Do general practitioners know patients' preferences? an empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Do general practitioners know patients' preferences? an empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment. / Pedersen, Line Bjornskov; Kjær, Trine; Kragstrup, Jakob; Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte.
In: Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 3, 05.2012, p. 514-523.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Do general practitioners know patients' preferences? an empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment
AU - Pedersen, Line Bjornskov
AU - Kjær, Trine
AU - Kragstrup, Jakob
AU - Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Objectives: This study investigated whether general practitioners (GPs) know patients' preferences regarding a number of organizational characteristics in general practice (i.e., waiting time on the telephone, opening hours, waiting time to the appointment, distance to the general practice, waiting time in the waiting room, consultation time, and whether the GP or assisting personnel performs routine tasks) to examine whether there is a basis for improving the agency relationship at an aggregate level. Data: A total of 698 respondents from the Danish population and 969 GPs answered the questionnaire in May and September 2010. Methods: In a discrete choice experiment, GPs and patients made both forced and unforced choices, allowing us to explore the congruence of preferences 1) when patients must choose a new GP and 2) when they can stay with their current GP. Results: Results show that in the forced choice, preferences are seen to differ. In the unforced choice also, preferences differ - mainly because GPs overestimate their own importance to the patients. Rank orders, however, are similar for both GPs and patients. Conclusions: It is concluded that GPs do not have a precise knowledge of patients' preferences. However, in the unforced choice, GPs do know on which attributes to compete although they underestimate the necessity of competition. The overall conclusion is that there is room for improving the agency relationship in the organization of general practice.
AB - Objectives: This study investigated whether general practitioners (GPs) know patients' preferences regarding a number of organizational characteristics in general practice (i.e., waiting time on the telephone, opening hours, waiting time to the appointment, distance to the general practice, waiting time in the waiting room, consultation time, and whether the GP or assisting personnel performs routine tasks) to examine whether there is a basis for improving the agency relationship at an aggregate level. Data: A total of 698 respondents from the Danish population and 969 GPs answered the questionnaire in May and September 2010. Methods: In a discrete choice experiment, GPs and patients made both forced and unforced choices, allowing us to explore the congruence of preferences 1) when patients must choose a new GP and 2) when they can stay with their current GP. Results: Results show that in the forced choice, preferences are seen to differ. In the unforced choice also, preferences differ - mainly because GPs overestimate their own importance to the patients. Rank orders, however, are similar for both GPs and patients. Conclusions: It is concluded that GPs do not have a precise knowledge of patients' preferences. However, in the unforced choice, GPs do know on which attributes to compete although they underestimate the necessity of competition. The overall conclusion is that there is room for improving the agency relationship in the organization of general practice.
KW - discrete choice experiment
KW - general practice
KW - organization
KW - principal-agent relationship
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861177580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.002
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 22583462
AN - SCOPUS:84861177580
VL - 15
SP - 514
EP - 523
JO - Value in Health
JF - Value in Health
SN - 1098-3015
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 324138287