The Effect of Anti-Rosetting Agents against Malaria Parasites under Physiological Flow Conditions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Effect of Anti-Rosetting Agents against Malaria Parasites under Physiological Flow Conditions. / Adams, Yvonne; Rowe, J. Alexandra.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 9, e73999, 16.09.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Adams, Y & Rowe, JA 2013, 'The Effect of Anti-Rosetting Agents against Malaria Parasites under Physiological Flow Conditions', PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, e73999. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073999

APA

Adams, Y., & Rowe, J. A. (2013). The Effect of Anti-Rosetting Agents against Malaria Parasites under Physiological Flow Conditions. PLoS ONE, 8(9), [e73999]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073999

Vancouver

Adams Y, Rowe JA. The Effect of Anti-Rosetting Agents against Malaria Parasites under Physiological Flow Conditions. PLoS ONE. 2013 Sep 16;8(9). e73999. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073999

Author

Adams, Yvonne ; Rowe, J. Alexandra. / The Effect of Anti-Rosetting Agents against Malaria Parasites under Physiological Flow Conditions. In: PLoS ONE. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 9.

Bibtex

@article{dee6abd1d9314bfaa5892c546fd47561,
title = "The Effect of Anti-Rosetting Agents against Malaria Parasites under Physiological Flow Conditions",
abstract = "Rosetting remains the dominant malaria parasite adhesion phenotype associated with severe disease and pathogenicity in Africa. The formation of rosettes, whereby a Plasmodium falciparum infected erythrocyte (IE) adheres to two or more non-IEs, is thought to facilitate the occlusion of microvascular blood vessels by adhering to host endothelial cells and other bound IEs. Current methods of determining the rosette-disrupting capabilities of antibodies/drugs have focused on static assays. As IEs in vivo are exposed to shear stresses within the microvasculature, the effect of flow conditions on rosetting requires further examination. This study establishes a new rosetting flow assay using a closed perfusion system together with inverted fluorescence microscopy and image analysis, and confirms previous reports that rosettes exist under shear stresses equivalent to those present in the microvasculature (0.5-1.0 dyn/cm2). Furthermore, we tested the effectiveness of rosette-disrupting PfEMP1 antibodies, heparin and fucoidan over a range of concentrations on two P. falciparum strains, and found no statistically significant differences between the results of static and flow assays. The new flow assay is a valuable addition to the tools available to study rosetting. However, the static assay has good predictive value and remains useful as the standard screening test for rosette-disrupting interventions.",
author = "Yvonne Adams and Rowe, {J. Alexandra}",
year = "2013",
month = sep,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0073999",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effect of Anti-Rosetting Agents against Malaria Parasites under Physiological Flow Conditions

AU - Adams, Yvonne

AU - Rowe, J. Alexandra

PY - 2013/9/16

Y1 - 2013/9/16

N2 - Rosetting remains the dominant malaria parasite adhesion phenotype associated with severe disease and pathogenicity in Africa. The formation of rosettes, whereby a Plasmodium falciparum infected erythrocyte (IE) adheres to two or more non-IEs, is thought to facilitate the occlusion of microvascular blood vessels by adhering to host endothelial cells and other bound IEs. Current methods of determining the rosette-disrupting capabilities of antibodies/drugs have focused on static assays. As IEs in vivo are exposed to shear stresses within the microvasculature, the effect of flow conditions on rosetting requires further examination. This study establishes a new rosetting flow assay using a closed perfusion system together with inverted fluorescence microscopy and image analysis, and confirms previous reports that rosettes exist under shear stresses equivalent to those present in the microvasculature (0.5-1.0 dyn/cm2). Furthermore, we tested the effectiveness of rosette-disrupting PfEMP1 antibodies, heparin and fucoidan over a range of concentrations on two P. falciparum strains, and found no statistically significant differences between the results of static and flow assays. The new flow assay is a valuable addition to the tools available to study rosetting. However, the static assay has good predictive value and remains useful as the standard screening test for rosette-disrupting interventions.

AB - Rosetting remains the dominant malaria parasite adhesion phenotype associated with severe disease and pathogenicity in Africa. The formation of rosettes, whereby a Plasmodium falciparum infected erythrocyte (IE) adheres to two or more non-IEs, is thought to facilitate the occlusion of microvascular blood vessels by adhering to host endothelial cells and other bound IEs. Current methods of determining the rosette-disrupting capabilities of antibodies/drugs have focused on static assays. As IEs in vivo are exposed to shear stresses within the microvasculature, the effect of flow conditions on rosetting requires further examination. This study establishes a new rosetting flow assay using a closed perfusion system together with inverted fluorescence microscopy and image analysis, and confirms previous reports that rosettes exist under shear stresses equivalent to those present in the microvasculature (0.5-1.0 dyn/cm2). Furthermore, we tested the effectiveness of rosette-disrupting PfEMP1 antibodies, heparin and fucoidan over a range of concentrations on two P. falciparum strains, and found no statistically significant differences between the results of static and flow assays. The new flow assay is a valuable addition to the tools available to study rosetting. However, the static assay has good predictive value and remains useful as the standard screening test for rosette-disrupting interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884198034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0073999

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0073999

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24066091

AN - SCOPUS:84884198034

VL - 8

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 9

M1 - e73999

ER -

ID: 340559509