Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction: three-layer skin suture versus staples

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction : three-layer skin suture versus staples. / Gaspar, F J L; Hensler, M; Vester-Glowinski, P V; Jensen, K K.

In: Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Vol. 56, No. 6, 2022, p. 342-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Gaspar, FJL, Hensler, M, Vester-Glowinski, PV & Jensen, KK 2022, 'Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction: three-layer skin suture versus staples', Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 342-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1815754

APA

Gaspar, F. J. L., Hensler, M., Vester-Glowinski, P. V., & Jensen, K. K. (2022). Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction: three-layer skin suture versus staples. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, 56(6), 342-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1815754

Vancouver

Gaspar FJL, Hensler M, Vester-Glowinski PV, Jensen KK. Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction: three-layer skin suture versus staples. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 2022;56(6):342-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1815754

Author

Gaspar, F J L ; Hensler, M ; Vester-Glowinski, P V ; Jensen, K K. / Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction : three-layer skin suture versus staples. In: Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 2022 ; Vol. 56, No. 6. pp. 342-347.

Bibtex

@article{fd47a753fc894d229018bbc3b4be3792,
title = "Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction: three-layer skin suture versus staples",
abstract = "Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) has received little attention, even though these patients have demonstrated insufficient wound healing. This study assessed the postoperative wound-related complications and patient-reported outcomes after skin closure using single- or triple layer closure following AWR. This was a retrospective study at a University Hospital from 2016 to 2018. Patients were grouped into a single-layer cohort (SLC) and a triple-layer cohort (TLC). Skin incisions closed with either technique were compared. Postoperative complications were registered from chart review (SLC: n = 48, TLC: n = 40). Patient reported-outcomes were assessed through the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) and the Hernia Related Quality of Life survey. A total of 51 patients were included (SLC: n = 26, TLC: n = 25). There was no difference in wound complications after single- or triple-layer skin closure; seroma (SLC: 16.7% vs. TLC: 15%, p = 1.00), surgical site infection (SLC: 4.2% vs. TLC: 7.5%, p = .834), hematoma (SLC: 6.2% vs. TLC: 2.5%, p = .744) and wound rupture (SLC: 2.1% vs. TLC: 2.5%, p = 1.00). Patients who had incisions closed using single-layer closure were more satisfied; PSAQ satisfaction with scar symptoms (SLC: 6.7 points (IQR 0.0-18.3) vs. TLC: 26.7 points (IQR 0.0-33.3), p = .039) and scar aesthetics (SLC 25.9 points (IQR 18.5-33.3) vs. TLC: 37.0 (IQR 29.6-44.4), p = .013). There was no difference in 30-day wound complications after either skin closure technique. The results favoured the single-layer closure technique regarding the cosmetic outcome.Abbreviations: AWR: abdominal wall reconstruction; SLC: single-layer cohort; TLC: triple-layer cohort; PSAQ: patient scar assessment questionnaire; IH: incisional hernia; QOL: quality of life; BMI: body mass index; HerQLes: hernia-related quality of life; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; SSO: surgical site occurence; SSI: surgical site infection; LOS: length of stay; RCT: randomized controlled trial.",
keywords = "Humans, Surgical Wound Infection/etiology, Quality of Life, Cicatrix/surgery, Abdominal Wall/surgery, Retrospective Studies, Suture Techniques/adverse effects, Hernia/complications, Sutures/adverse effects",
author = "Gaspar, {F J L} and M Hensler and Vester-Glowinski, {P V} and Jensen, {K K}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/2000656X.2020.1815754",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "342--347",
journal = "Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery",
issn = "2000-656X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction

T2 - three-layer skin suture versus staples

AU - Gaspar, F J L

AU - Hensler, M

AU - Vester-Glowinski, P V

AU - Jensen, K K

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) has received little attention, even though these patients have demonstrated insufficient wound healing. This study assessed the postoperative wound-related complications and patient-reported outcomes after skin closure using single- or triple layer closure following AWR. This was a retrospective study at a University Hospital from 2016 to 2018. Patients were grouped into a single-layer cohort (SLC) and a triple-layer cohort (TLC). Skin incisions closed with either technique were compared. Postoperative complications were registered from chart review (SLC: n = 48, TLC: n = 40). Patient reported-outcomes were assessed through the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) and the Hernia Related Quality of Life survey. A total of 51 patients were included (SLC: n = 26, TLC: n = 25). There was no difference in wound complications after single- or triple-layer skin closure; seroma (SLC: 16.7% vs. TLC: 15%, p = 1.00), surgical site infection (SLC: 4.2% vs. TLC: 7.5%, p = .834), hematoma (SLC: 6.2% vs. TLC: 2.5%, p = .744) and wound rupture (SLC: 2.1% vs. TLC: 2.5%, p = 1.00). Patients who had incisions closed using single-layer closure were more satisfied; PSAQ satisfaction with scar symptoms (SLC: 6.7 points (IQR 0.0-18.3) vs. TLC: 26.7 points (IQR 0.0-33.3), p = .039) and scar aesthetics (SLC 25.9 points (IQR 18.5-33.3) vs. TLC: 37.0 (IQR 29.6-44.4), p = .013). There was no difference in 30-day wound complications after either skin closure technique. The results favoured the single-layer closure technique regarding the cosmetic outcome.Abbreviations: AWR: abdominal wall reconstruction; SLC: single-layer cohort; TLC: triple-layer cohort; PSAQ: patient scar assessment questionnaire; IH: incisional hernia; QOL: quality of life; BMI: body mass index; HerQLes: hernia-related quality of life; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; SSO: surgical site occurence; SSI: surgical site infection; LOS: length of stay; RCT: randomized controlled trial.

AB - Skin closure following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) has received little attention, even though these patients have demonstrated insufficient wound healing. This study assessed the postoperative wound-related complications and patient-reported outcomes after skin closure using single- or triple layer closure following AWR. This was a retrospective study at a University Hospital from 2016 to 2018. Patients were grouped into a single-layer cohort (SLC) and a triple-layer cohort (TLC). Skin incisions closed with either technique were compared. Postoperative complications were registered from chart review (SLC: n = 48, TLC: n = 40). Patient reported-outcomes were assessed through the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) and the Hernia Related Quality of Life survey. A total of 51 patients were included (SLC: n = 26, TLC: n = 25). There was no difference in wound complications after single- or triple-layer skin closure; seroma (SLC: 16.7% vs. TLC: 15%, p = 1.00), surgical site infection (SLC: 4.2% vs. TLC: 7.5%, p = .834), hematoma (SLC: 6.2% vs. TLC: 2.5%, p = .744) and wound rupture (SLC: 2.1% vs. TLC: 2.5%, p = 1.00). Patients who had incisions closed using single-layer closure were more satisfied; PSAQ satisfaction with scar symptoms (SLC: 6.7 points (IQR 0.0-18.3) vs. TLC: 26.7 points (IQR 0.0-33.3), p = .039) and scar aesthetics (SLC 25.9 points (IQR 18.5-33.3) vs. TLC: 37.0 (IQR 29.6-44.4), p = .013). There was no difference in 30-day wound complications after either skin closure technique. The results favoured the single-layer closure technique regarding the cosmetic outcome.Abbreviations: AWR: abdominal wall reconstruction; SLC: single-layer cohort; TLC: triple-layer cohort; PSAQ: patient scar assessment questionnaire; IH: incisional hernia; QOL: quality of life; BMI: body mass index; HerQLes: hernia-related quality of life; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; SSO: surgical site occurence; SSI: surgical site infection; LOS: length of stay; RCT: randomized controlled trial.

KW - Humans

KW - Surgical Wound Infection/etiology

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Cicatrix/surgery

KW - Abdominal Wall/surgery

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Suture Techniques/adverse effects

KW - Hernia/complications

KW - Sutures/adverse effects

U2 - 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1815754

DO - 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1815754

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32940132

VL - 56

SP - 342

EP - 347

JO - Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery

SN - 2000-656X

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 345411125