Sovereign dealings with blasphemy: The prosecution of written pacts with the Devil within the absolute monarchy of Denmark-Norway
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Sovereign dealings with blasphemy : The prosecution of written pacts with the Devil within the absolute monarchy of Denmark-Norway. / Nissen, Nanna Eva.
In: Scandinavian Journal of History, Vol. 47, No. 4, 16.03.2022, p. 464-489.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sovereign dealings with blasphemy
T2 - The prosecution of written pacts with the Devil within the absolute monarchy of Denmark-Norway
AU - Nissen, Nanna Eva
PY - 2022/3/16
Y1 - 2022/3/16
N2 - This article discusses how to perceive developments in the prosecution of written pacts with the Devil in Denmark-Norway between 1634 and 1754. While existing scholarship interprets the prosecution within the framework of an Enlightenment narrative by presenting the cases as evidence of an incomplete rejection of magical beliefs, such as the possibility of making a pact with the Devil, this article investigates the cases with regard to the early absolutist sovereigns’ endeavours to deal with blasphemy offences. The medley of punishments imposed in the cases – including public confession, executions, and imprisonment with hard labour – calls for a more complex evaluation of both ruptures and continuity in the prosecution of this type of crime during the period. Through selected cases representing varying approaches of the respective sovereigns, this article analyses how the understanding and administration of the offence developed in the legal practice of the emerging absolutist state.
AB - This article discusses how to perceive developments in the prosecution of written pacts with the Devil in Denmark-Norway between 1634 and 1754. While existing scholarship interprets the prosecution within the framework of an Enlightenment narrative by presenting the cases as evidence of an incomplete rejection of magical beliefs, such as the possibility of making a pact with the Devil, this article investigates the cases with regard to the early absolutist sovereigns’ endeavours to deal with blasphemy offences. The medley of punishments imposed in the cases – including public confession, executions, and imprisonment with hard labour – calls for a more complex evaluation of both ruptures and continuity in the prosecution of this type of crime during the period. Through selected cases representing varying approaches of the respective sovereigns, this article analyses how the understanding and administration of the offence developed in the legal practice of the emerging absolutist state.
U2 - 10.1080/03468755.2022.2052349
DO - 10.1080/03468755.2022.2052349
M3 - Journal article
VL - 47
SP - 464
EP - 489
JO - Scandinavian Journal of History
JF - Scandinavian Journal of History
SN - 0346-8755
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 300688525