Steady-state kinetics and dynamics of morphine in cancer patients: is sedation related to the absorption rate of morphine?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Steady-state kinetics and dynamics of morphine in cancer patients : is sedation related to the absorption rate of morphine? / Christrup, Lona Louring; Sjøgren, P; Jensen, N H; Banning, A M; Elbaek, K; Ersbøll, A K.
In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 18, No. 3, 09.1999, p. 164-73.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Steady-state kinetics and dynamics of morphine in cancer patients
T2 - is sedation related to the absorption rate of morphine?
AU - Christrup, Lona Louring
AU - Sjøgren, P
AU - Jensen, N H
AU - Banning, A M
AU - Elbaek, K
AU - Ersbøll, A K
PY - 1999/9
Y1 - 1999/9
N2 - Eighteen patients suffering from chronic pain due to cancer completed a balanced, double-blind, double-dummy, two period cross-over trial comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of morphine and its metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, after administration of morphine given as controlled-release (CR) tablets (every 12 h) and immediate-release (IR) tablets (every 6 h). The same total daily dose of morphine was given in both study periods. Patients received both test formulations for 4 days and on the final day of each period, peripheral venous blood samples for analysis of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine-6-glucuronide were obtained. Pain intensity, sedation, and continuous reaction time (CRT) were assessed. No significant differences could be demonstrated in AUC/dose, Cmin, Cmax or fluctuation index values between the two treatments (IR and CR tablets) for either morphine or its metabolites. Tmax for morphine and its metabolites occurred significantly later after administration of CR tablets than after administration of IR tablets. There were no significant differences between the IR and the CR formulation with respect to analgesia and side effects, and there was no difference in the patients' overall impression of the two treatments. More important, there was no difference between the Tmax and the time to peak sedation after administration of IR tablets (P = 0.63). However, due to the relatively small number of patients and the variability in the data, the statistical power of the test was only 0.074. The risk of a type II error is 0.926. These data demonstrate the PK and PD similarities and differences between CR and IR morphine. They suggest that there may be a relationship between Tmax (determined by absorption rate) and sedation, but further evaluation of this potential relationship is needed.
AB - Eighteen patients suffering from chronic pain due to cancer completed a balanced, double-blind, double-dummy, two period cross-over trial comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of morphine and its metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, after administration of morphine given as controlled-release (CR) tablets (every 12 h) and immediate-release (IR) tablets (every 6 h). The same total daily dose of morphine was given in both study periods. Patients received both test formulations for 4 days and on the final day of each period, peripheral venous blood samples for analysis of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine-6-glucuronide were obtained. Pain intensity, sedation, and continuous reaction time (CRT) were assessed. No significant differences could be demonstrated in AUC/dose, Cmin, Cmax or fluctuation index values between the two treatments (IR and CR tablets) for either morphine or its metabolites. Tmax for morphine and its metabolites occurred significantly later after administration of CR tablets than after administration of IR tablets. There were no significant differences between the IR and the CR formulation with respect to analgesia and side effects, and there was no difference in the patients' overall impression of the two treatments. More important, there was no difference between the Tmax and the time to peak sedation after administration of IR tablets (P = 0.63). However, due to the relatively small number of patients and the variability in the data, the statistical power of the test was only 0.074. The risk of a type II error is 0.926. These data demonstrate the PK and PD similarities and differences between CR and IR morphine. They suggest that there may be a relationship between Tmax (determined by absorption rate) and sedation, but further evaluation of this potential relationship is needed.
KW - Aged
KW - Analgesics, Opioid
KW - Biotransformation
KW - Cross-Over Studies
KW - Double-Blind Method
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Hypnotics and Sedatives
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Morphine
KW - Neoplasms
KW - Pain, Intractable
KW - Tablets
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 10517037
VL - 18
SP - 164
EP - 173
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
SN - 0885-3924
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 46099373