Environmental impacts of combining pig slurry acidification and separation under different regulatory regimes - a life cycle assessment
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Environmental impacts of combining pig slurry acidification and separation under different regulatory regimes - a life cycle assessment. / ten Hoeve, Marieke; Gomez Muñoz, Beatriz; Jensen, Lars Stoumann; Bruun, Sander.
In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 181, 2016, p. 710-720.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental impacts of combining pig slurry acidification and separation under different regulatory regimes - a life cycle assessment
AU - ten Hoeve, Marieke
AU - Gomez Muñoz, Beatriz
AU - Jensen, Lars Stoumann
AU - Bruun, Sander
N1 - Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Global livestock production is increasing rapidly, leading to larger amounts of manure and environmental impacts. Technologies that can be applied to treat manure in order to decrease certain environmental impacts include separation and acidification. In this study, a life cycle assessment was used to investigate the environmental effects of slurry acidification and separation, and whether there were synergetic environmental benefits to combining these technologies. Furthermore, an analysis was undertaken into the effect of implementing regulations restricting the P application rate to soils on the environmental impacts of the technologies. The impact categories analysed were climate change, terrestrial, marine and freshwater eutrophication, fossil resource depletion and toxicity potential. In-house slurry acidification appeared to be the most beneficial scenario under both N and P regulations. Slurry separation led to a lower freshwater eutrophication potential than the other scenarios in which N regulations alone were in force, while these environmental benefits disappeared after implementation of stricter P regulations. With N regulations alone, there was a synergetic positive effect of combining in-house acidification and separation on marine eutrophication potential compared to these technologies individually. The model was sensitive to the chosen ammonia emission coefficients and to the choice of inclusion of indirect nitrous oxide emissions, since scenarios changed ranking for certain impact categories.
AB - Global livestock production is increasing rapidly, leading to larger amounts of manure and environmental impacts. Technologies that can be applied to treat manure in order to decrease certain environmental impacts include separation and acidification. In this study, a life cycle assessment was used to investigate the environmental effects of slurry acidification and separation, and whether there were synergetic environmental benefits to combining these technologies. Furthermore, an analysis was undertaken into the effect of implementing regulations restricting the P application rate to soils on the environmental impacts of the technologies. The impact categories analysed were climate change, terrestrial, marine and freshwater eutrophication, fossil resource depletion and toxicity potential. In-house slurry acidification appeared to be the most beneficial scenario under both N and P regulations. Slurry separation led to a lower freshwater eutrophication potential than the other scenarios in which N regulations alone were in force, while these environmental benefits disappeared after implementation of stricter P regulations. With N regulations alone, there was a synergetic positive effect of combining in-house acidification and separation on marine eutrophication potential compared to these technologies individually. The model was sensitive to the chosen ammonia emission coefficients and to the choice of inclusion of indirect nitrous oxide emissions, since scenarios changed ranking for certain impact categories.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.028
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.028
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27566935
VL - 181
SP - 710
EP - 720
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
SN - 0301-4797
ER -
ID: 169133229