TY - JOUR

T1 - Single center experience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN™ Valve

AU - Nielsen, Hans Henrik Møller

AU - Thuesen, Leif

AU - Egeblad, Henrik

AU - Poulsen, Steen Hvitfeldt

AU - Klaaborg, Kaj-Erik

AU - Jakobsen, Carl-Johan

AU - Andersen, Henning Rud

AU - Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for high-risk patients was introduced in the early 2000s for treatment of aortic valve stenosis patients with too high surgical risk. During the last years, there has been a dramatic increase in TAVI procedures. TAVI programs are implemented in numerous cardiac centers. This paper describes a single center experience with its first 100 TAVI procedures.METHODS: This study included the first 100 patients who were scheduled for either transfemoral (F-TAVI) or transapical (A-TAVI) aortic valve implantation at Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, using the Edwards SAPIEN™ valve. The indication for TAVI was unacceptable high predicted risk associated with conventional surgery. Patients with adequate diameter of iliac arteries were scheduled for F-TAVI, otherwise A-TAVI was preferred.RESULTS: The patients were treated between February 2006 and June 2010. Of these were 44% males and 56% females with a mean (S.D.) age of 81 (7.0). Thirty-days mortality rate was 8%, and decreased from 12% among the first 50 patients to 4% for the last 50 patients. Successful implantation was achieved in 92% patients. Major non-fatal complications were seen in 5% of 76 A-TAVI and in 0% of 24 F-TAVI patients. Mean (S.D.) EuroSCORE in the F-TAVI and A-TAVI groups was 15.9 (9.4) and 21.5 (14), respectively (p = 0.06). Post-procedural leakage of cardiac biomarkers was significantly higher in the A-TAVI group as compared to in the F-TAVI group. Mean (S.D.) NYHA class improved from 2.9 (0.6) to 1.8 (0.7) p < 0.001, with no significant difference between A-TAVI and F-TAVI patients.CONCLUSION: In surgically non-amenable patients, TAVI can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity and results in marked functional improvement. A decrease in 30-day mortality over time indicated a learning curve when implementing this treatment.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for high-risk patients was introduced in the early 2000s for treatment of aortic valve stenosis patients with too high surgical risk. During the last years, there has been a dramatic increase in TAVI procedures. TAVI programs are implemented in numerous cardiac centers. This paper describes a single center experience with its first 100 TAVI procedures.METHODS: This study included the first 100 patients who were scheduled for either transfemoral (F-TAVI) or transapical (A-TAVI) aortic valve implantation at Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, using the Edwards SAPIEN™ valve. The indication for TAVI was unacceptable high predicted risk associated with conventional surgery. Patients with adequate diameter of iliac arteries were scheduled for F-TAVI, otherwise A-TAVI was preferred.RESULTS: The patients were treated between February 2006 and June 2010. Of these were 44% males and 56% females with a mean (S.D.) age of 81 (7.0). Thirty-days mortality rate was 8%, and decreased from 12% among the first 50 patients to 4% for the last 50 patients. Successful implantation was achieved in 92% patients. Major non-fatal complications were seen in 5% of 76 A-TAVI and in 0% of 24 F-TAVI patients. Mean (S.D.) EuroSCORE in the F-TAVI and A-TAVI groups was 15.9 (9.4) and 21.5 (14), respectively (p = 0.06). Post-procedural leakage of cardiac biomarkers was significantly higher in the A-TAVI group as compared to in the F-TAVI group. Mean (S.D.) NYHA class improved from 2.9 (0.6) to 1.8 (0.7) p < 0.001, with no significant difference between A-TAVI and F-TAVI patients.CONCLUSION: In surgically non-amenable patients, TAVI can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity and results in marked functional improvement. A decrease in 30-day mortality over time indicated a learning curve when implementing this treatment.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality

KW - Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects

KW - Clinical Competence

KW - Denmark

KW - Female

KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis

KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects

KW - Hospital Mortality

KW - Hospitals, University

KW - Humans

KW - Learning Curve

KW - Male

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Registries

KW - Risk Assessment

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Time Factors

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.3109/14017431.2011.575174

DO - 10.3109/14017431.2011.575174

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21506661

VL - 45

SP - 261

EP - 266

JO - Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal

JF - Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal

SN - 1401-7458

IS - 5

ER -