that core traits of the League's institutional capacity and identity was produced through the institutionalization of recruitment practices in the League's formative years from 1919 to 1923. Through an exploration of early negotiations and practices of staffing, we show how the League built and balanced legitimacy, by combining a clearly international make-up of the League Secretariat with acute sensitivity to state interests, and autonomy, by defending the Secretary-General's exclusive prerogative of staffing, in a way that has been defining for the trajectory of international organizations (IOs) until today. The article thus turns to the institutional landscape where the individual and its surroundings meet: through the daily staffing practices of the Secretariat, it explores how an institution came to be, function and assert its influence as an autonomous and legitimate diplomatic agent in a broader international field. As such, the article, as an innovative contribution to the field, argues that international historians should connect thorough institutional investigations with elements of the ‘cultural turn’ in International History, in order to properly engage with and understand IOs as diplomatic actors.

AB - This article investigates the formative staffing practices of the League of Nations Secretariat. Drawing on the social theory of Pierre Bourdieu, it argues that core traits of the League's institutional capacity and identity was produced through the institutionalization of recruitment practices in the League's formative years from 1919 to 1923. Through an exploration of early negotiations and practices of staffing, we show how the League built and balanced legitimacy, by combining a clearly international make-up of the League Secretariat with acute sensitivity to state interests, and autonomy, by defending the Secretary-General's exclusive prerogative of staffing, in a way that has been defining for the trajectory of international organizations (IOs) until today. The article thus turns to the institutional landscape where the individual and its surroundings meet: through the daily staffing practices of the Secretariat, it explores how an institution came to be, function and assert its influence as an autonomous and legitimate diplomatic agent in a broader international field. As such, the article, as an innovative contribution to the field, argues that international historians should connect thorough institutional investigations with elements of the ‘cultural turn’ in International History, in order to properly engage with and understand IOs as diplomatic actors.

U2 - 10.1080/07075332.2017.1409792

DO - 10.1080/07075332.2017.1409792

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 257

EP - 279

JO - The International History Review

JF - The International History Review

SN - 0707-5332

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 212732605