Hvorfor siger russerne og, når danskerne siger eller? Dansk logik versus russisk logik

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review

Standard

Hvorfor siger russerne og, når danskerne siger eller? Dansk logik versus russisk logik. / Lorentzen, Elena.

In: Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, Vol. Special issue 1, 30.05.2016, p. 74-86.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Lorentzen, E 2016, 'Hvorfor siger russerne og, når danskerne siger eller? Dansk logik versus russisk logik', Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, vol. Special issue 1, pp. 74-86.

APA

Lorentzen, E. (2016). Hvorfor siger russerne og, når danskerne siger eller? Dansk logik versus russisk logik. Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, Special issue 1, 74-86.

Vancouver

Lorentzen E. Hvorfor siger russerne og, når danskerne siger eller? Dansk logik versus russisk logik. Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication. 2016 May 30;Special issue 1:74-86.

Author

Lorentzen, Elena. / Hvorfor siger russerne og, når danskerne siger eller? Dansk logik versus russisk logik. In: Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication. 2016 ; Vol. Special issue 1. pp. 74-86.

Bibtex

@article{9f6d44836bd84c9195c8a168cf2a6fff,
title = "Hvorfor siger russerne og, n{\aa}r danskerne siger eller? Dansk logik versus russisk logik",
abstract = "In this paper, I propose a new approach to phrasal coordination in general and disjunction in particular based on Durst-Andersen{\textquoteright}s cognitive-semiotic theory of linguistic supertypes, according to which Russian is a reality-oriented language with a third-person-oriented speaker and Danish is a hearer-oriented language with a second-person-oriented speaker. I claim that the use of conjunction and disjunction in these languages is determined by their essential properties as two different super- types, viz. by the ground-situational nature of linguistic structures in Russian, the grammar of which functions as a model of situations in reality, and by the ground-propositional nature of linguistic structures in Danish, the grammar of which functions as a signal to the hearer to find situations behind the speaker{\textquoteright}s information.",
author = "Elena Lorentzen",
note = "ISBN: 978-87-7112-247-3",
year = "2016",
month = may,
day = "30",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "Special issue 1",
pages = "74--86",
journal = "Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication",
issn = "2246-8838",
publisher = "Aalborg Universitetsforlag ",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hvorfor siger russerne og, når danskerne siger eller? Dansk logik versus russisk logik

AU - Lorentzen, Elena

N1 - ISBN: 978-87-7112-247-3

PY - 2016/5/30

Y1 - 2016/5/30

N2 - In this paper, I propose a new approach to phrasal coordination in general and disjunction in particular based on Durst-Andersen’s cognitive-semiotic theory of linguistic supertypes, according to which Russian is a reality-oriented language with a third-person-oriented speaker and Danish is a hearer-oriented language with a second-person-oriented speaker. I claim that the use of conjunction and disjunction in these languages is determined by their essential properties as two different super- types, viz. by the ground-situational nature of linguistic structures in Russian, the grammar of which functions as a model of situations in reality, and by the ground-propositional nature of linguistic structures in Danish, the grammar of which functions as a signal to the hearer to find situations behind the speaker’s information.

AB - In this paper, I propose a new approach to phrasal coordination in general and disjunction in particular based on Durst-Andersen’s cognitive-semiotic theory of linguistic supertypes, according to which Russian is a reality-oriented language with a third-person-oriented speaker and Danish is a hearer-oriented language with a second-person-oriented speaker. I claim that the use of conjunction and disjunction in these languages is determined by their essential properties as two different super- types, viz. by the ground-situational nature of linguistic structures in Russian, the grammar of which functions as a model of situations in reality, and by the ground-propositional nature of linguistic structures in Danish, the grammar of which functions as a signal to the hearer to find situations behind the speaker’s information.

UR - https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/globe/issue/view/142

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - Special issue 1

SP - 74

EP - 86

JO - Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication

JF - Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication

SN - 2246-8838

ER -

ID: 161912110